Re: [SR-Users] Problem with Stateless Dispatcher Call Load Distribution (Algorithm 10)

Hi Daniel, Yes I am using forward() because I thought it would be the fastest solution. I guess I was lead on by the dispatcher documentation saying it can be used statelessly, so I tried to do the whole route script stateless. However, I've recently been looking at t_relay and in particular t_ch

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio SCA Module

On Nov 30, 2012, at 5:23 PM, Robert Boisvert wrote: > Andrew, > Congratulations on your new position as a Kamailio developer! When I saw > your module (SCA) I began testing immediately since it may be a stepping > stone to help me get the Polycom barge-in feature working with Kamailio. > Ho

Re: [SR-Users] NAPTR, SRV and sips vs. transport=tls

Hi Juha, My impression is that transport=tls is something like a widely used consensus on how to securely communicate in SIP. However, is there a way how support for that is communicated towards a client, like SIPS+D2T was supposed to be the way to indicate "sips" support in NAPTR? I'm using TLS

[SR-Users] NAPTR, SRV and sips vs. transport=tls

Andreas Granig writes: > A lot of clients and servers are sending > "sip:u...@example.com;transport=tls" in request URIs and Contact headers > and Record-Route headers, and you can check with > uri_param("transport","tls") which transport socket to use. This is > pretty useful as you can determine

[SR-Users] NAPTR, SRV and sips vs. transport=tls

Hi, Hope to get some guidance here over the usage of "sips" and "sip plus transport=tls" when following RFC3263. The RFC3263 says that a NATPR record could return something like this for a query like "host -t NAPTR example.com": ; order pref flags service regexp replacement

Re: [SR-Users] LCR Failover

Kamailio sends the following when the first gateway times out. Failure route is never executed and next_gw specified in route block still results in the following. Asterisk placed call to kamailio: U kamailio:5060 -> asterisk:5060 SIP/2.0 408 Request Timeout. Via: SIP/2.0/UDP asterisk:5060;bran

Re: [SR-Users] LCR Failover

Gave that a try still without success. -Original Message- From: sr-users-boun...@lists.sip-router.org [mailto:sr-users-boun...@lists.sip-router.org] On Behalf Of Juha Heinanen Sent: Friday, November 30, 2012 1:34 AM To: SIP Router - Kamailio (OpenSER) and SIP Express Router (SER) - Users

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio <-> Asterisk MWI

On Friday 30 November 2012 09:42:11 Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: > > I'm trying to get the MWI indicator on endpoints to work by redirecting > > the SUBSCRIBE to the voicemail server (asterisk) using > > usc_replace_(to|from). This works fine for the initial request but the > > next subscribe wi

Re: [SR-Users] [sr-dev] dns resolver issue (RFC3263)

Hi, On 2012-11-30 09:07, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: Hello, On 11/19/12 10:18 AM, MÉSZÁROS Mihály wrote: Hi Daniel, On 2012-11-14 12:51, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: Hello, On 11/12/12 10:50 AM, MÉSZÁROS Mihály wrote: Hi, I made some progress. As I stated before, I made a patch and

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio <-> Asterisk MWI

Hello, On 11/27/12 4:38 PM, Daniel Tryba wrote: I'm trying to get the MWI indicator on endpoints to work by redirecting the SUBSCRIBE to the voicemail server (asterisk) using usc_replace_(to|from). This works fine for the initial request but the next subscribe will fail since the to/from don't g

Re: [SR-Users] Linphone presence

Hello, On 11/27/12 9:23 PM, Moacir Ferreira wrote: I am trying to get Linphone to show presence information. I did my Kamailio setup using just the template from a stardard install and it is working properly with Bria (X-Ten). However, when using Linphone it does not show buddies presence. Any

Re: [SR-Users] Call forking

Hello, On 11/27/12 9:52 PM, Moacir Ferreira wrote: All the topics/examples I found on the net is not what I am looking for, so here is the question: How do I achieve parallel forking (call all devices) if I have a single user registered using the same account from different devices (i.e.: tabl

Re: [SR-Users] t_fork_to?

Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes: > The docs have to be updated, the function is no longer in the code (if > it actually ever was). ok, just updated devel version. -- juha ___ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-

Re: [SR-Users] Problem with Stateless Dispatcher Call Load Distribution (Algorithm 10)

Hello, by stateless dispatcher do you mean using forward() to send out the INVITE? Cheers, Daniel On 11/28/12 1:40 PM, SIP Mailing-list wrote: Further edit: Actually I tried using ds_select_dst to forward the ACK on the unconfirmed (unanswered; 603 Decline) call but it routed to another des

Re: [SR-Users] Jitsi to Jitsi call

Hello, On 11/29/12 8:22 AM, Raj Roy Ghandhi wrote: Hi Peter, Still I am unable to make call to Jitsi to Jitsi. Call established But no media. But text message works. NAT traversal work with RTPProxy and I can do IPPhone to IPPhone call and voice works very well. Tried with many soft phones

Re: [SR-Users] WITH_PRESENCE charsh Kamailio

Hello, On 11/29/12 12:34 PM, Raj Roy Ghandhi wrote: Hi, I am running Kamailio 3.4 with web-socket and everything works fine with NAT traversal for IP Phones. But when I enable the PRESENCE it crash with "(3) errors in config file" I have copied the config.cfg to paste-bin at http://pastebin.

Re: [SR-Users] Enforced TLS, still some packets are through UDP

Hello, On 11/29/12 1:32 PM, Freddy C wrote: Hi, TLS work on TCP 5061 To view the header you can use $ hdr (HEADER_NAME). Not much English, sorry. 2012/11/29 Kamal Palei > Dear All I ma trying to have all SIP signalling through TLS. Using Kamailio

Re: [SR-Users] Lua env not initialized in event_route

Hello, On 11/29/12 4:46 PM, Vicente Hernando wrote: Hello I'm trying to execute a Lua script on kamailio startup. I'm calling the script inside event_route[hable:mod-init], but it fails to be executed with this error: [app_lua_mod.c:167]: Lua env not initialized It happens both with lua_r

Re: [SR-Users] [sr-dev] dns resolver issue (RFC3263)

Hello, On 11/19/12 10:18 AM, MÉSZÁROS Mihály wrote: Hi Daniel, On 2012-11-14 12:51, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: Hello, On 11/12/12 10:50 AM, MÉSZÁROS Mihály wrote: Hi, I made some progress. As I stated before, I made a patch and submitted to git branch misi/dns_srv. I tested with dns

Re: [SR-Users] t_fork_to?

The docs have to be updated, the function is no longer in the code (if it actually ever was). Go ahead and update the wiki. In tm I did some clean up recently, because append_branch was documented there. Cheers, Daniel On 11/30/12 8:31 AM, Alex Balashov wrote: On 11/30/2012 02:07 AM, Juha H