[SR-Users] can not make calls with kamailio 3.3 and asterisk-10.7.0

2012-11-23 Thread James zhu
hello, guys:i follow the linkhttp://kb.asipto.com/asterisk:realtime:kamailio-3.3.x-asterisk-10.7.0-astdbi can registered users, kamctl online shows those status. but i can not make calls. this is debug message when i make a call from 102 to SIP 103--

Re: [SR-Users] Forwarding Relaying of REGISTER Messages

2012-11-23 Thread kellon
Hi All Alex responded to my question saying the following: "You can relay SIP messages of any type just the same way as you do with INVITEs -- e.g. t_relay(), forward(). But, proxying registration messages can have complications." can anyone give me some pointers or a list of some of these comp

Re: [SR-Users] Difficulties with with loose_route() when trying to handle non-compliant ACK

2012-11-23 Thread Richard Brady
Thanks Andrew > well, the RURI of remote ACK has proxy IP address 10.200.70.100 so proxy > thinks that previous hop was a strict router. Aha, that makes sense. But why would that make Kamailio apply strict routing? > I can't think of any > workaround that would not be an ugly hack at the moment,

Re: [SR-Users] Websocket with Kamailio 3.2.2 release

2012-11-23 Thread Raj Roy Ghandhi
Hi, GOOOD NEWS :-) I was able to compile and use Kamailio 3.4 with web-socket. Working well with SIPML5. Will be testing more and update you if I got into issue. Best Regards, Roy On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 12:46 AM, Raj Roy Ghandhi wrote: > Hi, > Thanks a lot for the support. Now I am on track.

Re: [SR-Users] Difficulties with with loose_route() when trying to handle non-compliant ACK

2012-11-23 Thread Andrew Pogrebennyk
Richard, well, the RURI of remote ACK has proxy IP address 10.200.70.100 so proxy thinks that previous hop was a strict router. I can't think of any workaround that would not be an ugly hack at the moment, though. On 11/23/2012 03:24 AM, Richard Brady wrote: > Hi guys > > I have a multihomed Kam