I figured out what was happening.
By doing "$(branch(q)[1]) = "0.1";" I was trying to write into an non
existent branch since 1 is actually the second branch because the main
branch ($ru) is not counted.
$(branch(q)[0]) = "0.1" // is the 1st.
$(branch(q)[1]) = "0.1" // is the 2nd.
Regards.
Car
I can't set any of the attributes values using the assignment syntax.
Everytime I do:
$(branch(q)[1]) = "0.1";
I get
ERROR: [lvalue.c:354]: setting pvar failed.
This is true for all attributes, nut just for "q".
Am I doing something wrong? I'm using Kamailio 3.2.3.
Regards.
Carlos.
On Fri
Have a look at the force_send_socket / $fs approach.
On 08/17/2012 12:48 PM, Luis Fernando Urrea wrote:
Hi all,
I am sort of a new comer to kamailio and I have a config in which
Kamailio listens on different IPs that correspond to SSH VPN tunnels.
The config handles a MULTIDOMAIN scenario with
Hi all,
I am sort of a new comer to kamailio and I have a config in which Kamailio
listens on different IPs that correspond to SSH VPN tunnels. The config
handles a MULTIDOMAIN scenario with FreeSWITCH as multi tenant media server.
The situation I am facing is that when a REGISTERED user calls in
On my set-up, I forward incoming dids to freeswitch for handling, and then
forward requests from registered users to another.
There's a great tutorial from Daniel/asipto that should be a very good guide:
http://kb.asipto.com/freeswitch:kamailio-3.1.x-freeswitch-1.0.6d-sbc
With best regards,
Hi Sammy and Fred,
Basically I'm building a hosted PBX platform using a muti domain FreeSWITCH
setup. Freeswitch and Kamailio are on a public IP. Previously all endpoints
registered to Freeswitch directly which works great. For scalability purposes,
my thought was to use Kamailio in front of
Hello,
it should be straightforward starting with 3.3.0 to run Kamailio behind
a port forwarding NAT (like amazon ec2), using the 'advertise' property
of the listen parameter:
http://www.kamailio.org/wiki/cookbooks/3.3.x/core#listen
For example, default config will stay 'unchanged' apart of
I'll try that :).
Thanks for your help.
Carlos.
On Fri, Aug 17, 2012 at 5:30 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
>
> On 8/16/12 10:50 PM, Carlos Ruiz Díaz wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 4:30 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla <
> mico...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> On 8/16/12 9:15 PM, Carlos R
Hi Spencer,
Is Kamailio also natted? If so, you may have some issues... if not, it should
work great. I run a server like this as well... very happy with it.
I gave up on kamailio/freeswitch behind nat. Well, didn't give up, just don't
have the time to make it work.
With best regards,
Fred
ht
Hi,
You kind of sound a little different here. Are you saying that the
REGISTRATIONs will be handled by Freeswitch but store the registration Data
in Kamailio "location" table !?
Just go through the Kamailio blog by-Miconda or kb.asipto.com specially the
one on integrating the Asterisk Realtime w
I do that
No issue so far
Envoyé de mon iPhone
Le 17 août 2012 à 13:42, "JR Richardson" a écrit :
> Hi All,
>
> I’m considering running Kamailio as a virtual machine, with such low
> utilization, it doesn’t seem to make sense to keep running it on a physical
> host server.
>
> I’ve been v
On Friday, August 17, 2012, JR Richardson wrote:
> Hi All,
>
>
>
> I’m considering running Kamailio as a virtual machine, with such low
utilization, it doesn’t seem to make sense to keep running it on a physical
host server.
>
>
>
> I’ve been virtualizing Asterisk PBX’s for years and run a host of
Hi All,
I'm considering running Kamailio as a virtual machine, with such low
utilization, it doesn't seem to make sense to keep running it on a physical
host server.
I've been virtualizing Asterisk PBX's for years and run a host of other
virtualized servers with OpenVZ, VMware and MS V-Serv
Daniel,
As always experience counts the most (I did not consider the multiple
contacts scenario).
Here is what I cooked now after your advice (for the sake of proper
archiving). In the end I will process the rcv contact parameter (which
will become ruri param) in the proxy sitting in front o
Hello,
On 8/17/12 11:13 AM, DanB wrote:
If it helps someone else, got in the mean time another way of
accessing it, via transformations on top of $du:
$(du{uri.param,received}).
$du is the address of next hop and it is set due to the Path headers in
this case. In the case there is no interm
Hey Daniel,
Yeah, got the header out of received from path. Actually I have
de-coupled registrations which work and store just fine the received
parameter out of INVITEs which are querying the registrar using lookup.
In the end I have ended up using received parameter if present in $du
after
Hello,
On 8/17/12 10:47 AM, DanB wrote:
Hey All,
I was wondering if anyone could point me to the right direction on the
following issue:
I use registrar with path to store contacts after main proxy. There I
have properly stored received db field (original address of the NAT
router).
did
On 8/16/12 10:50 PM, Carlos Ruiz Díaz wrote:
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 4:30 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla
mailto:mico...@gmail.com>> wrote:
On 8/16/12 9:15 PM, Carlos Ruiz Díaz wrote:
Looks like km_append_branch() doesn't have all of the signatures
that the original append_branch
If it helps someone else, got in the mean time another way of accessing
it, via transformations on top of $du:
$(du{uri.param,received}).
The question which still stands: is there more "automated" way to
properly handle 302 redirect when the contact is behind NAT?
DanB
O
_
Hey All,
I was wondering if anyone could point me to the right direction on the
following issue:
I use registrar with path to store contacts after main proxy. There I
have properly stored received db field (original address of the NAT
router).
When I query the registrar, I get the user conta
20 matches
Mail list logo
