Re: [SR-Users] Possible bad lcr module, after upgrade to 3.3.0 from 3.2

2012-06-22 Thread Alexey Mechanoshin
Ok, simple core install, to other host, Debian x64 squeeze from this: http://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/6.0.5/amd64/iso-cd/debian-6.0.5-amd64-netinst.iso #aptitude install mysql-server mc Create file and change: root@r59vsipgw:/etc/apt/sources.list.d# cat kamailio.list deb http://deb.kamailio.org

[SR-Users] ERROR: uri2dst: bad_uri

2012-06-22 Thread Barthel Marco (CI/AFU1)
Hi, we are using kamailio at Bosch with some several thousand users. From time to time we encounter the following in the logs of kamailio: /usr/sbin/kamailio[9247]: ERROR: tm [ut.h:255]: ERROR: uri2dst: bad_uri: sip: /usr/sbin/kamailio[9247]: ERROR: tm [t_fwd.c:1528]: ERROR: t_forward_nonack: f

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio Unexpectedly Terminating

2012-06-22 Thread Akan
Hello, After doing some research, this is what I found out. On Solaris Sparc 64bit system, there is a mandatory alignment of memory accesses and also for data types. I went thru the core dump, disassembled the code and located the instruction that produced the error. The registers addresses i

Re: [SR-Users] Nathelper module, FLT_NATS, FLT_NATB

2012-06-22 Thread Klaus Darilion
On 22.06.2012 13:50, Richard Brady wrote: Thanks guys, fantastic answers. You mention that NAT detection happens before save() and the flag is set by lookup() which makes much more sense. However, if Kamailio is not the registrar, as is the case with my current project, those functions are not

Re: [SR-Users] Nathelper module, FLT_NATS, FLT_NATB

2012-06-22 Thread Richard Brady
Thanks guys, fantastic answers. You mention that NAT detection happens before save() and the flag is set by lookup() which makes much more sense. However, if Kamailio is not the registrar, as is the case with my current project, those functions are not called, so an alternative is needed. There ar

Re: [SR-Users] Nathelper module, FLT_NATS, FLT_NATB

2012-06-22 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Hello, just short clarification ... On 6/22/12 10:07 AM, Klaus Darilion wrote: [...] 2. The FLT_NATS and FLB_NATB flags. I'd like to know what this stands for, I guess "flag for transaction - NAT" and "flag for branch - NAT" but what do the S and the B stand for? More importantly what do these

Re: [SR-Users] Can Kamailio be used to redirect media between a client that switches from wifi to 3g/gsm

2012-06-22 Thread Klaus Darilion
Hi Shaun! Your problem description is too short to give you any good help. Use tcpdump (or other tools) to capture the scenario with Asterisk and Kamailio. Then compare them to find out why it doesn't work. Is media sent directly to Asterisk then it ca not be the problem of Kamailio. I hop

[SR-Users] Geographically Distributed Active Sites/Servers

2012-06-22 Thread SamyGo
Hello, I've been pondering over an architecture of distributed VoIP services on different geographic regions. I'm sure its nothing new and there are lots of guys have ideas to share. There are multiple SIP enabled Regions/locations, each has its own media services and full services capability. No

Re: [SR-Users] Nathelper module, FLT_NATS, FLT_NATB

2012-06-22 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Hello, On 6/22/12 1:33 AM, Richard Brady wrote: Hi folks I've configured Kamailio as a simply multi-homed proxy offering NAT traversa, TCP connection management, etc to FreeSWICH behind it. FreeSWITCH acts as the registrar. I'm trying to understand the default config and the following thing

Re: [SR-Users] Nathelper module, FLT_NATS, FLT_NATB

2012-06-22 Thread Klaus Darilion
Hi Richard! On 22.06.2012 01:33, Richard Brady wrote: Hi folks I've configured Kamailio as a simply multi-homed proxy offering NAT traversa, TCP connection management, etc to FreeSWICH behind it. FreeSWITCH acts as the registrar. I'm trying to understand the default config and the following th

Re: [SR-Users] FW: (Devel) Segmentation fault using pua_dialoginfo

2012-06-22 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Hello, On 6/21/12 10:52 PM, Charles Chance wrote: Hi Daniel It is fixed :-) What was the problem? a mistaken free of a parameter that was provided to tm callbacks -- it was introduced in one of the previous commits, so it was only in 3.3 branch, not 3.2. Cheers, Daniel Thanks, Charle