On 06/08/2012 03:09 PM, Morten Isaksen wrote:
Hi,
Hello,
We have 2 Kamailio 3.0.3 servers that has been running with
carrierroute for about 2 years without any problems. They have 128 MB
shared memory and
The shared memory is too little. Keep in mind that this is shared by all
children, so it
Hi,
On 06/08/2012 03:23 PM, Aft nix wrote:
>> http://www.mbdsys.com/foss/htproxy/file/f16c43f3c3c3/README
>>
>> it is kind of http proxy that can be used to tunnel udp packets. You need to
>> have a client application supporting it, on the sip server side you don't
>> need anything.
>
> Does this
Hello,
I try to understand the nonce count handling.
By parameter "modparam("auth", "nonce_expire", 21600)" I can define the
validity of the Nonce in the time.
But I want also to define the validity of the Nonce in the number of use. For
exemple, I want to limit the reuse of the nonce at 64 ti
On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 6:41 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla
wrote:
>
> On 6/8/12 1:26 PM, Aft nix wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 2:18 PM, Andrew Pogrebennyk
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> The papers talk about transport protocol for signaling, not media/RTP.
>>> I didn't hear of anyone who does RTP over TCP
Hello,
On 6/8/12 2:09 PM, Morten Isaksen wrote:
Hi,
We have 2 Kamailio 3.0.3 servers that has been running with
carrierroute for about 2 years without any problems. They have 128 MB
shared memory and
modparam("carrierroute", "config_source", "db")
modparam("carrierroute", "db_url", "")
modpara
On 6/8/12 1:26 PM, Aft nix wrote:
On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 2:18 PM, Andrew Pogrebennyk
wrote:
The papers talk about transport protocol for signaling, not media/RTP.
I didn't hear of anyone who does RTP over TCP neither. I doubt even that
the performance is a primary reason behind that, for media
Hi,
We have 2 Kamailio 3.0.3 servers that has been running with
carrierroute for about 2 years without any problems. They have 128 MB
shared memory and
modparam("carrierroute", "config_source", "db")
modparam("carrierroute", "db_url", "")
modparam("carrierroute", "fetch_rows", 500)
The carrierro
On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 2:18 PM, Andrew Pogrebennyk
wrote:
> The papers talk about transport protocol for signaling, not media/RTP.
> I didn't hear of anyone who does RTP over TCP neither. I doubt even that
> the performance is a primary reason behind that, for media over TCP the
> client link must
The papers talk about transport protocol for signaling, not media/RTP.
I didn't hear of anyone who does RTP over TCP neither. I doubt even that
the performance is a primary reason behind that, for media over TCP the
client link must be virtually packet-loss free (due to TCP
retransmissions), while
