Re: [SR-Users] kamailio-sipcapture-modules package?

Hi, Thanks for the replies. I just figured out that sipcapture is not released in 3.1.5 and was only introduced in 3.2. That's why it was hard to find. Skyler On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 11:00 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla < mico...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, > > the sipcapture module, as well as

Re: [SR-Users] xhttp and xmlrpc

Thanks Daniel. I added following module param and it worked! modparam("xhttp", "url_skip", "^/RPC2") Thanks Krish Kura On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 12:58 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla < mico...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, > > you have to set uri_skip or uri_match parameters, they are in both modules:

Re: [SR-Users] RTPproxy and kamailio

users@lists.sip-router.org> sr-users@lists.sip-router.org > >> <http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-> http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi- > >> bin/mailman/listinfo/sr-users > > > > > > ___ > > SIP Express Ro

[SR-Users] change/replace anything in body message

Hi, Is there a way to change/replace anything in body message ? Used: replace_body_atonce, replace_body_all, replace_all, subst_body. Nothing is working. Thanks, ___ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users@lists.

Re: [SR-Users] reply code for lower cseq

24 apr 2012 kl. 16:04 skrev Daniel-Constantin Mierla: > Hello, > > On 4/24/12 3:55 PM, Olle E. Johansson wrote: >> 24 apr 2012 kl. 14:27 skrev Daniel-Constantin Mierla: >> >>> Hello, >>> >>> thanks, I found that as well, but I didn't wanted to believe is no update >>> to it in regard to sip c

Re: [SR-Users] reply code for lower cseq

Hello, On 4/24/12 3:55 PM, Olle E. Johansson wrote: 24 apr 2012 kl. 14:27 skrev Daniel-Constantin Mierla: Hello, thanks, I found that as well, but I didn't wanted to believe is no update to it in regard to sip client behavior. A phone replying with such generic code is really misleading for

Re: [SR-Users] reply code for lower cseq

24 apr 2012 kl. 14:27 skrev Daniel-Constantin Mierla: > Hello, > > thanks, I found that as well, but I didn't wanted to believe is no update to > it in regard to sip client behavior. A phone replying with such generic code > is really misleading for such case . So I searched further in 4xx cla

Re: [SR-Users] reply code for lower cseq

Hello, thanks, I found that as well, but I didn't wanted to believe is no update to it in regard to sip client behavior. A phone replying with such generic code is really misleading for such case . So I searched further in 4xx class, base rfc and other extensions, and could not find anything.

Re: [SR-Users] reply code for lower cseq

12.2.2 If the remote sequence number is empty, it MUST be set to the value of the sequence number in the CSeq header field value in the request. If the remote sequence number was not empty, but the sequence number of the request is lower than the remote sequence number, the request

Re: [SR-Users] reply code for lower cseq

Hi Daniel, See RFC 3261 section 12.2.2: If the remote sequence number was not empty, but the sequence number of the request is lower than the remote sequence number, the request is out of order and MUST be rejected with a 500 (Server Internal Error) response. However, 400 or some 4xx

[SR-Users] reply code for lower cseq

Hello, I was wondering if someone here can point quickly where specs mention what is the right reply code to send when a request within dialog is received with lower cseq value than the previous request. I couldn't spot the part in the RFC yet, if any related exists. Cheers, Daniel -- Danie

[SR-Users] call for participation: kamailio project at LinuxTag 2012

Hello, in about four weeks the kamailio project will (again) be present on the LinuxTag fair, "the most important place for Linux and open source software in Europe" - http://www.linuxtag.org/2012/en.html . If you are in Berlin during this time, plan to visit the LinuxTag or just like to help you

Re: [SR-Users] RTPproxy and kamailio

So let me get this straight , so if i have a client behind a NAT , the client should be able to connect to the stun server ( which has the real ip for example : 192.168.10.1 ) , and by default i should be able to make the stun server connect to the kamailio (which also have a real ip for example

Re: [SR-Users] RTPproxy and kamailio

HI, stun is working completely out of kamailio, it deal only witch SIP clients. Older fashioned stun server is included for example inside of regular linux repository, for example for debian palo73 > -Original Message- > From: sr-users-boun...@lists.sip-router.org [mailto:sr-users- > bou

Re: [SR-Users] RTPproxy and kamailio

Thank you it worked well enough , but do you have an idea if there any configuration for Stun server ? , or i just install stun server and link it up to kamailio ? On 4/23/12, Jan Klepal wrote: > Hello Ryan, > > kamailio default config is already prepared for rtpproxy. Do exactly what is > noted