Hello all,
i am currently confused by using the avpops function avp_delete. When i
run avp_delete without the flag-value \g only the last value will be
unset (like an undo). Is this the wanted behaviour?
EXAMPLE:
$avp(test) = "test"
if( $avp(test)){xlog("L_NOTICE","result1:$avp(test)\n");}
Hi,
I need to add a parameter to the contact header. suppose to look like:
Contact:
How do I add the parameters?
Should i concatenate the $ct with the parameters?
Or is there a better way?
BR,
Uri
___
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) -
Hi,
I noticed that calling call_control( ) function forces engage_media_proxy(
).
Is there a way to disable this behavior ?
Thanks
Reda
___
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://list
Greetings,
I'm not sure if I found a bug, or if I just have something completely
misconfigured... I'm a total newb with Kamailio, working on a proof of concept
design.
Here's my configuration:
provider -> nat firewall -> kamailio/rtpproxy -> asterisk
For outbound calls from a
Hey Phillip,
Am 21.02.2012 um 07:50 schrieb Phillman25 Kyriacou:
> Thanks for your prompt response.
>
> I realized what i did wrong now, i had followed the guide you specified below
> but i believe i may have entered the following command more than once:
>
> INSERT INTO version (table_name, ta
On 02/21/2012 12:38 PM, Andrew Pogrebennyk wrote:
> The BYE follows the loose routing path, proxy gets 481 from the sbc and
> forwards that response back to PSTN gw, which somehow breaks it. AFAICS
> it's not specified in RFC what should the behavior look like when
> getting both a 200 and error-cl
Hi All!
We did litttle research:
- both behind the NAT = all OK = straeming over the rtpproxy
- caller behind NAT (other public) = all BAD = no change in SDP
(Connection Address) - rtp stream sending on private addres
- calle behind NAT (other public) = all BAD = SDP has changed but only
priv
Hello,
we have a Kamailio proxy which gets the call from PSTN gw and does some
call forwarding (serial forking) to several destinations through our sbc
The call flow I am looking at is:
- Kamailio sends INVITE to branch_1.
- branch_1 sends 180 with to-tag*, proxy relays it to the gw
* 180 meets t
I just want to know whether installing of the TOPOH modul would
somehow affect users of my proxy?
When the UAC creates (at least blink does so and few hardware phones I
have) the seq. request, it places a received contact from 200OK
(INVITE transaction) into a Request URI of the seq.request.
So w
