On 3 February 2012 20:36, dotnetdub wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I've just installed 3.2.2. I'm using a config that was working fine with
> 3.1 and all seems ok.
>
> I get one error that I don't get on 3.1 at startup.
>
> kamailio: ERROR: [ppcfg.c:79]: ### added subst expression: /DB/mysql
>
> This is r
Hi Daniel,
thank you for answer. I think that parts of kamailio default config
will not working with pcscf. (e.g. there is on pcscf no database - it
has hss)
It partialy works with pcscf config -> it rewrites Connecition
Infromation IP in SDP:
- sometimes with IP of rtpproxy (more often
Hi All,
I've just installed 3.2.2. I'm using a config that was working fine with
3.1 and all seems ok.
I get one error that I don't get on 3.1 at startup.
kamailio: ERROR: [ppcfg.c:79]: ### added subst expression: /DB/mysql
This is repeated for all SUBST statements in the config.
I get these
Thank you for your detailed response. Sorry for the trouble but would
you be able to also answer the following.
Do you know if this same type of deployment would be suited to our
needs. Many of the Asterisk servers we host are for clients, who have
their own extensions, voicemail, ivr etc
We were in similar situation. Many years with Asterisk and then we were
forced to use ser - and we preferred Kamailio.
Now we do:
Kamailio has global IP address and clients register to it.
Kamailio forward all calls to Asterisk boxes using following:
ds_select_dst("1","4");#You can use many aster
Hello
After much reading I have come to the realization that after years of
using Asterisk I know very little about Sip.
I have my Kamailio box up, I have Asterisk 1.8.x running with realtime
working. I thought it would be just a case of registering SIP trunks
from my provider to the kam
Hi all,
I have have been attempting to implement Remote-Party-ID support using
the app_lua module in Kamailio. Since more than one Remote-Party-ID
header may exist, this requires accessing the header pseudo-variable
with an index.
For example: $(hdr(Remote-Party-ID)[2])
Doing this causes Kamailio
Hi Daniel,
thank you for answer. I think that parts of kamailio default config
will not working with pcscf. (e.g. there is on pcscf no database - it
has hss)
It partialy works with pcscf config -> it rewrites Connecition
Infromation IP in SDP:
- sometimes with IP of rtpproxy (more often
Hi Albert!
On 03.02.2012 11:24, Albert Petit wrote:
Hi Klaus,
Thanks for your answer!
2012/2/3 Klaus Darilion mailto:klaus.mailingli...@pernau.at>>
The Load-Balancer is the only server which sees the real IP Address
of the client. Thus, some parts of NAT-Traversal can only be done by
On 03.02.2012 12:06, Yufei Tao wrote:
Hi
I think I got the tcp_crlf_ping and the tcp_keepalive parameters mixed up.
So for tcp_crlf_ping, Kamailio will only respond.
Yes.
> While for
tcp_keepalive parameters, if enabled on both server and client, both
will be sending the keepalives, and t
Hi
I think I got the tcp_crlf_ping and the tcp_keepalive parameters mixed up.
So for tcp_crlf_ping, Kamailio will only respond. While for
tcp_keepalive parameters, if enabled on both server and client, both
will be sending the keepalives, and the receiver will respond.
In order to use tcp_crlf_p
Hi
I want to use TCP keepalive to detect dead connections between Kamailio
and my SIP clients. I've got some questions about this:
1. If I enable it on Kamailio by setting for example:
tcp_crlf_ping = yes
tcp_keepalive = yes
tcp_keepidle = 60
tcp_keepintvl = 10
tcp_keepcnt = 3
>From what I read
Hi Klaus,
Thanks for your answer!
2012/2/3 Klaus Darilion
> The Load-Balancer is the only server which sees the real IP Address of the
> client. Thus, some parts of NAT-Traversal can only be done by the LB.
>
Expecting kind of this answer because also makes sense to me that LB is the
only one
The Load-Balancer is the only server which sees the real IP Address of
the client. Thus, some parts of NAT-Traversal can only be done by the LB.
E.g. the LB must use force_rport() and mangle the contact header of the
client. Further, if you use light-weight NAT-keep-alive (CR-LF) you have
to d
SIP: 400 Bad Request
2012/2/3 Albert Petit
> Hi,
>
>
> SIP UAS1
>
>
> SIP LB <->
>
>
>
>
>
> ___
> SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users maili
Hi , Sorry for previous email. Hit send too soon .
Good morning,
On my system i've a structure similar to:
SIP ClientsSIP Platform
[---][-]
S1 @IP2
Hi,
SIP UAS1
SIP LB <->
___
SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list
sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-
17 matches
Mail list logo
