Hello,
I'm working on building a HA setup with separate registrar and proxy
servers. The registrar server writes to a master database that is
replicated to a local database on each of the proxy servers. A load
balancer then sits in front of the proxys. When routing to a registered
user
Thanks for your help Alex!
Connected by DROID on Verizon Wireless
-Original message-
From: Alex Balashov
To: sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
Sent: Sat, Jan 28, 2012 17:40:37 GMT+00:00
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] Using forward(); with PVs
On 01/28/2012 12:35 PM, Spencer Thomason wrote:
I'm
On 01/28/2012 12:35 PM, Spencer Thomason wrote:
I'm experiencing some difficulty using forward with PVs. If the IP
and port are specified directly everything works but if I use PVs
for the values startup fails with a configuration error. What I'm
trying to do is statelessly forward an OPTIONS re
Hello,
I'm experiencing some difficulty using forward with PVs. If the IP and port
are specified directly everything works but if I use PVs for the values
startup fails with a configuration error. What I'm trying to do is
statelessly forward an OPTIONS request to a B2BUA that sits behind K
This is a distinction arising from the integration of SER and Kamailio into
sip-router. Selects come from the SER side, while PVs come from the Kamailio
side.
You can use either one depending on your needs; there is no methodological
prescription here, want one though you may. :-) Beware tha
Hello all,
I'm currently reworking our routing scripts in preparation for an upgrade to
3.2.2 from 3.1.5. I'm taking this time to perform a general cleanup an
optimization. In regard to selects vs PVs, is there any reason to choose one
or the other select over a PV when both exist for the need
