Re: [SR-Users] question bout UA and BOX in same NAT

Hi, Sorry, let me explain my situation. my box is behind nat with private ip 192.168.2.3 and nat ip is 60.x.x.x and asterisk is same nat as the box with private ip 192.168.2.23 now let say i got 2 UA. one UA is located on different nat and another UA is same nat with the box. UA1- private ip 1

Re: [SR-Users] Does xcap server of kamailio support partial update of xcap document?

Hello, inserting a new node seems not to be possible through xpath operations only, so I made a patch to be able to add new nodes (entries) -- see it attached -- it is for devel version (master branch), hopefully it applies clean to 3.1 if you are using that version. There was no option to t

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio + rtpproxy talking to multiple carrier gateways - Solution

I think I have this working. For anyone else trying to do similar thing (or placing Kamailio behind FW/NAT), here is my cookbook. We are trying to setup the following: [UAS] <--> (PubIP)[FireWall/One-to-OneNAT]<>(PrivIP)[Kamailio/RTPProxy](PrivIP)<-->(PrivIP2)[UAC]

Re: [SR-Users] no publish from pua/pua_mi to outbound proxy

Hello, On 8/30/11 7:43 AM, Juha Heinanen wrote: Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes: In the xmlrpc command, there was an etag value, have you tried with '.' as etag? i haven't tried with "." etag yet. i'll try that tomorrow. mi pua publish from different UAs on same presentity seems to work ok,

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio + rtpproxy talking to multiple carrier gateways

It seems that you are on the right path now. Regards, Ovidiu Sas On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 5:22 AM, Sarat C. Vemuri wrote: > Ovidiu, > > Thanks for your time.  The "fixes" I pulled in is the latest rr module only. > I didn't see anything in that diff to make this work.  Could you elaborate a > li

Re: [SR-Users] Does xcap server of kamailio support partial update of xcap document?

Hi, we have patch the xcap_misc.h with "#define XCAP_MAX_URI_SIZE 255" which was 127, and extended the length of field doc_uri in the xcap table to 256 from 128. Now the errror is gone. After that we have done some test with curl, following are the results: - DELETE an Entry from the list: OK

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio + rtpproxy talking to multiple carrier gateways

Ovidiu, Thanks for your time. The "fixes" I pulled in is the latest rr module only. I didn't see anything in that diff to make this work. Could you elaborate a little? However, I was able to get "Outbound" working properly by adding ";r2=on" to the record_route_preset IPs. In going throug

Re: [SR-Users] Does xcap server of kamailio support partial update of xcap document?

Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes: > Feel free to do it, however I think it has to be reviewed where is used, > though -- it should be safe even size in db is longer as long as the > insert is done by kamailio itself, not sure we have affected cases when > the insert is done by external apps, so

Re: [SR-Users] Does xcap server of kamailio support partial update of xcap document?

Hello, On 9/7/11 11:26 AM, Juha Heinanen wrote: Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes: the error is because the size of http url is higher than 127. You can increase it, no problem, it is now 255 in devel version -- be aware you have to increase in the database xcap table as well the size of doc_uri

Re: [SR-Users] Does xcap server of kamailio support partial update of xcap document?

Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes: > the error is because the size of http url is higher than 127. You can > increase it, no problem, it is now 255 in devel version -- be aware you > have to increase in the database xcap table as well the size of > doc_uri. daniel, if uri size in devel version n

Re: [SR-Users] Does xcap server of kamailio support partial update of xcap document?

Hello, On 9/7/11 11:24 AM, laura testi wrote: Hi Daniel, thank you for your quick reply. We have already tried with node selector '~~' after doc uri in the http XCAP PUT request. But We got the error "ERROR: xcap_server [xcap_misc.c:60]: http uri too long" then "ERROR: xcap_server [xcap_misc.c

Re: [SR-Users] Accounting only the 2nd branch of missed serial forked call

Hi Daniel, thanks for the quick fix and reply. What is the easiest way to try this new patch? I'm running kamailio 3.1.4 and there is no t_flush_flags() in tmx module in that version. I suppose I need to install Kamailio Devel from git ( http://www.kamailio.org/dokuwiki/doku.php/install:kamailio-

Re: [SR-Users] Does xcap server of kamailio support partial update of xcap document?

Hi Daniel, thank you for your quick reply. We have already tried with node selector '~~' after doc uri in the http XCAP PUT request. But We got the error "ERROR: xcap_server [xcap_misc.c:60]: http uri too long" then "ERROR: xcap_server [xcap_misc.c:736]: error setting xcap uri data...". I think t

Re: [SR-Users] permanent usrloc entries in Kamailio

Am 07.09.2011 10:16, schrieb Daniel-Constantin Mierla: > Hello, > > On 9/6/11 3:54 PM, Klaus Darilion wrote: >> Hi! >> >> Recently I had a problem with permanent usrloc entries when upgrading a >> server from SER 0.9 to Kamailio 3.1. >> >> Obviously the problem was that the permanent entries had

Re: [SR-Users] Siremis User Role permissions

Hello, On 8/29/11 7:45 PM, Camila Troncoso wrote: Hi, I have a question about the assignment of Role permissions to limit some Users privileges in Siremis. I defined a user , and then a Role denying some actions, but I couldn't deny the action from de SER menu . The Role permissions only sh

Re: [SR-Users] question bout UA and BOX in same NAT

Hello, On 9/6/11 8:53 AM, MingHon wrote: Hello List, Can i have UA in the same nat with the box and also UA in different nat at the same time? My box is currrently working behind nat with ip 192.168.2.3 and advertised_address is set to sip.mydomain.com is it pos

Re: [SR-Users] Does xcap server of kamailio support partial update of xcap document?

Hello, On 9/6/11 3:25 PM, laura testi wrote: Hi, I am using the XCAP server of kamailio for contact list and presence rules. It seems it only support to update the whole xcap doc of the user but not the partial update. Can anyone tell me if the kamailio's xcap server support the partial update o

Re: [SR-Users] permanent usrloc entries in Kamailio

Hello, On 9/6/11 3:54 PM, Klaus Darilion wrote: Hi! Recently I had a problem with permanent usrloc entries when upgrading a server from SER 0.9 to Kamailio 3.1. Obviously the problem was that the permanent entries had "flag=128" and now expires=0 is used, see old thread: http://old.nabble.com