Hi Sebastian,
On 7/14/11 7:01 PM, Sebastian Damm wrote:
Hi,
I'm still fighting problems in our Kamailio 1.5 to 3.1 migration.
Right now I'm stuck with a strange behavior of AVPs in my dialplan.
I set a lot of AVPs for accounting in the route directive, and I just
inserted an avp_print() s
Hi,
I'm still fighting problems in our Kamailio 1.5 to 3.1 migration. Right now
I'm stuck with a strange behavior of AVPs in my dialplan.
I set a lot of AVPs for accounting in the route directive, and I just
inserted an avp_print() statement right before t_relay() is called, all
values are set. T
Hi,
yup i tried "canreinivte=yes" in sip.conf and also in the extension
database.
urm how bout having direct rtp traffic and also relay rtp traffic in my
setup?
example, UA1 and UA2 is at the same nat. so UA1 and UA2 will have direct rtp
traffic.
UA1 <--(rtp)--> UA2.
and UA3 and UA4 both behin
Am 13.07.2011 10:07, schrieb MingHon:
> Hi,
>
> i tried set canreinvite=yes in asterisk but kamailio/rtpproxy still
> trying to send rtp traffic to asterisk.
That should not happen. You have to investigate why. You have to take a
look at the SIP signaling during and after call setup.
You shoul
Hi,
have you tried "canreinvite=yes" on your Asterisk-box?
If that does not help, there is probably no way to make the
RTP-Traffic bypass your asterisk box...
Carsten
2011/7/14 MingHon :
> Hello,
> anyone?
> currently my setup look like this.
> when UA1 call UA2 and the rtp traffic flow to kama
Hello,
anyone?
currently my setup look like this.
when UA1 call UA2 and the rtp traffic flow to kamailio and asterisk.
[UA1] <--(rtp)--> [Kamailio/RTPProxy] <--(rtp)--> [UA2]
^
|
RTP TRAFFIC
keeping the location of the UA.
> >
> > I want to register UA's on Kamailio, but the authentication is done by
> > [IP-PBX]...
> > So Kamailio as Outbound Proxy + Location Server ... any idea on how I can
> > achieve this configuration?
>
> Use Path mechanism so K
Am 13.07.2011 18:18, schrieb Henrik Aagaard Sørensen:
> I'm new to Kamailio.
>
> Is it possible to have a group of subscribers (with different
> extensions) that you can call? And the first to pickup the call gets it.
Yes. That's called "parallel forking".
regards
Klaus
__
I see, I'll give it a try and check the result then. Thanks.
On 13 July 2011 16:43, Klaus Darilion wrote:
>
>
> Am 13.07.2011 16:56, schrieb Pete Kelly:
> > Hi
> >
> > I have been researching the topoh module which I understand is stateless
> > and can persist across a server restart.
> >
> > Fr
