Re: [SR-Users] Remote Party ID Header

2011-06-23 Thread dotnetdub
On 23 June 2011 22:55, Alex Balashov wrote: > On 06/23/2011 05:52 PM, dotnetdub wrote: > > ERROR: pv [pv_trans.c:522]: invalid uri [> > >;privacy=full;screen=no>] >> >> /sbin/kamailio[27389]: ERROR: [lvalue.c:351]: non existing >> right pvar >> /sbin/kamailio

Re: [SR-Users] Remote Party ID Header

2011-06-23 Thread Alex Balashov
On 06/23/2011 05:52 PM, dotnetdub wrote: ERROR: pv [pv_trans.c:522]: invalid uri [mailto:sip%3a1234...@domain.ie>;privacy=full;screen=no>] /sbin/kamailio[27389]: ERROR: [lvalue.c:351]: non existing right pvar /sbin/kamailio[27389]: ERROR: [lvalue.c:411]: assignment failed at pos: (110,13-110,5

Re: [SR-Users] Remote Party ID Header

2011-06-23 Thread dotnetdub
On 23 June 2011 22:39, Alex Balashov wrote: > On 06/23/2011 05:37 PM, dotnetdub wrote: > >> Hi Alex, >> >> On 23 June 2011 22:00, Alex Balashov > > wrote: >> >>$(hdr(Remote-Party_ID){uri.__**param,privacy}); >> >> >> Still not working.. >> >> ERROR: [lval

Re: [SR-Users] Remote Party ID Header

2011-06-23 Thread Alex Balashov
On 06/23/2011 05:37 PM, dotnetdub wrote: Hi Alex, On 23 June 2011 22:00, Alex Balashov mailto:abalas...@evaristesys.com>> wrote: $(hdr(Remote-Party_ID){uri.__param,privacy}); Still not working.. ERROR: [lvalue.c:351]: non existing right pvar assignment failed at pos: (110,13-110,54) INF

Re: [SR-Users] Remote Party ID Header

2011-06-23 Thread dotnetdub
Hi Alex, On 23 June 2011 22:00, Alex Balashov wrote: > $(hdr(Remote-Party_ID){uri.**param,privacy}); > Still not working.. ERROR: [lvalue.c:351]: non existing right pvar assignment failed at pos: (110,13-110,54) INFO:

Re: [SR-Users] Remote Party ID Header

2011-06-23 Thread Alex Balashov
On 06/23/2011 12:58 PM, dotnetdub wrote: On 17 June 2011 18:22, Alex Balashov mailto:abalas...@evaristesys.com>> wrote: Brian, Remote-Party-ID is a long-obsolete draft that never became an RFC; why are you still using it? Anyway, if you know the 'privacy' header parameter wil

Re: [SR-Users] an idea - the SIP browser - elsipo

2011-06-23 Thread Skyler
Hi Daniel, Great idea and thank you for releasing a working example. IMO, on the surface this looks to me like another piece to the ultimate cross-platform SIP communications system (elsipo + Kamailio/SERx). This project is something I will definitely be looking at more to see how I can contribut

[SR-Users] an idea - the SIP browser - elsipo

2011-06-23 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Hello, I want to present an idea and see if it is something people find benefits with such approach. Some time ago, due to existence of only SIP client applications (aka softphones) that have static GUI, which were designed for generic purposes, do not present what servces the currently used

Re: [SR-Users] Remote Party ID Header

2011-06-23 Thread dotnetdub
On 17 June 2011 18:22, Alex Balashov wrote: > Brian, > > Remote-Party-ID is a long-obsolete draft that never became an RFC; why are > you still using it? > > Anyway, if you know the 'privacy' header parameter will always be there, > you can do this, assuming is_present_hf("Remote-Party-**ID"), of

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio doesn't hang up upon IP connectity loss to SIP endpoint

2011-06-23 Thread Brett Woollum
Hi Carsten, Thanks for the tip. All audio is going through RTPProxy on the Kamailio server, not directly to Asterisk. I will look into that patch. Thanks! Brett - Original Message - From: "Carsten Bock" To: "SIP Router - Kamailio (OpenSER) and SIP Express Router (SER) - Users

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio doesn't hang up upon IP connectity loss to SIP endpoint

2011-06-23 Thread Carsten Bock
Hi, another solution might be, to either configure an RTP-Timeout on the Asterisk (if you send your calls through the asterisk anyway). You might also consider using the RTPProxy with the patch in the sip-router-repository. With the patch, the RTPProxy will trigger a teardown of calls (via XML-RPC