Re: [SR-Users] Issue using pua_bla module

2011-05-27 Thread Watkins, Bradley
Whoops, forgot to mention the version, which is 3.1.3. Also, apologies for the disclaimer footer. That's not supposed to be there. I'll brow-beat my e-mail administrator when he returns. - Brad >-Original Message- >From: sr-users-boun...@lists.sip-router.org [mailto:sr-users- >boun...

[SR-Users] Issue using pua_bla module

2011-05-27 Thread Watkins, Bradley
I'm trying to get the pua_bla module to do its thing, and I'm running into an issue. I'm getting these errors when the first NOTIFY comes from the phone: ERROR: presence [publish.c:515]: Missing or unsupported event header field value ERROR: presence [publish.c:518]:event=[dialog;sla] I

Re: [SR-Users] Green VoIP - energy efficiency and performaces ofv3.0

2011-05-27 Thread Jeff Brower
Jan- > On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 06:54, Jeremya wrote: >> These figures pale into insignificance compared to the power required >> for standard SIP devices - typically 5-8 watts per device multiplied by >> the number of devices. >> >> When you factor in Gigabit Ethernet the power ups significantly.

[SR-Users] Dispatcher variables

2011-05-27 Thread Lee Archer
Hi all, I am using dispatcher and on a failure I would like to log the server that has failed. I am using $dd but this only ever returns the address of the first server that was tried and not any subsequent servers that were tried and also failed. What should I be using to display the IP addres

[SR-Users] core kamailio 3.1.2

2011-05-27 Thread Bruno Bresciani
Hi ALL Why kamailio 3.1.2 generate core when function recvmsg return 0? Below is the trace of the core kamailio: May 27 10:29:14 sswpst00 /home2/local/kamailio/sbin/kamailio[31288]: INFO:

Re: [SR-Users] kamailio debian package bug report : 3.1.3+lenny2

2011-05-27 Thread Henning Westerholt
On Wednesday 25 May 2011, Philippe HENSEL wrote: > Hi developpers and packagers, > > The file "/usr/lib64/kamailio/libsrdb2.so.1.0" seems to be included in > both "kamailio_3.1.3+lenny2_amd64.deb" and "kamailio-mysql-modules_3.1.3 > +lenny2_amd64.deb". So it is not possible to install > "kamailio-

Re: [SR-Users] ser_ctl / serweb

2011-05-27 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Hello, On 5/26/11 10:59 PM, caio wrote: Hello, Anyone know if ser_ctl (python utility) will be merged into master? Or is going to be deprecated? If it still alive, are there any examples/docs of the usage for DB users provisoining? kamctl and kamdbctl are recomended for its substitution? ca

Re: [SR-Users] Howto restore a FIFO file?

2011-05-27 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
On 5/27/11 1:01 AM, Klaus Darilion wrote: you can create FIFOs with mkfifo, but I do not think that it will work. probably it does not work, but maybe we can have safety check in the module that if the fifo file exists (it is not created by that instance), don't remove it. Cheers, Daniel

Re: [SR-Users] [OT] IETF SIMPLE WG will destroy MSRP with the new draft-ietf-simple-msrp-sessmatch-11

2011-05-27 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
On 5/27/11 11:41 AM, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote: 2011/5/27 Daniel-Constantin Mierla: Just a comment: Realtime communications in HTTP is, today, a hack Don't make me give examples of services with web im/presence for tens and hundreds of millions of users, they worth billions, a reality today. H

Re: [SR-Users] [OT] IETF SIMPLE WG will destroy MSRP with the new draft-ietf-simple-msrp-sessmatch-11

2011-05-27 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
The debate from my point of view was the _architecture of the protocols_: sip vs msrp -- read it to some extent like: structure of the messages. You go very much to specifics on existing sip for voice -- like it is unimaginable to have some requests (for content of communication) within a dialo

Re: [SR-Users] [OT] IETF SIMPLE WG will destroy MSRP with the new draft-ietf-simple-msrp-sessmatch-11

2011-05-27 Thread Iñaki Baz Castillo
2011/5/27 Daniel-Constantin Mierla : >> Just a comment: Realtime communications in HTTP is, today, a hack > > Don't make me give examples of services with web im/presence for tens and > hundreds of millions of users, they worth billions, a reality today. How you > call it, up to you. Not all of us

Re: [SR-Users] [OT] IETF SIMPLE WG will destroy MSRP with the new draft-ietf-simple-msrp-sessmatch-11

2011-05-27 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
On 5/27/11 10:50 AM, Iñaki Baz Castillo wrote: [...] Just a comment: Realtime communications in HTTP is, today, a hack Don't make me give examples of services with web im/presence for tens and hundreds of millions of users, they worth billions, a reality today. How you call it, up to you. C

Re: [SR-Users] [OT] IETF SIMPLE WG will destroy MSRP with the new draft-ietf-simple-msrp-sessmatch-11

2011-05-27 Thread Iñaki Baz Castillo
2011/5/27 Daniel-Constantin Mierla : > Looking at HTTP, when they needed file upload, they added put/delete -- they > stayed in the same protocol whenever possible. In this ways the > infrastructure nodes remain the same, only higher-level applications have to > be updated. When they needed asynchr

Re: [SR-Users] [OT] IETF SIMPLE WG will destroy MSRP with the new draft-ietf-simple-msrp-sessmatch-11

2011-05-27 Thread Iñaki Baz Castillo
2011/5/27 Daniel-Constantin Mierla : > I wonder if you really read to understand or just spot 'single concepts' to > make them out of the context in order to reply something. That is endless > and topic breaker. Hi Daniel, that is not my aim. Let me summarize (correct me if I minunderstood somethi

Re: [SR-Users] [OT] IETF SIMPLE WG will destroy MSRP with the new draft-ietf-simple-msrp-sessmatch-11

2011-05-27 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Hi, hope it has not lost in translation an sounded tough, really no such intention! I know Inaki is a "deep lover" of IETF :-), ready for heavy fights and actually we are allies here, fighting against IETF way of developing specs, but it happens to be from different directions this time. I e