[SR-Users] Reactivating a failed dispatcher destination

2011-05-19 Thread Lee Archer
Hi all I wonder if someone can help by pointing me in the right direction. I have dispatcher set to ping and set any failed gateways to probing but how do you get them out of this state when they start working again? I have run some tests and I must be missing something as active servers seem to

[SR-Users] Forward on unanswered call

2011-05-19 Thread Andrew O. Zhukov
Right now I'm try to add the subj feature. Linksys/SPA2102-3.3.6 (just from the box) respond SIP/2.0 480 Temporarily not available Landline over Asterisk with E1: SIP/2.0 603 Limit exceeded Ether I so unlucky, or just forget it and do not provide it to the customers? If so, notes to developers

Re: [SR-Users] Via branch parameter in end2end ACK

2011-05-19 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
On 5/19/11 9:58 AM, Juha Heinanen wrote: Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes: is the conclusion pointing to the suggested solution in the item you opened on tracker? http://sip-router.org/tracker/index.php?do=details&task_id=116&project=1 If not, can you update the item with the recommended sol

Re: [SR-Users] ACK to 486 is not being proxied

2011-05-19 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Hello, the ACK for non-2xx replies is hop-by-hop, meaning that kamailio will generate one when the reply is received, will send back the reply and when the ack comes from upstream, it will absorb it. In this case it seems that ack is not matching any invite transaction and thus is not known

Re: [SR-Users] Via branch parameter in end2end ACK

2011-05-19 Thread Juha Heinanen
Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes: > is the conclusion pointing to the suggested solution in the item you > opened on tracker? > > http://sip-router.org/tracker/index.php?do=details&task_id=116&project=1 > > If not, can you update the item with the recommended solution for the > case, it should

Re: [SR-Users] 403 Proxy forbidden replay for invite that send sip gateway

2011-05-19 Thread Carsten Bock
Hi, one way to achieve this, would be to modify the following block: Your Block now: # - AUTHENTICATE -- if(!is_domain_local(“$fd”)) { if(!is_domain_local(“$rd”)) { xlog(“++

Re: [SR-Users] Via branch parameter in end2end ACK

2011-05-19 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Hi Juha, On 5/18/11 12:12 PM, Juha Heinanen wrote: Francesco Castellano writes: using version 3.1.3 (kamailio flavour), I noticed that the Via inserted by the proxy, relaying an end2end ACK, contains a branch parameter equal to 0 (with no magic cookie prefixed). No misbehaviour followed, but I

Re: [SR-Users] redirect implementation with dispatcher

2011-05-19 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Hello, On 5/18/11 9:50 AM, alex pappas wrote: Daniel hi, I noticed that I was not using the ds_next_domain(). I was looping inside a ds_select_domain("$avp(s:disp_dstgrp)", "4"). I changed that to: For every gw_group: The first gw_group the $rd is getting fed from ds_select_domain("$avp

Re: [SR-Users] ~ operator has no effect

2011-05-19 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
On 5/18/11 8:36 AM, Juha Heinanen wrote: Brandon Armstead writes: Quick correction: $var(test) = $var(test)& ~ 2; that is what i actually tried to do in the first place and it had no effect. luckily m4 exists. Looks like some operators are missing in the new core cfg interpreter, incl

Re: [SR-Users] perlvdb error

2011-05-19 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
On 5/18/11 8:29 AM, Roman Yeryomin wrote: On 2 May 2011 15:47, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: On 5/1/11 11:51 PM, Roman Yeryomin wrote: On 27 April 2011 20:19, Roman Yeryominwrote: On 27 April 2011 17:26, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: Can you try with tcp disabled? i.e., disable