Re: [SR-Users] 403 Proxy forbidden replay for invite that send sip gateway

2011-05-18 Thread hala alramli
thanks for your reply Klaus ,attached my config file could you please take a look ,i found the line that send that replay  but i do not know why .? could you help me i am stuck --- Mer 18/5/11, Klaus Darilion ha scritto: Da: Klaus Darilion Oggetto: Re: [SR-Users] 403 Proxy forbidden repl

[SR-Users] ACK to 486 is not being proxied

2011-05-18 Thread Carl Wagner
Hi, I have Kamailio set up to act as a proxy and load balancer. Most things are working correctly but for some reason I can't get Kamailio to proxy an ACK to a 486 Busy. I assume that it is something wrong that I have done in the kamailio.cfg file but I am not seeing it. Does the t_check_tr

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio 1.5 acc on glare BYE

2011-05-18 Thread Tobias Lindgren
Daniel, thanks, works perfectly! :) Br, /Tobias Date: Wed, 18 May 2011 14:25:36 +0200 From: mico...@gmail.com To: sr-users@lists.sip-router.org CC: the...@hotmail.com Subject: Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio 1.5 acc on glare BYE Hello, if you want to account non-2xx tra

Re: [SR-Users] 403 Proxy forbidden replay for invite that send sip gateway

2011-05-18 Thread Klaus Darilion
if(!is_domain_local(“$fd”)) { if(!is_domain_local(“$rd”)) { xlog(“+ bad from fd from IP: $fd\n”); xlog(“+ bad from $rd from IP: $rd \n”); sl_send

Re: [SR-Users] Via branch parameter in end2end ACK

2011-05-18 Thread Francesco Castellano
Thanks Juha, I apologise, I was unlucky searching before posting. Searching for `"branch parameter" serusers' `about syn_branch' produces better results than mine. Regards, Francesco Castellano On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 12:12 PM, Juha Heinanen wrote: > Francesco Castellano writes: > >> using ve

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio 1.5 acc on glare BYE

2011-05-18 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Hello, if you want to account non-2xx transaction, then set the flag for it: http://kamailio.org/docs/modules/stable/modules_k/acc.html#id2511998 So for BYEs, you should set both flags, for accounting 2xx and non-2xx cases. Cheers, Daniel On 5/18/11 11:32 AM, Tobias Lindgren wrote: Hi all!

[SR-Users] Via branch parameter in end2end ACK

2011-05-18 Thread Juha Heinanen
Francesco Castellano writes: > using version 3.1.3 (kamailio flavour), I noticed that the Via > inserted by the proxy, relaying an end2end ACK, contains a branch > parameter equal to 0 (with no magic cookie prefixed). No misbehaviour > followed, but I was wonder about the reason for this behaviour

[SR-Users] Via branch parameter in end2end ACK

2011-05-18 Thread Francesco Castellano
Dear sirs, using version 3.1.3 (kamailio flavour), I noticed that the Via inserted by the proxy, relaying an end2end ACK, contains a branch parameter equal to 0 (with no magic cookie prefixed). No misbehaviour followed, but I was wonder about the reason for this behaviour and whether it can be a f

Re: [SR-Users] 403 Proxy forbidden replay for invite that send sip gateway

2011-05-18 Thread Klaus Darilion
Check your config and verify where 403 is sent. You have something like sl_send_reply("403","Proxy forbidden") in your config. regards Klaus Am 18.05.2011 10:48, schrieb hala alramli: > Hello every body, > could you help me ? > > i bought Geographical DID numbers from gateway provider , to re

[SR-Users] Kamailio 1.5 acc on glare BYE

2011-05-18 Thread Tobias Lindgren
Hi all! I have a short question with regards to how the acc module handles (or rather logs) BYEs. As I understand, a BYE followed by an 200 OK will be logged by Kamailio's acc module. This works perfectly fine in my set up. However, one of the carriers that I'm using sometimes respond with a

[SR-Users] 403 Proxy forbidden replay for invite that send sip gateway

2011-05-18 Thread hala alramli
Hello every body,could you help me ? i bought Geographical DID numbers from gateway provider ,  to  receive calls from pstn    my problem that when gateway send invite my proxy send 403 forbidden ,i dont know why what is wrong ,any help please. this is a track for th gateway invite. my proxy ip:7

Re: [SR-Users] redirect implementation with dispatcher

2011-05-18 Thread alex pappas
Daniel hi, I noticed that I was not using the ds_next_domain(). I was looping inside a ds_select_domain("$avp(s:disp_dstgrp)", "4"). I changed that to: For every gw_group: The first gw_group the $rd is getting fed from ds_select_domain("$avp(s:disp_dstgrp)", "4") and all the other times is ge