Re: [SR-Users] fix_nated_sdp()

2011-01-25 Thread Bernhard Suttner
Hi, thanks for your response. I think I understand the scenario very good - but im not so familiar with the fix_nated_sdp() functionality. Currently the SDP will be modified with the source IP of the message. This does work good but currently I only do that for some special devices (matching t

Re: [SR-Users] RLS question

2011-01-25 Thread Klaus Darilion
Not sure what you problem is, but that works for me: http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance";> presence is uploaded with: Am 24.01.2011 12:19, schrieb "Andrés S. García Ruiz": > > Hi, > > I'm trying to create a RLS "rls-services" documen

Re: [SR-Users] fix_nated_sdp()

2011-01-25 Thread Ovidiu Sas
You need to experiment with nathelper module and while doing that, you need to inspect the SIP messages in order to understand how it works. Only when you fully understand your scenarios, you will be able to properly configure, debg and setup kamailio. Best thing to do here is to use rtpproxy and

Re: [SR-Users] fix_nated_sdp()

2011-01-25 Thread Bernhard Suttner
Hi, thanks for your answer. The question was about, if the fix_nated_sdp() (in the example below) could maybe break something. I am sure, that the fix_nated_sdp() would work in "some" cases but I am not sure, if the function could break something: if (method==INVITE && has_sdp() && nat_uac_

Re: [SR-Users] fix_nated_sdp()

2011-01-25 Thread Carsten Bock
Hi Bernhard, have you checked the SDP which is going to and from the Freeswitch-Server? Is it modified? If yes: You may want to check your NAT-Firewall. A working (but not nice) solution might be to relay the RTP through an proxy in this case... If No: Verify the result of "nat_uac_test": Why is

Re: [SR-Users] fix_nated_sdp()

2011-01-25 Thread Bernhard Suttner
Hi, someone has an idea? Thanks in advance! Best regards, Bernhard -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: sr-users-boun...@lists.sip-router.org [mailto:sr-users-boun...@lists.sip-router.org] Im Auftrag von Bernhard Suttner Gesendet: Montag, 24. Januar 2011 20:38 An: sr-users@lists.sip-router.o

Re: [SR-Users] accounting serial forked transactions with 302 from LCR

2011-01-25 Thread thrillerbee
Will this kind of application require the multi_leg_info modparam for the acc module? I didn't have to use it with OpenSIPS, but I'm running out of ideas with Kamailio. Thanks, Ryan On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 2:29 PM, thrillerbee wrote: > Alex, > > Are you referring to the modparam that would incl

Re: [SR-Users] [kamailio-users] kamailio on amazon

2011-01-25 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Hello, if everything is working fine with the audio, then just ignore the tcpdump warning, since it may capture the packets before the checksum was actually computed in the system. With some network cards you'd have to disable hardware checksum to get rid of those warnings. again, afaik, it i

Re: [SR-Users] RLS question

2011-01-25 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Hello, have you uploaded the rls-services document via the xcap_server module? The document is retrieved from the xcap table and query is done on username and domain columns, not parsing the xml doc to match node attributes. Here is a tutorial with some hints how to upload documents to xcap

Re: [SR-Users] $ua in on_reply route not set?

2011-01-25 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Hello, On 1/24/11 9:46 AM, Bernhard Suttner wrote: Hi, found the problem. The device does sometimes use User-Agent and sometimes Server. Is it better to use $hdr() or the Search() function? $hdr() should be faster and more accurate result, working as well with short names for headers -- e.

Re: [SR-Users] accounting serial forked transactions with 302 from LCR

2011-01-25 Thread thrillerbee
Alex, Are you referring to the modparam that would include accounting CANCELs? If so, no - I'm not doing that because I don't want to account the CANCEL transaction. I only wish to account the INVITE transaction & final response (487). I have found that I can force a 487 response back to the origi

Re: [SR-Users] pdb module best practice

2011-01-25 Thread Henning Westerholt
On Monday 24 January 2011, Thomas Baumann wrote: > the downtime is not a problem, I already have 2 deamons running. > I want to reduce the time , how changes become active. > > 1. update xxx entry > 2. export table to *.csv (5s) > 3. generate *.mmap file (25 seconds) > > So changes will take at l

Re: [SR-Users] SIP between IPv4 and IPv6 agents

2011-01-25 Thread Henning Westerholt
On Tuesday 25 January 2011, Komáromi Péter wrote: > Dear Everybody! > > Many thanks for your help in the past couple of months. > Finally I was able to finish my work with SIP between IPv4 and IPv6 agents. > My diplomawork is ready, and evaluated with the best mark. > > So thank you all! Hi Komá

Re: [SR-Users] Problem reloading carrierroute

2011-01-25 Thread marius zbihlei
On 01/24/2011 10:52 PM, Morten Isaksen wrote: Hi, That solved my problem for now. Thanks. Do you think i could increase fetch_rows if I also increased the private memory? /Morten Hello, Yes, increasing pkg_mem will also allow to increase the fetch_row param. Keep in mind that this is