[SR-Users] Kamailio v3.1.1 Released

Hello, Kamailio SIP Server v3.1.1 is released. This is a maintenance release of latest stable branch, 3.1, that includes fixes since release of v3.1.0. There is no change to database or configuration file required to upgrade to 3.1.1 from 3.1.0 version. If you run v3.1.0 from tarball or packa

[SR-Users] Kamailio 3.1 doesn't start with siptrace module

Hi, I've installed a new instance of Kamailio 3.1 without prb and it works fine. However, in order to activate siptrace, I've added the following lines in the config file, loadmodule "siptrace.so" modparam("siptrace","db_url", DBURL) modparam("siptrace","table","sip_trace") modparam("siptrace","

[SR-Users] using forward() with variables

Hello, We are running Kamailio 1.5. I'm trying to use the forward() function with a variable like this: forward($shv(voip1-edge1)); That fails to parse. I then tried this, which I thought would fail: forward("$shv(voip1-edge1)"); That parsed correctly, but it then failed to resolve the

Re: [SR-Users] SIP between IPv4 and IPv6 agents

Hello! I went through your letters and start as following: --- r...@ubuntu:/home/yeti/rtpproxy# /etc/init.d/kamailio restart Restarting kamailio: kamailioloading modules under /usr/local/lib/kamailio/modules_k/:/usr/local/lib/kamailio/modules/

Re: [SR-Users] When too many calls, calls does not complete, too much delay when placing calls

Oh so sorry, I am using kamailio in one of our production servers and was testing opensip with another :) On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 12:56 AM, Ovidiu Sas wrote: > Run top for all processes and also run: vmstat 2 > That will give you a global view of your system. > As you can see the proxy is not us

Re: [SR-Users] When too many calls, calls does not complete, too much delay when placing calls

Run top for all processes and also run: vmstat 2 That will give you a global view of your system. As you can see the proxy is not using a lot of cpu. BTW, this is the wrong mailing list as it seems that you are running opensips and not kamailio. Regards, Ovidiu Sas On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 11:44

Re: [SR-Users] When too many calls, calls does not complete, too much delay when placing calls

Definition of irony... -- Alex Balashov - Principal Evariste Systems LLC 1170 Peachtree Street 12th Floor, Suite 1200 Atlanta, GA 30309 Tel: +1-678-954-0670 Fax: +1-404-961-1892 Web: http://www.evaristesys.com/ On Dec 2, 2010, at 11:44 AM, Vic Jolin wrote: PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SH

Re: [SR-Users] When too many calls, calls does not complete, too much delay when placing calls

PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEMTIME+ COMMAND 573 root 17 0 37956 1796 1480 R 98.7 0.2 0:04.29 opensips 577 root 18 0 37956 1640 1324 S 82.9 0.2 0:05.38 opensips 575 root 17 0 37956 1688 1372 S 81.9 0.2 0:03.25 opensips 584 root 16 0

Re: [SR-Users] limit on fail-over in lcr?

There was a limit...in how well I had done my job in kamailio.cfg. I had sent it to a failure_route that does not exist within the failure route. Klaus let me to the solution - thanks! --Anders On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 5:24 PM, Juha Heinanen wrote: > Anders writes: > >> I cannot find an answer to

Re: [SR-Users] Trying to drop invite 200ok reply in onreply_route

Hello, Sorry for the late reply, I was a little busy by something else. On 30/11/2010 22:24, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: > Hello, > > do you have > > #!KAMAILIO > > as first line in config file? This is required only for kamailio 3.0, > next versions has the feature of dropping replies by def

Re: [SR-Users] SIP between IPv4 and IPv6 agents

Am 02.12.2010 13:06, schrieb Komáromi Péter: Hi! So if you say it is possible to solve the problem with the only location table, the location_inet4 and location_inet6 is not certainly necessary... do I _have to_ use the 4to6.cfg file from the source of kamailio, or not? When you call force_r

[SR-Users] [Kamailio]: INVITE Authorization

Hello. I have Kamailio ( K in further ) and 2x Asterisk boxes ( A1 and A2 in further ) configured, so UAC registers at K and when it sends a call, it's routed to A1 or A2, balanced. The problem is, that I cannot find how to authorize INVITE requests, so unregistered UAC could not send INVITE requ

Re: [SR-Users] Parallel forking and recording with rtpproxy?

Jeremya wrote: > Hi, > > I'm having some issues with recording in rtpproxy when I parallel fork > an incoming call. > > The scenario is that I want to record incoming calls to a small number > of operators, and the call is converted to an 'all-call' by the local > kamailio instance - parallel forki

[SR-Users] nathelper force_rtp_proxy etc flag "f"

Is the flag "f" of any actual use in force_rtp_proxy, rtp_proxy_offer and rtpproxy_answer? With an upstream proxy the lack of "f" causes problems. Does some problem occur when it is used without an upstream proxy? Thanks Jeremy ___ SIP Express Router

Re: [SR-Users] Releasing Kamailio 3.1.1

Hello, as a point in time, starting with 16:00 today, do not commit anymore to branch 3.1 until v3.1.1 is released later in the evening. If is something special, email me. Thanks, Daniel On 12/1/10 10:48 AM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: Hello, a reminder for everyone that has to push fi

Re: [SR-Users] When too many calls, calls does not complete, too much delay when placing calls

On 12/01/2010 10:33 PM, Vic Jolin wrote: Hi all, Just want to ask if anybody here has come across this problem of mine, when single call proxy is ok, but when you send more traffic to it, calls somehow get stuck, trying to make a new call it takes a lot of time and so it times out. Does any