Re: [SR-Users] kamailio 3.0.3 tls problems

On Sep 28, 2010 at 17:10, Andrei Pelinescu-Onciul wrote: > On Sep 28, 2010 at 18:04, Rouskol Andrey wrote: > > Andrei, > > > > When I recompile kamailio with debug options you specified, it works just > > fine! (no memdbg and memlog options in cfg file). If I compile it as usual, > > it fails.

Re: [SR-Users] [sr-dev] Tutorial: SIP SIMPLE Presence Made Simple with Kamailio 3.1

2010/9/29 Carsten Bock : >> I published a tutorial of how to implement a SIP SIMPLE Presence & XCAP >> server with latest Kamailio/SER version. You can find it at: >> http://bit.ly/btrJij Hi, the DELETE action should also trigger refresh actions (for example it could be a partial DELETE removing

Re: [SR-Users] [Kamailio-Business] Tutorial: SIP SIMPLE Presence Made Simple with Kamailio 3.1

2010/9/29 Daniel-Constantin Mierla : > I published a tutorial of how to implement a SIP SIMPLE Presence & XCAP > server with latest Kamailio/SER version. You can find it at: > http://bit.ly/btrJij Hi, a typo: "body lists - your contacts" should be: "buddy lists - your contacts" :) -- Iña

[SR-Users] Multiple Servers Serving A Domain

Hi, I currently have 1 OpenSer server in front of a number of Asterisk boxes. I want to move to a scenario where I have multiple OpenSer boxes serving the same domain name in front of the Asterisk boxes. The UA could be registered on either of the OpenSer via SRV. When Asterisk has a call for the

Re: [SR-Users] LCR "weight" column question

Ovidiu Sas writes: > The awk version of the script is now integrated in kamctl. thank you very much, -- juha ___ SIP Express Router (SER) and Kamailio (OpenSER) - sr-users mailing list sr-users@lists.sip-router.org http://lists.sip-router.org/cgi-bin/

Re: [SR-Users] LCR "weight" column question

Hello Juha, The awk version of the script is now integrated in kamctl. Regards, Ovidiu Sas On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 6:59 AM, Juha Heinanen wrote: > Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes: > >>   just to mention that kamctl base depends on awk, so this language can >> be used in case something is easie

Re: [SR-Users] [sr-dev] Tutorial: SIP SIMPLE Presence Made Simple with Kamailio 3.1

Hi Daniel, absolutely great! Thank you! Carsten 2010/9/29 Daniel-Constantin Mierla : >  Hello, > > I published a tutorial of how to implement a SIP SIMPLE Presence & XCAP > server with latest Kamailio/SER version. You can find it at: > http://bit.ly/btrJij > > Last build of SIP Communicator soft

Re: [SR-Users] XCAP 3.1 configuration !

Hello, I was writing and just published a complete tutorial about this topic (sent an email few minutes ago), see the docs at: http://bit.ly/btrJij Let me know if works for you. Whenever you have a problem, try to be very descriptive with what does not work. Also, gather message logs and SI

[SR-Users] Tutorial: SIP SIMPLE Presence Made Simple with Kamailio 3.1

Hello, I published a tutorial of how to implement a SIP SIMPLE Presence & XCAP server with latest Kamailio/SER version. You can find it at: http://bit.ly/btrJij Last build of SIP Communicator softphone was used to exemplify some use cases. xcap_server is a new module in upcoming v3.1.0, I

[SR-Users] XCAP 3.1 configuration !

Hi Daniel, Im a kamailio 3.1 (testing noobie) Im trying to setup a simple buddy list supporting presence server. (I gather xcap is the way to go) The simple presence thingy works nicely & instantly (thanks to those #!defines ) But I haven't been able to get this configuration going http://si

Re: [SR-Users] LCR "weight" column question

Daniel-Constantin Mierla writes: > just to mention that kamctl base depends on awk, so this language can > be used in case something is easier to do with it than pure shell. i created awk version of lcr_weight_test script. i'm not using kamctl myself, but if someone is and would like to call

Re: [SR-Users] Dialog timeout route

Hello, On 9/29/10 9:54 AM, Alex Balashov wrote: Greetings, Since the move to name-based routes in Kamailio v3.0, what implications does this have for the 'timeout_route' dialog context attribute? Has this been updated to reflect that change, or do I still have to use numerical routes for i

Re: [SR-Users] kamailio 3.0.3 tls problems

Hello, On 9/28/10 7:29 PM, Ovidiu Sas wrote: Daniel, What do you think about moving the (k) presence modules to standard for the next 3.1 kamailio release? there is the pua_ursrloc that is related to kamailio version of usrloc. The others might be ok, but haven't really looked at all depend

Re: [SR-Users] LCR "weight" column question

just to mention that kamctl base depends on awk, so this language can be used in case something is easier to do with it than pure shell. Cheers, Daniel On 9/28/10 8:53 PM, Juha Heinanen wrote: Ovidiu Sas writes: If the script can be provided in bash, then it would be nice to be integrated i

[SR-Users] Dialog timeout route

Greetings, Since the move to name-based routes in Kamailio v3.0, what implications does this have for the 'timeout_route' dialog context attribute? Has this been updated to reflect that change, or do I still have to use numerical routes for it? Can I now set this as a named constant, e.g.