[SR-Users] Change in RTP Payload time on the fly

2010-09-17 Thread Pranav Desai
Hello, We have a proxy server setup that runs Kamailiov3.0.1 + RTPProxyv1.2.1. Nathelper support has been enabled in Kamailio. On a certain route, we call force_rtp_proxy("z120"), i.e. with resizing parameter 'z' and argument 120ms. During a call where endpoints have negotiated the use of G729,

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio Jabberd Integration

2010-09-17 Thread shoks
On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 6:32 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: > > > On 9/17/10 5:48 AM, shoks wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 10:10 AM, Alex Balashov > wrote: > >> It would be helpful if you could expound in additional on what exactly you >> tried and what did not work for you. > > > I tri

[SR-Users] Usrloc reload problem

2010-09-17 Thread Jan Klepal
Hello, I run kamailio 3.0.3 with location table stored in database (PostgreSQL 8.4.2) with db_mode 2 (write-back) and upon kamailio restart some contacts from database are loaded incorrectly. Messages for those contacts are routed to invalid IP addresses. After some debugging I figured out tha

Re: [SR-Users] strange acc behavior?

2010-09-17 Thread Andrei Pelinescu-Onciul
On Sep 17, 2010 at 12:21, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: > Hello, > > On 9/16/10 11:53 AM, Klaus Darilion wrote: > > > > > >Am 16.09.2010 10:31, schrieb Daniel-Constantin Mierla: > >>Hi Klaus, > >> > >>if you print the value of this avp before and after t_relay(), do you > >>get different value

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio Jabberd Integration

2010-09-17 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
On 9/17/10 5:48 AM, shoks wrote: On Fri, Sep 17, 2010 at 10:10 AM, Alex Balashov mailto:abalas...@evaristesys.com>> wrote: It would be helpful if you could expound in additional on what exactly you tried and what did not work for you. First off, the Kamailio and Jabberd servers are

Re: [SR-Users] strange acc behavior?

2010-09-17 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Hello, On 9/16/10 11:53 AM, Klaus Darilion wrote: Am 16.09.2010 10:31, schrieb Daniel-Constantin Mierla: Hi Klaus, if you print the value of this avp before and after t_relay(), do you get different values? t_relay does not even return for ACK: interesting, I have to test this ... Maybe