Jiri Kuthan writes:
> good news is my company has a solution that can handle this easily
> -- it can be configured to handle routing tasks of complex structures
> at high speed even with large tables. bad news is it is not available
> open-source :(
jiri,
you should know that it is not appropria
On 09/06/2010 01:35 PM, anthony thomas wrote:
I am surprise that you get such a performance with store procedures,
what RDBM are you using?
PostgreSQL. My response was to Daniel's link to the 'prefix' operator
class module, which is for Postgres only.
--
Alex Balashov - Principal
Evariste
> Date: Mon, 6 Sep 2010 14:34:35 +0200
> From: klaus.mailingli...@pernau.at
> To: betergr...@live.com
> CC: sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
> Subject: Re: [SR-Users] please help to register sip phone to kamailio server
> via tls support.
>
>
>
> Am 06.09.2010 11:19, schrieb peter_green lion:
> >
> Date: Mon, 6 Sep 2010 14:34:35 +0200
> From: klaus.mailingli...@pernau.at
> To: betergr...@live.com
> CC: sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
> Subject: Re: [SR-Users] please help to register sip phone to kamailio server
> via tls support.
>
>
>
> Am 06.09.2010 11:19, schrieb peter_green lion:
> >
Thanks Alex,
In our case business logic is out of the system, a different application/server
takes care of it and just "dumps" the results (prefix->route) to the database
that kamailio will load into memory.
I am surprise that you get such a performance with store procedures, what RDBM
are you
We use this in our solutions and search hundreds of millions of routes
with it in 2-3 ms. It works very well, to say the least, because it
is an approach that allows application of complex business logic
(using stored procedures) to the results, something which is much
harder with a more p
Thanks Daniel,
Looks interesting too, I will test it as well and will post the results
regards,
--- On Mon, 9/6/10, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote:
From: Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Subject: Re: [SR-Users] High performance routing options
To: "anthony thomas"
Cc: sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
D
Hello,
On 9/6/10 5:03 PM, anthony thomas wrote:
Hi everyone,
We are looking at offloading routing logic out of our existing
softswitch using openser as an external redirect server. Our routing
logic is not terribly complicated and I think both carrierroute and
LCR modules would be able to h
Hello Henning
--- On Mon, 9/6/10, Henning Westerholt wrote:
> On Monday 06 September 2010, anthony
> thomas wrote:
> > Yes, Indeed we are thinking in using postgres (we
> already use it for our
> > backoffice databases).
> >
> > This sencente confuses me a little bit:
>
> Hello Anthony,
>
>
Hello,
On 9/6/10 6:01 PM, Henning Westerholt wrote:
On Monday 06 September 2010, anthony thomas wrote:
Yes, Indeed we are thinking in using postgres (we already use it for our
backoffice databases).
This sencente confuses me a little bit:
Hello Anthony,
> "some database which supports
On 06.09.2010 13:46, r...@dimension-virtual.com wrote:
dpid priority matchop matchex matchlen subsex replaceex attributes
011 (00|\+)([1-9][0-9]+) 0 (00|\+)([1-9][0-9]+) \2
011 ([5-9][0-9]{8}) 0 ([5-9][0-9]{8}) 34\1
The first rule 'it's supposed' to remove +
On Monday 06 September 2010, anthony thomas wrote:
> Yes, Indeed we are thinking in using postgres (we already use it for our
> backoffice databases).
>
> This sencente confuses me a little bit:
Hello Anthony,
> "some database which supports proper prefix matching (i think postgres is
> able
Hi Henning,
Yes, Indeed we are thinking in using postgres (we already use it for our
backoffice databases).
This sencente confuses me a little bit:
"some database which supports proper prefix matching (i think postgres is able
to do this)"
Once the db is loaded, the prefix matching is done i
good news is my company has a solution that can handle this easily
-- it can be configured to handle routing tasks of complex structures
at high speed even with large tables. bad news is it is not available
open-source :(
-jiri
anthony thomas wrote:
Hi everyone,
We are looking at offloading ro
short update to say that some graphs with more detailed information
were uploaded meanwhile:
http://bit.ly/9r6mB8
Cheers,
Daniel
On 9/4/10 5:39 PM, Meftah Tayeb wrote:
Happy Ser day so!
Le 03/09/2010 17:53, Daniel-Constantin Mierla a écrit :
Hello,
fyi, today are 9 years since first sourc
On Monday 06 September 2010, anthony thomas wrote:
> We are looking at offloading routing logic out of our existing softswitch
> using openser as an external redirect server. Our routing logic is not
> terribly complicated and I think both carrierroute and LCR modules would
> be able to handle it b
Hi everyone,
We are looking at offloading routing logic out of our existing softswitch using
openser as an external redirect server. Our routing logic is not terribly
complicated and I think both carrierroute and LCR modules would be able to
handle it but we have a pretty large route list table
Am 06.09.2010 11:19, schrieb peter_green lion:
i have the same problem when add user-privkey.pem in SIP client, I use
3CX soft phone.
You have to import the self-signed certificate of the root CA which
signed the server certificate. Maybe "cakey.pem" ?
Probably you have to read some certi
Am 06.09.2010 11:00, schrieb Olle E. Johansson:
Route sets and REGISTER doesn't work well together. From RFC3261 section 10.3:
"Registrars MUST ignore the Record-Route header field if it is included in a
REGISTER request. Registrars
MUST NOT include a Record-Route header field in any response
Hi all,
I'm tryting to implement a E164 normalizer using the dialplan module,
by now I have 3 simple rules:
dpid priority matchop matchex matchlen subsex replaceex attributes
011 (00|\+)([1-9][0-9]+) 0 (00|\+)([1-9][0-9]+) \2
011 ([5-9][0-9]{8}) 0 ([5-9][0-9]{
hi all,
I have come back with another problem.
I have install kamailio with tls module supported.
is there any way to check this module run or not ?
thanks for help .
Peter Green.
___
SIP Express Router (SER) a
> Date: Mon, 6 Sep 2010 10:26:38 +0200
> From: klaus.mailingli...@pernau.at
> To: betergr...@live.com
> CC: sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
> Subject: Re: [SR-Users] please help to register sip phone to kamailio server
> via tls support.
>
> > log in :tail -f /var/log/message:
> >
> > Sep 4 05:18
hi all,
no one know this error ?
or no one can help me ?
please suggest if any one know this problem !
From: betergr...@live.com
To: sr-users@lists.sip-router.org
Date: Sat, 4 Sep 2010 12:21:23 +0700
Subject: [SR-Users] please help to register sip phone to kamailio server via
tls support.
Route sets and REGISTER doesn't work well together. From RFC3261 section 10.3:
"Registrars MUST ignore the Record-Route header field if it is included in a
REGISTER request. Registrars
MUST NOT include a Record-Route header field in any response to a REGISTER
request.
A registrar might receive a
The REGISTER request contains the "pre-loaded route set". Pre-loaded
route sets are for security reasons disabled in the default config
(to-tag check):
if (has_totag()) {
# sequential request withing a dialog should
# take the path determined by record-routing
if (loose_route()) {
log in :tail -f /var/log/message:
Sep 4 05:18:50 appliance /usr/local/sbin/kamailio[3117]: ERROR: tls
[tls_server.c:392]: SSL error:error:14094418:SSL
routines:SSL3_READ_BYTES:tlsv1 alert unknown ca
in portgo : certificate validation failure.
It is rather clear - your SIP client does not accep
26 matches
Mail list logo
