Re: [SR-Users] RPID Mod Question

2010-05-05 Thread Ovidiu Sas
Now, that you got everything you need, you should document this on the wiki (so others could find the info without asking on the mailing list). Regards, Ovidiu Sas On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 7:08 PM, dotnetdub wrote: > Thanks Alex.. Excellent information. > Regards, > Stephen. > On 5 May 2010 22:24,

Re: [SR-Users] RPID Mod Question

2010-05-05 Thread dotnetdub
Thanks Alex.. Excellent information. Regards, Stephen. On 5 May 2010 22:24, Alex Balashov wrote: > On 05/05/2010 05:04 PM, dotnetdub wrote: > > >> > The first scenario you have to deal with is one in which the customer may > be sending you RPID already, as when they have sendrpid=yes enabled in

Re: [SR-Users] RPID Mod Question

2010-05-05 Thread Alex Balashov
On 05/05/2010 05:04 PM, dotnetdub wrote: For certain Asterisk customers I want them to be allowed to manage and send their own CLI - we currently pass this onto providers as RPID. For example we also run a multi tenant pbx that uses kamailio as its proxy so it makes sense that we can send the ca

[SR-Users] RPID Mod Question

2010-05-05 Thread dotnetdub
Hi List, For certain Asterisk customers I want them to be allowed to manage and send their own CLI - we currently pass this onto providers as RPID. For example we also run a multi tenant pbx that uses kamailio as its proxy so it makes sense that we can send the callerID from this box to kamailio.

Re: [SR-Users] Rtpproxy behind the NAT

2010-05-05 Thread Klaus Darilion
Hi! indiver wrote: Hello Every one, My network setup is one to one nating of public and private ip. I want to run rtpproxy behind the NAT with in the local IP,but in vain. can't create listener error appears when i run rtpproxy on local ip. Can we run rtpproxy If there is an error message th

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio SCTP support

2010-05-05 Thread Klaus Darilion
Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: Hello, On 5/5/10 9:52 AM, Francisco José Méndez Cirera wrote: Hello, I've downloaded Kamailio 3.0.0 (the last release) and I´ve seen it´s possible downloading a "binary tar.gz" or the source to compile directly. I would like to know if the binary has enabled s

Re: [SR-Users] new features: extended cfg preprocessor directives

2010-05-05 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Hello, On 5/5/10 9:03 PM, Alex Balashov wrote: Daniel, Can values of a preprocessor ID be tested in the preprocessor itself, like #if? by now there is no #!if, only #!ifdef/#!ifndef which return true/false if the ID was defined. Cheers, Daniel Thanks, -- Alex On 05/05/2010 02:55 PM,

Re: [SR-Users] Simple Trunkig with Kamailio

2010-05-05 Thread Klaus Darilion
Jared Martin wrote: Ok, this is probably an easy question: Say I have my kamailio server set up and all of my voip clients are gleefully calling each other... but now I want to connect them to the PSTN. Can I set up kamailo to trunk calls using a few grandstream gateways? or is Asterisk necce

Re: [SR-Users] new features: extended cfg preprocessor directives

2010-05-05 Thread Alex Balashov
Daniel, Can values of a preprocessor ID be tested in the preprocessor itself, like #if? Thanks, -- Alex On 05/05/2010 02:55 PM, Daniel-Constantin Mierla wrote: Hello, just to let you know about some new features related to config preprocessing. 3.0 added config preprocessor directives suc

[SR-Users] new features: extended cfg preprocessor directives

2010-05-05 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Hello, just to let you know about some new features related to config preprocessing. 3.0 added config preprocessor directives such as 'include_file' and 'define'. But the define could be used only to control which parts of config file are active. Several days ago I committed the code to allo

[SR-Users] Rtpproxy behind the NAT

2010-05-05 Thread indiver
Hello Every one, My network setup is one to one nating of public and private ip. I want to run rtpproxy behind the NAT with in the local IP,but in vain. can't create listener error appears when i run rtpproxy on local ip. Can we run rtpproxy behind the NAT with local IP. If possible can any one

Re: [SR-Users] Error with 'Contact' field replacing

2010-05-05 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Hello, I found it hard to follow what is wrong here, can you get the SIP traffic on kamailio server and post it here? You can use: ngrep -d any -qt -W byline port 5060 on your kamailio server. Then we can see if it something wrong there and who is responsible for it. Kamailio is hardly chan

Re: [SR-Users] kamailio and presence_xml parse error

2010-05-05 Thread Francesco
Thanks a lot...i'm waiting for you. In the meanwhile, i've upgraded libxml2 at the last version, 2.7.7. Looking deeply seems that the error is related to function xmlParseMemory, into parser.c of libxml2. But i've no knowledge of C, than i need to stop here :) Thanks. :: Francesco Colista :: Emai

Re: [SR-Users] sr-users Digest, Vol 60, Issue 6

2010-05-05 Thread Rothe, Marcus, D22-WHV
like to know if the binary has enabled support for SCTP by default. If it?s enabled by default, how can I activate it (I can?t find any option related to sctp in kamailio.cfg) ? If it isn?t enabled by default, which are the dependencies? Is there a document or something with at least

Re: [SR-Users] kamailio and presence_xml parse error

2010-05-05 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Hello, at the first sight seems the size of the xml doc is bigger that it should be. I will look deeper at it, just some busy days here currently. Cheers, Daniel On 5/3/10 3:54 PM, Francesco wrote: Thx for reply. This is what i get with patch applied (is not pretty readable, but what i can

Re: [SR-Users] Authentication SER + RADIUS + LDAP

2010-05-05 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Hello, On 5/4/10 10:03 AM, Pablo Ros wrote: Hello, We have a LDAP database with many users information and this is the one we use to implement most of our services; on the contrary we have SER working with a SQL data base. Our intention was to make also the authentication against LDAP. After

Re: [SR-Users] Kamailio SCTP support

2010-05-05 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Hello, On 5/5/10 9:52 AM, Francisco José Méndez Cirera wrote: Hello, I've downloaded Kamailio 3.0.0 (the last release) and I´ve seen it´s possible downloading a "binary tar.gz" or the source to compile directly. I would like to know if the binary has enabled support for SCTP by default. If

Re: [SR-Users] NAT Traversal IPTel example

2010-05-05 Thread Daniel-Constantin Mierla
Hello On 5/5/10 9:00 AM, Andy Savage wrote: Hi there, I've been setting up SER for a testing server on the local network behind a NAT. I'm having problems understanding how to setup the NAT routing in the configuration file. My understanding is that IPTel has already setup advanced NAT rout

[SR-Users] Kamailio SCTP support

2010-05-05 Thread Francisco José Méndez Cirera
Hello, I've downloaded Kamailio 3.0.0 (the last release) and I´ve seen it´s possible downloading a "binary tar.gz" or the source to compile directly. I would like to know if the binary has enabled support for SCTP by default. If it´s enabled by default, how can I activate it (I can´t find any opt

[SR-Users] Authentication SER + RADIUS + LDAP

2010-05-05 Thread Pablo Ros
Hello, We have a LDAP database with many users information and this is the one we use to implement most of our services; on the contrary we have SER working with a SQL data base. Our intention was to make also the authentication against LDAP. After some research, we've seen there's no specific mod

[SR-Users] Simple Trunkig with Kamailio

2010-05-05 Thread Jared Martin
Ok, this is probably an easy question: Say I have my kamailio server set up and all of my voip clients are gleefully calling each other... but now I want to connect them to the PSTN. Can I set up kamailo to trunk calls using a few grandstream gateways? or is Asterisk neccesary? Sorry if the answe

[SR-Users] NAT Traversal IPTel example

2010-05-05 Thread Andy Savage
Hi there, I've been setting up SER for a testing server on the local network behind a NAT. I'm having problems understanding how to setup the NAT routing in the configuration file. My understanding is that IPTel has already setup advanced NAT routing on the free service (as per the website). Is