[sr-dev] Re: [kamailio/kamailio] cmake glitches (Issue #4317)

2025-07-28 Thread Henning Westerholt via sr-dev
henningw left a comment (kamailio/kamailio#4317) Most of the suggestions/remarks here were adapted already in git master branch. If necessary it can be further discussed on the developer mailing list, closing it. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio

[sr-dev] Re: [kamailio/kamailio] cmake glitches (Issue #4317)

2025-07-28 Thread Henning Westerholt via sr-dev
Closed #4317 as completed. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/4317#event-18848670003 You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Message ID: ___ Kamailio - Development

[sr-dev] Re: [kamailio/kamailio] cmake glitches (Issue #4317)

2025-07-22 Thread Дилян Палаузов via sr-dev
dilyanpalauzov left a comment (kamailio/kamailio#4317) I found https://www.kamailio.org/wikidocs/tutorials/cmake/custom/#module_group_name . Indeed, when I enter invalid name, all possible groups are shown. -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamai

[sr-dev] Re: [kamailio/kamailio] cmake glitches (Issue #4317)

2025-07-22 Thread Дилян Палаузов via sr-dev
dilyanpalauzov left a comment (kamailio/kamailio#4317) MODULE_GROUP_NAME now can be entered as string. Where are the available group names documented? -- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/4317#issuecomment-3102230249 You are receivin

[sr-dev] Re: [kamailio/kamailio] cmake glitches (Issue #4317)

2025-07-22 Thread Xenofon Karamanos via sr-dev
xkaraman left a comment (kamailio/kamailio#4317) Hey @dilyanpalauzov , Can you check https://github.com/xkaraman/kamailio/tree/cmake for the multiple `MODULE_GROUP_NAME` values and verify that it now works as you expected? `FLAVOUR` was also removed, and the `XSLT_*` options were already fixed

[sr-dev] Re: [kamailio/kamailio] cmake glitches (Issue #4317)

2025-07-17 Thread Xenofon Karamanos via sr-dev
xkaraman left a comment (kamailio/kamailio#4317) > In the 6.0 branch the FLAVOUR option allows in cmake-gui (ccmake) setting > `kamailio` as only option. As it is no-op, it should not be displayed in > cmake-gui. You are right. this was kept as part of the translation of make to cmake in case

[sr-dev] Re: [kamailio/kamailio] cmake glitches (Issue #4317)

2025-07-13 Thread Дилян Палаузов via sr-dev
dilyanpalauzov left a comment (kamailio/kamailio#4317) I consider these NO_… OFF options as confusing, as they involve double negations. Some people, depending on their native language, can consider double negation to mean single negation. Is with NO_A=OFF support for A enabled or disabled?