> On Dec 13, 2024, at 6:35 am, Victor Seva via sr-dev
> wrote:
>
> Are you using $ci by any chance?
D'oh! You nailed it. It was part of my log_prefix, which I completely forgot
about. Sorry for the stupid question; it was early in te morning.
-- Alex
--
Alex Balashov
Principal Consultant
E
Hi,
When evaluating the value of shared variables (initialised via `pv` modparam
`shvset`) in event_route[xhttp:reply], e.g. $shv(x), I get:
Dec 13 11:21:12 proxy kamailio[22288]: ERROR: pv [pv_core.c:754]:
pv_get_callid(): cannot parse Call-Id header
Any advice appreciated! I assume that $shv
Hi, I haven't found anything more on this and agree it can be closed.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/3297#issuecomment-2366897799
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID: _
Closed #3297 as completed.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/3297#event-14355222437
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID: ___
Kamailio (SER) - Devel
As an aside:
- A 180 (or any non-100 1xx message) doesn't inherently cause an early dialog
to come about; the distinguishing feature of a dialog-forming response is a
To-tag;
- A 200 response does not cause a dialog to be confirmed; it tentatively causes
it to be established, pending an end-to
There are some real risks with taking dialog state transitions into your own
hands via this rather crude method.
The life cycle of a transaction, and therefore a dialog (insofar as a dialog
depends on the outcome of one or more transactions), can proceed, and
transition from stage to stage, in
Closed #3526 as completed.
--
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/kamailio/kamailio/issues/3526#event-10894780496
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Message ID: ___
Kamailio (SER) - Devel
