Re: [squid-users] Content injection

2017-10-01 Thread Antony Stone
On Sunday 01 October 2017 at 06:26:01, Jeffrey Merkey wrote: > On 9/30/17, Amos Jeffries wrote: > > > > For the record: > > > > Please be aware that HTTP documents are protected by international > > copyright laws. Altering other peoples content is illegal in all > > countries signatory to the B

Re: [squid-users] Content injection

2017-10-01 Thread Amos Jeffries
On 01/10/17 21:42, Antony Stone wrote: On Sunday 01 October 2017 at 06:26:01, Jeffrey Merkey wrote: On 9/30/17, Amos Jeffries wrote: For the record: Please be aware that HTTP documents are protected by international copyright laws. Altering other peoples content is illegal in all countries s

Re: [squid-users] SSL Bump Failures with Google and Wikipedia [SOLVED]

2017-10-01 Thread L A Walsh
Jeffrey Merkey wrote: One caveat about this I discovered that there are quite a few websites which completely ignore the Accept-Encoding request header and just go ahead and send gzip html data even when you tell it not to. Oh well, back to the drawing board. --- But didn't your bump pro

Re: [squid-users] SSL Bump Failures with Google and Wikipedia [SOLVED]

2017-10-01 Thread Yuri
Opera, AFAIK, now abandoned and can contain obsolete CA bundle (not sure it uses system CA storage). So, it seems this is quite different issue. 02.10.2017 5:46, L A Walsh пишет: > Jeffrey Merkey wrote: >> >> One caveat about this I discovered that there are quite a few websites >> which complet

Re: [squid-users] Content injection

2017-10-01 Thread Amos Jeffries
On 02/10/17 02:33, B Hirsch wrote: Any legal references someone could point to? > "HTML" can contain almost any type of work, so it is hard to know in advance exactly which of the clauses or exemptions apply. Amos ___

Re: [squid-users] Content injection

2017-10-01 Thread Yuri
Hm, Amos. But 1986 - it is ancient in 2017, yes? Over 20 years. Ethernity in IT. 02.10.2017 8:47, Amos Jeffries пишет: > On 02/10/17 02:33, B Hirsch wrote: >> Any legal references someone could point to? > > > > > > "HTML" can contain

Re: [squid-users] Content injection

2017-10-01 Thread Yuri
In addition, hypertext is not a literary work, as it seems to me. Moreover, it is somehow attracted to the ears, do not you think? 02.10.2017 8:47, Amos Jeffries пишет: > On 02/10/17 02:33, B Hirsch wrote: >> Any legal references someone could point to? > > > >

Re: [squid-users] Content injection

2017-10-01 Thread Yuri
And it's still said softly - it's arrtacted to the ears. Speech, as I understand it, is about the insertion of advertising banners in the pages given to clients from the proxy (cache). What are the literary works and copyright? The insertion of advertising is money, and considerable. If op is to de

Re: [squid-users] Content injection

2017-10-01 Thread Amos Jeffries
On 02/10/17 15:49, Yuri wrote: Hm, Amos. But 1986 - it is ancient in 2017, yes? Over 20 years. Ethernity in IT. Yuri, you may want to take that up with a lawyer. " Berne Notification No. 162 Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works Accession by the Russian Federa

Re: [squid-users] Make all IPv6 ips on system to be used as a proxy

2017-10-01 Thread xpro6000
I did some research on tproxy, this is pretty much the Linux firewall right? There is not much documentation about it online On Sat, Sep 30, 2017 at 5:21 PM, Eliezer Croitoru wrote: > Anyone mentioned tproxy? > It works for me... > > Eliezer > > > http://ngtech.co.il/lmgtfy/ > Linux System

Re: [squid-users] Make all IPv6 ips on system to be used as a proxy

2017-10-01 Thread Amos Jeffries
On 02/10/17 18:03, xpro6000 wrote: I did some research on tproxy, this is pretty much the Linux firewall right? There is not much documentation about it online No, netfilter/iptables is the Linux firewall. TPROXY is a feature of the Linux TCP stack. BSD stacks have a different name for it,

Re: [squid-users] Content injection

2017-10-01 Thread Amos Jeffries
On 02/10/17 15:51, Yuri wrote: In addition, hypertext is not a literary work, as it seems to me. Moreover, it is somehow attracted to the ears, do not you think? Lawyers told me otherwise: "A website is copyrighted at the time of development. So putting the copyright notice on the bottom of