Re: [squid-users] host header forgery false positives

2016-02-16 Thread Yuri Voinov
I confirm - I've seen this issue in cache.log too. 16.02.16 11:25, Amos Jeffries пишет: On 16/02/2016 3:12 p.m., Jason Haar wrote: On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 2:48 AM, Amos Jeffries wrote: Thanks for the reminder. I dont recall seeing a bug report being made. Though Jason has sent me a more detai

Re: [squid-users] about sni

2016-02-16 Thread HackXBack
okay now i have this acl step1 at_step SslBump1 ssl_bump peek step1 ssl_bump splice all but all https connections is TCP_TUNNEL/200 i need only sni requests that cant be bumped to be TCP_TUNNEL/200 !!! and the other request must bumped and decrypt !! -- View this message in context: htt

Re: [squid-users] Reverse DNS Lookup for client IPs

2016-02-16 Thread Stefan Hölzle
I had to try overwriting the directives in the squid.conf since it was the quickest and most obvious solution to me. I can assure you, it works. On 15.02.2016 10:59, Amos Jeffries wrote: > On 15/02/2016 10:51 p.m., Stefan Hölzle wrote: >> For a quick fix, I defined the two directives in my squid.c

[squid-users] [squid-announce] Squid 3.5.14 is available

2016-02-16 Thread Amos Jeffries
The Squid HTTP Proxy team is very pleased to announce the availability of the Squid-3.5.14 release! This release is a security release resolving one major vulnerability and several other bugs found in the prior Squid releases. The major changes to be aware of: * SQUID-2016:1 - Remote Denial o

[squid-users] [squid-announce] Squid 4.0.6 beta is available

2016-02-16 Thread Amos Jeffries
The Squid HTTP Proxy team is very pleased to announce the availability of the Squid-4.0.6 release! This release is a security release resolving one major vulnerability and several other bugs found in the prior Squid releases. NP: this release announcement also covers 4.0.5 change details. Th

[squid-users] [squid-announce] [ADVISORY] SQUID-2016:1 Remote Denial of Service issue in SSL/TLS processing.

2016-02-16 Thread Amos Jeffries
__ Squid Proxy Cache Security Update Advisory SQUID-2016:1 __ Advisory ID:SQUID-2016:1 Date: February 16, 2016 Summary:Remote Denial of

[squid-users] Mutual authenticated SSL

2016-02-16 Thread lucas2
Hi List, I am using Squid 3.1.23 as a reverse proxy. Client authentication to backend servers is mandatory. All backend servers use client certificate based authentication which I configure as follows: cache_peer (...) ssl sslcert=/etc/squid/client-certs/client-cert.pem (...) The .pem file is

[squid-users] Rock datastore, CFLAGS and a crash that (may be) known

2016-02-16 Thread Jester Purtteman
Greetings Squid users, With 3.5.14 out and activating CFLAGS, I am getting into trouble. Funny too, I spent a lot of time wondering why it wasn't adding CFLAGS in earlier builds. In any event, I have a 3.5.13 instance configured as follows: ./configure --prefix=/usr --localstatedir=/var

Re: [squid-users] Mutual authenticated SSL

2016-02-16 Thread Amos Jeffries
On 17/02/2016 3:11 a.m., luc...@dds.nl wrote: > Hi List, > > I am using Squid 3.1.23 as a reverse proxy. Client authentication to > backend servers is mandatory. All backend servers use client certificate > based authentication which I configure as follows: > cache_peer (...) ssl sslcert=/etc/squi

Re: [squid-users] Rock datastore, CFLAGS and a crash that (may be) known

2016-02-16 Thread Eliezer Croitoru
Before digging into the details of the issue, can you supply the OS details? What OS are you using? What distribution? 32 or 64 bit? can you also add the output of "squid -v" for both 3.5.14 and 3.5.13 ? Thanks, Eliezer On 16/02/2016 16:32, Jester Purtteman wrote: Greetings Squid users, With 3

Re: [squid-users] Rock datastore, CFLAGS and a crash that (may be) known

2016-02-16 Thread Amos Jeffries
On 17/02/2016 3:32 a.m., Jester Purtteman wrote: > Greetings Squid users, > > > > With 3.5.14 out and activating CFLAGS, I am getting into trouble. Funny > too, I spent a lot of time wondering why it wasn't adding CFLAGS in earlier > builds. In any event, I have a 3.5.13 instance configured a

Re: [squid-users] Rock datastore, CFLAGS and a crash that (may be) known

2016-02-16 Thread Marcus Kool
On 02/16/2016 12:32 PM, Jester Purtteman wrote: ./configure CFLAGS="-march=core2 -mcx16 -msahf -mno-movbe -mno-aes -mno-pclmul -mno-popcnt -mno-sse4 -msse4.1" CXXFLAGS="${CFLAGS}" --with-pthreads --prefix=/usr --localstatedir=/var --libexecdir=/usr/lib/squid--srcdir=. --datadir=/usr/s

[squid-users] The server does not support Forward Secrecy with the reference browsers...

2016-02-16 Thread Sebastien.Boulianne
Hi all, http://imgur.com/PI1PRlB Can it be fixed with Squid ? If yes, how ? Thanks you very much for your answer. Sébastien Boulianne Administrateur réseau & système / Network & System Administrator (Windows & Linux). Gestion des infrastructures / Infrastructure Management. CCNA / CompTIA Serv

Re: [squid-users] about sni

2016-02-16 Thread HackXBack
why SNI connection not work ? any applications on mobile android or apple is not working when doing ssl_bump !! maybe i miss some thing ? otherwise bumping https is unusefull !! -- View this message in context: http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/about-sni-tp4676005p4676031.html

Re: [squid-users] The server does not support Forward Secrecy with the reference browsers...

2016-02-16 Thread Yuri Voinov
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Aha, here is it: http://wiki.squid-cache.org/ConfigExamples/Intercept/SslBumpExplicit#Hardening 17.02.16 1:32, sebastien.boulia...@cpu.ca пишет: > > Hi all, > > > > http://imgur.com/PI1PRlB > > > > Can it be fixed with Squid ? If yes, how ? >

Re: [squid-users] about sni

2016-02-16 Thread Yuri Voinov
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 I suggest, more correctly term is: "Not ALL applications on apple or android works". Yes? Also I suggest you meet with pinned connections. ;) They can't be bumped. For now ;) 17.02.16 1:14, HackXBack пишет: > why SNI connection not work ? > an

Re: [squid-users] about sni

2016-02-16 Thread HackXBack
its okay i dont want to bump them !! but at least make them work !! most applications used pinned connections !! most of them is not working at all !! connection cant established at all !! -- View this message in context: http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/about-sni-tp4676005p46

Re: [squid-users] about sni

2016-02-16 Thread Yuri Voinov
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Wow,wow, not most and any ;) Use splice, Luke :) This thing for it. :) 17.02.16 1:20, HackXBack пишет: > its okay i dont want to bump them !! but at least make them work !! > most applications used pinned connections !! > most of them is not

Re: [squid-users] about sni

2016-02-16 Thread Alex Rousskov
On 02/15/2016 06:13 PM, Amos Jeffries wrote: > Also, terminate seems to require > similar operations to bump, so after the step 2 peek it may not work > reliably. The terminate action (i.e., TCP connection(s) closure) should not require anything and should be usable at all steps, regardless of the

Re: [squid-users] The server does not support Forward Secrecy with the reference browsers...

2016-02-16 Thread Mike
I've found that relates to httpd and not the proxy itself. This is an easy fix though. Modify /etc/httpd/conf.d/ssl.conf * SSLProtocol all -SSLv2 (most modern linux OS already has this by default but add it if it is not found) * SSLCipherSuite ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA:ECDHE-RSA-AES128

Re: [squid-users] The server does not support Forward Secrecy with the reference browsers...

2016-02-16 Thread Yuri Voinov
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 That's it, yes, for Apache. 17.02.16 1:50, Mike пишет: > I've found that relates to httpd and not the proxy itself. This is an easy > fix though. > Modify /etc/httpd/conf.d/ssl.conf > > * > > SSLProtocol all -SSLv2 (most modern linux OS alre

Re: [squid-users] ssl-bump

2016-02-16 Thread Alex Samad
Bump... No comments ? On 10 February 2016 at 09:55, Alex Samad wrote: > auth_param negotiate program /usr/bin/ntlm_auth > --helper-protocol=gss-spnego --configfile /etc/samba/smb.conf-squid > auth_param negotiate children 20 startup=0 idle=3 > auth_param negotiate keep_alive on > auth_param ntlm

[squid-users] How to block "Secure Renegotiation IS supported" with Squid.

2016-02-16 Thread Sebastien.Boulianne
Hi all, I just did a SSL Analyzer with comodo. Their site told me that I support « Secure Renegotiation IS supported, Vulnerable DoS » Is it a way to block that with Squid ? Thanks you very much in advance. Sébastien ___ squid-users mailing list sq

[squid-users] Squid configuration help

2016-02-16 Thread nando mendonca
Hi All, Currently i have Squid 3.5.12 setup with LDAP Authentication and with groups. If a certain user is apart of a certain group they can access sites that are listed in the allowed list, otherwise access is denied for all other sites. I have a new requirement to allow all LDAP authenticated u

Re: [squid-users] Squid configuration help

2016-02-16 Thread Amos Jeffries
On 17/02/2016 12:33 p.m., nando mendonca wrote: > Hi All, > > Currently i have Squid 3.5.12 setup with LDAP Authentication and with > groups. If a certain user is apart of a certain group they can access sites > that are listed in the allowed list, otherwise access is denied for all > other sites.

[squid-users] Delay Pools and HTTPS on Squid 3.x

2016-02-16 Thread Hery Martin
Hello everybody: Since a few months ago I'm using squid to provide a solution as small business proxy in the network of my work place. I'm from Cuba, in our country the Internet is a very limited resource. I have only one link of 2Mbps to share with 20 ~ 25 users (even with my network have more t

Re: [squid-users] Delay Pools and HTTPS on Squid 3.x

2016-02-16 Thread Dan Charlesworth
It's been a while since I've looked at this—because the software we use to generate our squid.conf just works around now—but we found that Squid 3 would only enforce exactly half the configured rate on HTTP requests but enforce the full rate on HTTPS requests. So we now make two delay pools for ev

Re: [squid-users] Delay Pools and HTTPS on Squid 3.x

2016-02-16 Thread Hery Martin
Hey djch Thanks for your quick reply... Anyway, I know that delay pools are implemented at software layer, but maybe the error was just a simple mistake porting the old squid 2 project. Even when these days we have tools to do this more efficiently like TC-CBQ, in environments where squid works as

Re: [squid-users] Delay Pools and HTTPS on Squid 3.x

2016-02-16 Thread Eliezer Croitoru
Hey Martin, I was wondering if you had the chance of trying to enforce some QOS policy on the OS level? Also what OS and distribution are you using? Eliezer On 17/02/2016 03:37, Hery Martin wrote: Hello everybody: Since a few months ago I'm using squid to provide a solution as small busines

[squid-users] RPMs release due to [ADVISORY] SQUID-2016:1 Remote Denial of Service issue in SSL/TLS processing.

2016-02-16 Thread Eliezer Croitoru
Due to the Security Update Advisory I am releasing RPMs for: - SLES 12 SP1 - OpenSUSE Leap 42.1 - CentOS 6 + 7 - Oracle Linux 6 + 7 CentOS and Oracle Linux EL6 version includes RPMs only for the 3.5 tree and for both 64 and 32 bit. All others was built only for 64 bit and also includes 4.0.6 RP