Re: [squid-users] acl for redirect

2015-06-26 Thread FredB
Mike, you can also to try the dev branch https://github.com/e2guardian/e2guardian/tree/develop SSLMITM works now. The request from the client is intercepted, a spoofed certificate supplied for the target site and an encrypted connection made back to the client. A separate encrypted connection

Re: [squid-users] Logging of 'indirect' requests, e.g. involving NAT or VPN

2015-06-26 Thread Henry S. Thompson
Leonardo Rodrigues writes: > Em 24/06/15 15:28, Henry S. Thompson escreveu: >> I've searched the documentation and mailing list archives w/o success, >> and am not competent to read the source, so asking here: what is >> logged as the 'remotehost' in Squid logs when a request that has been >> enca

Re: [squid-users] Logging of 'indirect' requests, e.g. involving NAT or VPN

2015-06-26 Thread Antony Stone
On Friday 26 Jun 2015 at 09:51, Henry S. Thompson wrote: > > logs will show the IP address that reached squid, ie. the source > > address of the connection. If that was NATted, squid will never know > > (and thus is not able to log) the original address before the NAT. > > That's what I assum

Re: [squid-users] Logging of 'indirect' requests, e.g. involving NAT or VPN

2015-06-26 Thread Henry S. Thompson
Antony Stone writes: > On Friday 26 Jun 2015 at 09:51, Henry S. Thompson wrote: > >> > logs will show the IP address that reached squid, ie. the source >> > address of the connection. If that was NATted, squid will never know >> > (and thus is not able to log) the original address before the N

Re: [squid-users] Logging of 'indirect' requests, e.g. involving NAT or VPN

2015-06-26 Thread Antony Stone
On Friday 26 Jun 2015 at 10:42, Henry S. Thompson wrote: > Antony Stone writes: > > > > It's entirely plausible (I'd even say common) for VPN clients to get > > 192.168 addresses; also if there's a NATting router in the path > > and Squid is logging its address, that could easily be 192.168..

Re: [squid-users] Reg - Squid can cache the chrome OS updates.

2015-06-26 Thread ViSolve Squid
Thanks for your valuable information Amos. Regards, Nithi On Friday 26 June 2015 10:48 AM, Amos Jeffries wrote: On 26/06/2015 4:36 p.m., Squid List wrote: Hi, Is the Squid can cache Microsoft Updates and IOS Updates? If its cache means, please help me out for cache Chrome OS updates in lates

Re: [squid-users] acl for redirect

2015-06-26 Thread Amos Jeffries
On 26/06/2015 8:40 p.m., FredB wrote: > Mike, you can also to try the dev branch > https://github.com/e2guardian/e2guardian/tree/develop > SSLMITM works now. The request from the client is intercepted, a spoofed > certificate supplied for > the target site and an encrypted connection made back

Re: [squid-users] acl for redirect

2015-06-26 Thread FredB
Thanks Amos, I will discuss this in more details with the dev of SSLMITM in E2 Fred ___ squid-users mailing list squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users

Re: [squid-users] Logging of 'indirect' requests, e.g. involving NAT or VPN

2015-06-26 Thread Henry S. Thompson
Antony Stone writes: > Imagine the following setup: > > Organisation has a bunch of servers (maybe at their office in a > server room, maybe in a data centre, doesn't matter which), some of > which have public IPs, but all of which have private IPs on an > internal subnet (for system management pu

[squid-users] ufdbGuard 1.31-13 released

2015-06-26 Thread Marcus Kool
ufdbGuard, the fastest and free URL filter for Squid, has a new patch release. Patch 13 resolves: + new installation procedure for Solaris 10 and 11 - with much appreciated help from Yuri Voinov + various overblocking/underblocking issues with complex ACLs + redirection of URLs with HTTPS on Squ

Re: [squid-users] Mikrotik and Squid Transparent

2015-06-26 Thread Alex Samad
aren't squid and nat box different ? that was my presumption.. On 25 June 2015 at 19:07, Amos Jeffries wrote: > On 25/06/2015 12:45 p.m., Alex Samad wrote: >> Hi >> >> why this, doesn't this block all traffic getting to the squid port. >> iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -p tcp --dport $SQUIDPORT

Re: [squid-users] Mikrotik and Squid Transparent

2015-06-26 Thread Amos Jeffries
On 27/06/2015 12:14 a.m., Alex Samad wrote: > aren't squid and nat box different ? that was my presumption.. > Best not to. The dst-IP:port on the TCP packets entering the Squid machine is where Squid will send the outgoing server requests. If that dst-IP is the IP of the Squid machine itself yo

Re: [squid-users] acl for redirect - re Fred

2015-06-26 Thread Mike
Yes we already have that version installed, that is the version having these issues. [root@Server1 ~]# e2guardian -v e2guardian 3.0.4 On 6/26/2015 3:40 AM, FredB wrote: Mike, you can also to try the dev branch https://github.com/e2guardian/e2guardian/tree/develop SSLMITM works now. The reque

Re: [squid-users] acl for redirect - re Amos

2015-06-26 Thread Mike
Amos, I would like to use e2guardian if possible, and after checking it out, http://www.google.com/webhp?nord=1 does force the insecure, but previous entries attempted just cause all searches to loop back to that same url instead of passing it along. We could use a regex option in squid, but

Re: [squid-users] acl for redirect

2015-06-26 Thread Mike
Nevermind... I found another fix within e2guardian: etc/e2guardian/lists/urlregexplist Added this entry: # Disable Google SSL Search # allows e2g to filter searches properly "^https://www.google.[a-z]{2,6}(.*)"->"http://www.google.com/webhp?nord=1"; This means whenever google.com or www.google.

Re: [squid-users] assertion failed: comm.cc:178: "fd_table[conn->fd].halfClosedReader != NULL"

2015-06-26 Thread HackXBack
acl Y-TUBE dstdomain .googlevideo.com range_offset_limit -1 Y-TUBE this conf make the assertion bug, we need a solution am still waiting Amos Thanks. -- View this message in context: http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/assertion-failed-comm-cc-178-fd-table-conn-fd-halfClosedRea

Re: [squid-users] Mikrotik and Squid Transparent

2015-06-26 Thread Alex Samad
Hi Sorry missing something here. I thought this was a mikrotek rtr , presumably acting as a default gateway for the local lan to the internet. it has a DNAT rule to capture all internet traffic that is port 80 (and presumably at some point in time port 443) and it DNATS it to the SQUID box. and

Re: [squid-users] Mikrotik and Squid Transparent

2015-06-26 Thread Amos Jeffries
On 27/06/2015 10:02 a.m., Alex Samad wrote: > Hi > > Sorry missing something here. > > I thought this was a mikrotek rtr , presumably acting as a default > gateway for the local lan to the internet. > it has a DNAT rule to capture all internet traffic that is port 80 > (and presumably at some poi

Re: [squid-users] assertion failed: comm.cc:178: "fd_table[conn->fd].halfClosedReader != NULL"

2015-06-26 Thread Yuri Voinov
Better to use: # Adobe/Java and other updates acl adobe_java_updates urlpath_regex "/usr/local/squid/etc/urlregex.updates" # Youtube & CDN store rewrite ACLs acl store_rewrite_list urlpath_regex \/(watch\?|get_video|videoplayback\?) \.(jp(e?g|e|2)|gif|png|tiff?|bmp|ico|webp|flv|f4f|mp4)\? \/ad