[squid-users] Help with Squid Proxy on AWS Nat Instance.

2015-03-03 Thread laxcat
I have squid installed on a NAT instance in AWS. I installed squid using yum. The OS is amazon linux. When squid is not running I am able to send traffic through the nat box from private subnets but when I start squid I am not. This is the default iptables rules: [admin@box1 ~]# iptables -t

[squid-users] WARNING: disk-cache maximum object size is too large for mem-cache: 102400.00 KB > 90.00 KB

2015-03-03 Thread johnzeng
Hi : Thanks Amos Jeffries, i updated to squid 3.5.2 and tested QQ and other application at two different environment ( between intercept and tproxy ) in according to your advisement . result is ok as your saying . Thanks again . but i checked cache log and found ( WARNING: disk-cache maximum

Re: [squid-users] Dual-stack IPv4/IPv6 captive portal

2015-03-03 Thread Steve Hill
On 02.03.15 02:33, Amos Jeffries wrote: These people are plain wrong about how the basic protocol works and yet they are treated with must-accept policies by so many networks. Yep, one of the really big problems we have is the "it works when we're not using the proxy, so the proxy must be b

Re: [squid-users] Help with Squid Proxy on AWS Nat Instance.

2015-03-03 Thread Amos Jeffries
On 4/03/2015 2:30 a.m., laxcat wrote: > I have squid installed on a NAT instance in AWS. I installed squid using > yum. The OS is amazon linux. When squid is not running I am able to send > traffic through the nat box from private subnets but when I start squid I am > not. Please follow this

Re: [squid-users] Help with Squid Proxy on AWS Nat Instance.

2015-03-03 Thread Yuri Voinov
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Feel free to use Squid Wiki: http://wiki.squid-cache.org/ConfigExamples/Intercept 03.03.15 19:30, laxcat пишет: > I have squid installed on a NAT instance in AWS. I installed squid > using yum. The OS is amazon linux. When squid is not running I

Re: [squid-users] WARNING: disk-cache maximum object size is too large for mem-cache: 102400.00 KB > 90.00 KB

2015-03-03 Thread Amos Jeffries
On 4/03/2015 3:12 a.m., johnzeng wrote: > > Hi : > > Thanks Amos Jeffries, i updated to squid 3.5.2 and > > tested QQ and other application at two different environment ( between > intercept and tproxy ) in according to your advisement . > > result is ok as your saying . > > Thanks again . >

[squid-users] wccp2_service_info fails on more than one port number

2015-03-03 Thread Guy Helmer
This used to work in 3.3.x: wccp2_service_info 94 protocol=tcp flags=dst_ip_hash,ports_source priority=240 ports=80,81,83,591,8008,8080,443 squid 3.4.12 fails: 2015/03/03 11:02:33.109| cache_cf.cc(556) parseOneConfigFile: Processing: wccp2_service_info 94 protocol=tcp flags=dst_ip_hash,ports_so

Re: [squid-users] wccp2_service_info fails on more than one port number

2015-03-03 Thread Yuri Voinov
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 You cannot combine HTTP and HTTPS in one WCCP service. http://wiki.squid-cache.org/ConfigExamples/Intercept/CiscoIOSv15Wccp2 03.03.15 23:04, Guy Helmer пишет: > This used to work in 3.3.x: > > wccp2_service_info 94 protocol=tcp flags=dst_ip_hash,po

[squid-users] Can single squid server handle 1Gbps traffic?

2015-03-03 Thread siva prakash
Hi, I would like to know whether a single squid server can handle 1Gbps traffic? Consider I have hardware configuration of 64 GB RAM, 12 Core processor and 10 GB NIC. Is it possible? - SP ___ squid-users mailing list

Re: [squid-users] Can single squid server handle 1Gbps traffic?

2015-03-03 Thread Yuri Voinov
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 There is no slow servers. There are slow brains system administrators. IMO - with an excess of. 03.03.15 23:15, siva prakash пишет: > Hi, I would like to know whether a single squid server can handle > 1Gbps traffic? Consider I have hardware configur

Re: [squid-users] wccp2_service_info fails on more than one port number

2015-03-03 Thread Guy Helmer
It has worked in the past with WCCP2 dynamic services at multiple sites. I’ve uncovered the wccp2_service_info ports parsing error: --- src/wccp2.cc.ORIG 2015-03-03 11:08:18.0 -0600 +++ src/wccp2.cc2015-03-03 11:10:37.0 -0600 @@ -2264,7 +2264,10 @@ if (i >= WCCP

Re: [squid-users] wccp2_service_info fails on more than one port number

2015-03-03 Thread Yuri Voinov
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Please, read Cisco iOS WCCPv2 manual first. This one: http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/ios/12_2/configfun/configuration/guide/ffun_c/fcf018.html and this one: http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/ios/12_2/configfun/configuration/guide/ffun_c/fc

Re: [squid-users] Can single squid server handle 1Gbps traffic?

2015-03-03 Thread FredB
> I would like to know whether a single squid server can handle 1Gbps > traffic? > > > Consider I have hardware configuration of 64 GB RAM, 12 Core > processor and 10 GB NIC. Is it possible? > > Depends on what the users are doing, there is a big difference between A) One user is download

Re: [squid-users] wccp2_service_info fails on more than one port number

2015-03-03 Thread Guy Helmer
Thanks Yuri -- I have thoroughly read Cisco IOS configuration manuals pertaining to WCCP2. From what I have read, there is no strict requirement for separate configurations for standard web-cache port 80 and dynamic service for non-port 80 — wccp2 dynamic services allow redirection of any ports

Re: [squid-users] wccp2_service_info fails on more than one port number

2015-03-03 Thread Yuri Voinov
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Don't think this is bug. You got very custom configuration, which can not be common. As I said, HTTP ports other than 80 is very rarely used in WAN's. And be better to separate HTTPS port from HTTP. Modern iOS can not accept your configuration. Bewa

Re: [squid-users] Can single squid server handle 1Gbps traffic?

2015-03-03 Thread Yuri Voinov
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Fred, don't think so. This is big enough box. And files above 1 Gb is not downloaded all time. Main question - what loads planned? Medium office generates this throughtput easily, and this box processed it all without warms up. Medium ISP is anot

Re: [squid-users] wccp2_service_info fails on more than one port number

2015-03-03 Thread Guy Helmer
Disregarding the complaints about Cisco configuration, here is a simple example: If I want to intercept plain HTTP on ports 8008 and 8080: wccp2_service_info 94 protocol=tcp flags=dst_ip_hash,ports_source priority=240 ports=8008,8080 Squid 3.4.12 will still give this incorrect error: FATAL: Bu

Re: [squid-users] wccp2_service_info fails on more than one port number

2015-03-03 Thread Yuri Voinov
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 In this case you can simple open bug on Bugzilla. 04.03.15 0:46, Guy Helmer пишет: > Disregarding the complaints about Cisco configuration, here is a > simple example: If I want to intercept plain HTTP on ports 8008 and > 8080: > > wccp2_service_info

[squid-users] Redirecting traffic to fake parent

2015-03-03 Thread Sebastian Goicochea
Hello everyone, I'm experimenting with cache_peer directive and node.js: cache_peer 10.0.0.90 parent 0 no-query no-digest proxy-only name=test in that port I have a node.js Proxy receiveing connections in the same host, it extracts some information I need and saves it to a DB, then redire

[squid-users] TProxy and client_dst_passthru

2015-03-03 Thread Stakres
Hi All, Does someone know why the "*client_dst_passthru*" does not work in TProxy mode ? From the Squid wiki, we can read that: "/Regardless of this option setting, when dealing with intercepted traffic Squid will verify the Host: header and any traffic which fails Host verification will be treat

Re: [squid-users] TProxy and client_dst_passthru

2015-03-03 Thread Eliezer Croitoru
Hey Fred, It is unclear what doesn't work for you. What would you expect to work and how it works or doesn't work from a user perspective rather then an admin? Is there any trouble from the user side about this issue? Eliezer On 04/03/2015 00:14, Stakres wrote: Hi All, Does someone know why

Re: [squid-users] Redirecting traffic to fake parent

2015-03-03 Thread Amos Jeffries
On 4/03/2015 9:35 a.m., Sebastian Goicochea wrote: > Hello everyone, I'm experimenting with cache_peer directive and node.js: > > cache_peer 10.0.0.90 parent 0 no-query no-digest proxy-only name=test > > in that port I have a node.js Proxy receiveing connections in the same > host, it extrac

Re: [squid-users] Redirecting traffic to fake parent

2015-03-03 Thread johnzeng
Hello Dear Sebastian: i am thinking about node.js + squid at isp environment for video file cache or big file cache recently , Which useful public info will we will obtain from internet ? if y

Re: [squid-users] Can single squid server handle 1Gbps traffic?

2015-03-03 Thread Amos Jeffries
On 4/03/2015 7:20 a.m., Yuri Voinov wrote: > Fred, > > don't think so. > > This is big enough box. > > And files above 1 Gb is not downloaded all time. > > Main question - what loads planned? That was Fred's point. The question as asked was meaningless. Yes a single Squid can reach that speed

Re: [squid-users] TProxy and client_dst_passthru

2015-03-03 Thread Stakres
Hi Eliezer, Well, we have done many tests with Squid (3.1 to 3.5.x), disabling "client_dst_passthru" (off) will stop the DNS entry as explained in the wiki, the option directly acts on the flag "ORIGINAL_DST". As you know, ORIGINAL_DST switches the optimization off (ex: StoreID) then it's not poss