You means replace the 301 because youtube answer to this when connecting
on HTTP
HTTP/1.1 301 Moved Permanently
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2015 11:11:28 GMT
Server: gwiseguy/2.0
Location: https://www.youtube.com/
Do you have tested this because if squid replace the header i think
there will be a loop
Hi all,
I'm new to squid administration, with basic *nix admin skills. My task now
is to replace an old Squid reverse proxy server (3.1.15 on an old Fedora)
with a new one (Squid 3.3.8 on Ubuntu 14 LTS) and ran into a problem.
I've spent 2 days tweaking-googling-debugging, now looking for some he
Hello everybody,
I’d like to distinguish multiple clients that are behind NAT from Squid’s
perspective. Proxy authentication or sessions are not an option for different
reasons and the idea that came up was to assign each client a unique hostname
through which Squid would be addressed (e.g. UUI
On Tue, 2015-02-24 at 15:04 +0100, Peter Oruba wrote:
> Hello everybody,
>
>
> I’d like to distinguish multiple clients that are behind NAT from
> Squid’s perspective. Proxy authentication or sessions are not an
> option for different reasons and the idea that came up was to assign
> each client
Thanks, Brendan, but unfortunately I don’t have access to the NAT configuration.
> Am 24.02.2015 um 15:37 schrieb Brendan Kearney :
>
> On Tue, 2015-02-24 at 15:04 +0100, Peter Oruba wrote:
>> Hello everybody,
>>
>>
>> I’d like to distinguish multiple clients that are behind NAT from
>> Squid’s
> Am 24.02.2015 um 15:39 schrieb Ron Wheeler :
>
> On 24/02/2015 9:04 AM, Peter Oruba wrote:
>> Hello everybody,
>>
>> I’d like to distinguish multiple clients that are behind NAT from Squid’s
>> perspective. Proxy authentication or sessions are not an option for
>> different reasons and the
Hi Greg,
I use this combo to check if request is cached or no and why:
debug_options 20,9 27,9 31,9 70,9 82,9 22,9 84,9 90,9
Then in cache.log file you can search by 'YES' or 'NO' (uppercase) to
see if the content is cacheable (and cached) or not and the reason of
this decision. Hope this will
Hi,
After some digging I realized that this setup works fine for HTTP traffic but
not for HTTPS. I'm using ssl_bump in intercept mode.
Is possible that for HTTPS traffic I can't split the upload / download ?
answers are welcome !!
Thanks
Josep
-Mensaje original-
De: squid-users [mail
Hi all,
so, there's my proxy problem I couldn't crack, even after spending 2+
days tweaking-googling-debugging. :(
The problem: my _new_ Squid installation (Ubuntu 14 LTS with Squid 3.3.8)
won't cache most pages the old Squid does (old Fedora with Squid 3.1.15).
Infos:
- Simple reverse proxy, po
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
24.02.15 21:14, Greg пишет:
> Hi all,
>
> so, there's my proxy problem I couldn't crack, even after spending
> 2+ days tweaking-googling-debugging. :(
>
> The problem: my _new_ Squid installation (Ubuntu 14 LTS with Squid
> 3.3.8) won't cache most p
Amos , you are the rock !!
It worked with 3.5.1
Thank you a lot and appreciate ur help
regards
-Original Message-
From: squid-users [mailto:squid-users-boun...@lists.squid-cache.org] On Behalf
Of Amos Jeffries
Sent: Friday, February 20, 2015 4:16 PM
To: squid-users@lists.squid
> From: Pavel Kazlenka
> To: squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org
> Subject: Re: [squid-users] Need better debug_options values to track
> down cache MISSes
> Message-ID: <54ec9147.6070...@measurement-factory.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; Format="flowed"
>
> Hi Greg,
>
> I
>> Hi all,
>>
>> so, there's my proxy problem I couldn't crack, even after spending
>> 2+ days tweaking-googling-debugging. :(
>>
>> The problem: my _new_ Squid installation (Ubuntu 14 LTS with Squid
>> 3.3.8) won't cache most pages the old Squid does (old Fedora with
>> Squid 3.1.15).
>
> Both ver
Hi David,
I quickly tested something.
with E2Guardian I changed my header:
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:35.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/35.0
By
Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:35.0) Gecko/20100101
Now I can use http://www.google.fr and http://www.youtube.com without
redirection
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Fred,
this is dirty hack and can be not work with HSTS-enabled browsers.
24.02.15 22:34, FredB пишет:
> Hi David,
>
> I quickly tested something. with E2Guardian I changed my header:
>
> Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:35.0) Gecko/20100101
It's just a test
But yes and it didn't works good with youtube ...
Except with google search and FF 35 no problem at all, I'm surfing without any
SSL
Regards,
Fred
http://numsys.eu
http://e2guardian.org
___
squid-users mailing list
squid-us
this is not logic i use same conf in 3.4 and it worked like a charm !! even
the same hardware !!
what is the difference between 3.4 and 3.5 ? or what option in 3.4 if used
in 3.5 will make it crashed ?
i didnt fine and sense !!
--
View this message in context:
http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019
On 2015-02-24 19:25, zanettiza wrote:
Hi Everyone,I've searched and search but have not found an answer to my
question.I'm running CentOS 7 and Squid 3.3.4. When I insert
"http_access
allow Safe_ports" AFTER "http_access allow authenticated_users" I have
no
access to ports listed under my Safe_
By the way, I think Eliezer suggested I should file a bug report. There is in
fact one already filed here:
http://bugs.squid-cache.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3930
Which brings me to my next question ...
Amos, is it possible to sponsor bug fixes?
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 2:47 PM, null wrote:
> Th
On 2015-02-25 03:44, Peter Oruba wrote:
Am 24.02.2015 um 15:39 schrieb Ron Wheeler :
On 24/02/2015 9:04 AM, Peter Oruba wrote:
Hello everybody,
I’d like to distinguish multiple clients that are behind NAT from
Squid’s perspective. Proxy authentication or sessions are not an
option for differ
On 2015-02-25 15:11, d...@getbusi.com wrote:
By the way, I think Eliezer suggested I should file a bug report.
There is in fact one already filed here:
http://bugs.squid-cache.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3930
Which brings me to my next question ...
Amos, is it possible to sponsor bug fixes?
Of cou
On 2015-02-25 05:31, Greg wrote:
Hi all,
so, there's my proxy problem I couldn't crack, even after spending
2+ days tweaking-googling-debugging. :(
The problem: my _new_ Squid installation (Ubuntu 14 LTS with Squid
3.3.8) won't cache most pages the old Squid does (old Fedora with
Squid 3.1.15).
Hi
I am running squid on Centos 6.5
squid-3.1.10-29.el6.x86_64
when I browse to https://www.quadriserv.com from IE or Chrome via the
squid proxy, it seems to corrupt the server cert.
when i browse to the site by passing squid it works fine.
I have tried wget from the squid box works fine also t
I’d be happy to provide a recent backtrace to match the config details but
abrtd always seems to shit the bed:
Feb 25 10:19:14 hostname abrt[10776]: Saved core dump of pid 63925
(/usr/sbin/squid) to /var/spool/abrt/ccpp-2015-02-25-10:19:08-63925 (525869056
bytes)
Feb 25 10:19:14 hostname a
24 matches
Mail list logo
