On Fri, 2015-04-24 at 17:14 +0930, Michael Hendrie wrote:
>
>
> > On 23 Apr 2015, at 9:22 pm, James Lay
> > wrote:
> >
> > Michael,
> >
> > Could you post your entire config here if possible? Many of us
> > continue to face challenges with ssl_bump and a working config would
> > be great. T
> On 23 Apr 2015, at 9:22 pm, James Lay wrote:
>
> Michael,
>
> Could you post your entire config here if possible? Many of us continue to
> face challenges with ssl_bump and a working config would be great. Thank you.
>
> James
My ssl_bump configuration is contained in a separate conf fil
On Thu, 2015-04-23 at 17:18 +0930, Michael Hendrie wrote:
>
>
> > On 23 Apr 2015, at 4:28 pm, Michael Hendrie
> > wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > On 23 Apr 2015, at 4:21 pm, Amos Jeffries
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > On 23/04/2015 6:29 p.m., Michael Hendrie wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi All
> >
> On 23 Apr 2015, at 4:28 pm, Michael Hendrie wrote:
>
>
>> On 23 Apr 2015, at 4:21 pm, Amos Jeffries wrote:
>>
>> On 23/04/2015 6:29 p.m., Michael Hendrie wrote:
>>> Hi All
>>>
>>> I’ve been running squid-3.4.x in tproxy mode with ssl_bump
>>> server-first for some time and has been working
> On 23 Apr 2015, at 4:21 pm, Amos Jeffries wrote:
>
> On 23/04/2015 6:29 p.m., Michael Hendrie wrote:
>> Hi All
>>
>> I’ve been running squid-3.4.x in tproxy mode with ssl_bump
>> server-first for some time and has been working great.
>>
>> I have just moved to 3.5.3 to use peek to overcome s
On 23/04/2015 6:29 p.m., Michael Hendrie wrote:
> Hi All
>
> I’ve been running squid-3.4.x in tproxy mode with ssl_bump
> server-first for some time and has been working great.
>
> I have just moved to 3.5.3 to use peek to overcome some issues with
> sites that require SNI to serve up the correct
