you need to understand
delay_parameters 1 625000/625000 625000/625000
625000/625000 625000/625000( You defined 625000 max and also given 625000
to individual)
see this how you can limit each user bytes of bandwidht
delay_parametes1 62500/62500 25000/25000 # each user has given
an average o
Dear Sekarit
you are using class-1 pool which has a single aggregate bucket to allocate
to all users and every one can use the maximum available FCFS basis.
you need to use class-2 delay pool has an aggregate bucket and 256
individual buckets which distributed among clients t keep them in limit
w
Anyone can help me on this?
On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 6:45 PM, Sekar Duraisamy wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> I have tried to limit the bandwidth for each requests with 5Mbps speed
> with below.
>
> delay_pools 1
> delay_class 1 2
> delay_access 1 allow all
> delay_parameters 1 625000/625000 625000/625000
On 18/09/18 1:15 AM, Sekar Duraisamy wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> I have tried to limit the bandwidth for each requests with 5Mbps speed
> with below.
>
> delay_pools 1
> delay_class 1 2
> delay_access 1 allow all
> delay_parameters 1 625000/625000 625000/625000
>
>
> But it is limiting total bandwi
Thank you very much for support!
Yes, using the config pattern I gave in my first post to this thread.
Just replace the exclusion 'deny' with 'allow'.
"
Use:
delay_access 2 allow !users all
"
This didn't work for me because users have to be authenticated first.
So I configured 2 instances no
On 29/03/18 07:31, vvv25 wrote:
>
>> On 27/03/18 02:51, vvv25 wrote:
>>> Thank you for your time Amos,
>>>
>>> the thing is, I want to have the connection to be restricted by default.
>>> May be I don't understand how to define acl's in the right order.
>>> Or I cannot figure out how to separate
On 27/03/18 02:51, vvv25 wrote:
Thank you for your time Amos,
the thing is, I want to have the connection to be restricted by default.
May be I don't understand how to define acl's in the right order.
Or I cannot figure out how to separate authenticated users from not
authenticated.
You misu
On 27/03/18 02:51, vvv25 wrote:
> Thank you for your time Amos,
>
> the thing is, I want to have the connection to be restricted by default.
> May be I don't understand how to define acl's in the right order.
> Or I cannot figure out how to separate authenticated users from not
> authenticated.
Y
On 27/03/18 02:46, vv...@gmx.net wrote:
> Dear Yuri,
>
> thank you for your quick reply.
> I spend weekend trying and testing some options.
>
> My problem is, i cannot separate authenticated users from not
> authenticated.
>
This is because
a) nobody is allowed to even use the proxy unless the
Probably, yes.
I'm not so good in delay pools, but I guess you moving to right direction.
First require to make clean users separation.
I think, Amos can consult you better. ;-)
26.03.2018 19:46, vv...@gmx.net пишет:
> Dear Yuri,
>
> thank you for your quick reply.
> I spend weekend trying and
Thank you for your time Amos,
the thing is, I want to have the connection to be restricted by default.
May be I don't understand how to define acl's in the right order.
Or I cannot figure out how to separate authenticated users from not
authenticated.
Do you have some suggestions?
Any help w
Dear Yuri,
thank you for your quick reply.
I spend weekend trying and testing some options.
My problem is, i cannot separate authenticated users from not
authenticated.
Here in detail:
if I try to do something like this
cut
acl users proxy_auth "/etc/squid/users"
http_access allow
On 25/03/18 04:15, vvv25 wrote:>
> I want to set up a slow delay pool by default. (for unauthenticated users)
> For registered users I want to assign another delay pool with no
> restriction (full speed).
The thing with DelayPool is that to "set" no restriction you *dont*
assign a delay pool.
Wha
https://wiki.squid-cache.org/Features/DelayPools
24.03.2018 21:15, vv...@gmx.net пишет:
> Dear Comunity,
>
> I have the following question:
> Is it possible with squid to select delay pool depending on whether
> the user is authenticated or not?
>
> Background:
> I want to set up a slow delay poo
On 23/09/17 04:30, Alex Gutiérrez Martínez wrote:
Pool #3 requires the domain name of a single transaction to
simultaneously be *mail.yahoo.com AND *.linkedin.com AND *.youtube.com
Obviously that is impossible, so nothing can match the line that allows.
Pool #1 should match a few things. But
On 23/09/17 03:48, Heiler Bemerguy wrote:
Amos, talking about delay pools, I have a question: does it work if the
content being served is on a cache peer?
It should, yes. Peers are no different than any other server in terms of
I/O bytes.
The only thing I'm aware of in current Squid is may
Pool #3 requires the domain name of a single transaction to
simultaneously be *mail.yahoo.com AND *.linkedin.com AND *.youtube.com
Obviously that is impossible, so nothing can match the line that allows.
Pool #1 should match a few things. But probably not what you are testing
with.
I suggest y
Amos, talking about delay pools, I have a question: does it work if the
content being served is on a cache peer?
I think it only "shapes" traffic from a SERVER to squid, right? not from
a peer cache to squid.. :/
I'm having problems because we use a huge Microsoft Updates repository
as a cac
On 23/09/17 02:31, Alex Gutiérrez Martínez wrote:
Could someone be so kind to explain to me why my rules do not work on
my delays pools?
...
Thanks again Mr. Jeffries, i change my delay to:
acl navegación src 192.168.9.0/24
acl lento dstdomain "/etc/squid3/bloqueo/lento" --> .youtube.com
Could someone be so kind to explain to me why my rules do not work on
my delays pools?
i got this acl "lento", in spanish means slow
acl lento url_regex -i "/etc/squid3/bloqueo/lento"
his format is the next:
.youtube.com
.facebook.com
First problem: you are putting domains in dstdomain fo
On 22/09/17 09:07, Alex Gutiérrez Martínez wrote:
Could someone be so kind to explain to me why my rules do not work on
my delays pools?
i got this acl "lento", in spanish means slow
acl lento url_regex -i "/etc/squid3/bloqueo/lento"
his format is the next:
.youtube.com
.facebook.com
On 2/05/2016 9:52 p.m., Magic Link wrote:
> Hi,
>
> i want to use delay pool with class 2. I don't understand how
> requests are handled on each bucket. There are 2 type of buckets in
> class 2, one aggregate and 256 individuals buckets. When aggregate
> bucket is used ? Is there a priority betwee
This seems to be fixed in 3.5.10. Tough I still see a few large-ish
negative numbers (-7373 for example) they seem to stop growing indefinitely.
Chico Venancio
CEO e Diretor de Criação
VM TECH - (98) 9 8800 2743
2015-10-25 23:17 GMT-03:00 Amos Jeffries :
> On 26/10/2015 5:23 a.m., Chico Venanci
On 26/10/2015 5:23 a.m., Chico Venancio wrote:
> Is everyone still having this issue?
> We tried messing arround with the .conf and used a 32bit debian as well to
> no avail.
>
No. Just those of you having it.
I am suspecting that the problem is related to CONNECT tunnels. Since
HTTPS traffic is
Is everyone still having this issue?
We tried messing arround with the .conf and used a 32bit debian as well to
no avail.
Chico Venancio
> 2015-10-14 0:03 GMT-03:00 Amos Jeffries :
>>
>> On 14/10/2015 11:46 a.m., Chico Venancio wrote:
>> > I have configured delay pools for a client that delays ac
On 14/10/2015 11:46 a.m., Chico Venancio wrote:
> I have configured delay pools for a client that delays access to a few
> sites, including youtube and facebook.
> It seems to work for some clients, and has significantly reduced link
> congestion. However, some clients seem to be unaffected by the
On 15/04/2015 11:33 a.m., Hector Chan wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> If I configure a new delay pool in the config file or reconfigure an
> existing delay pool, do I have to restart squid? Can I send a SIGHUP to it
> to re-read the config file instead ? If I send a SIGHUP, what would happen
> to downloads
On 20/02/2015 11:20 a.m., Hector Chan wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Is there anyway I can apply the delay pool to only cache miss ? I wanted
> to let the client download as fast as possible if the request resulted in a
> cache hit, but not on cache miss.
That is the default behaviour for delay pools.
Th
28 matches
Mail list logo
