IPv4 only ips, I have a BE with tunnel broker that I test out but my IPS IDS
can’t inspect the tunnel
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jul 14, 2024, at 22:49, Andrea Venturoli wrote:
>
> On 7/13/24 20:48, Jonathan Lee wrote:
>> It works 6.6 it just have a different requirement to enable it. I am usin
On 7/13/24 20:48, Jonathan Lee wrote:
It works 6.6 it just have a different requirement to enable it. I am using a
Netgate 2100 with pfSense. The difference is that it spoofs the IP of the
client so the host doesn’t see the IP of the firewall when using intercept I am
told. So transparent with
Best way to describe it is transparent intercept maybe… tproxy takes place of
intercept on the http_port directive
Sent from my iPhone
> On Jul 13, 2024, at 11:49, Jonathan Lee wrote:
>
> It works 6.6 it just have a different requirement to enable it. I am using a
> Netgate 2100 with pfSense
It works 6.6 it just have a different requirement to enable it. I am using a
Netgate 2100 with pfSense. The difference is that it spoofs the IP of the
client so the host doesn’t see the IP of the firewall when using intercept I am
told. So transparent with more of a hidden layer
Sent from my iP
On 7/13/24 17:04, Jonathan David Lee FreeBSD Alpine wrote:
Do you consider pfsense freebsd or openbsd based
I know nothing about pfsense.
becaause it does work,
Good to know.
What kind of firewall do you use? ipfw? pf? other?
it does not in squid 6.6 requires a different ./ command in squi
Do you consider pfsense freebsd or openbsd based, becaause it does work,
it does not in squid 6.6 requires a different ./ command in squid 5.8 you
can just enable it
On Sat, 13 Jul 2024, Andrea Venturoli wrote:
On 7/13/24 00:28, Jonathan Lee wrote:
For the HTTP and https derivative is it bet
On 7/13/24 00:28, Jonathan Lee wrote:
For the HTTP and https derivative is it better to use tproxy or intercept on
FreeBSD?
AFAIK TProxy does not work on FreeBSD, but I'd be glad to be proven wrong.
bye
av.
___
squid-users mailing list
squ
