On 1/8/21 12:18 PM, p...@pjb.org.uk wrote:
> I am using Ssl-bump, but on a different inbound port and it will never be for
> traffic heading
> out to this peer.
My assumption is correct then -- bugs notwithstanding, we can ignore
SslBump limitations here because they do not apply to your use ca
Thank you for responding.
> N.B. I assume you do not use SslBump -- the configuration snippet above
> does not show SslBump being used. SslBump does not support what you want
> per commit f5e1794 message.
I am using Ssl-bump, but on a different inbound port and it will never be for
traffic headi
On 1/7/21 2:43 PM, p...@pjb.org.uk wrote:
> I am currently using Squid 5.0.3 but have an issue when using a cache_peer
> (non-squid &
> outside my control) that requires authentication. My Squid server doesn't
> require
> authentication and reading the documentation indicated that I need to