Re: [squid-users] Spdy header and related

2016-08-03 Thread joe
tks amos yes its just to have some gain of caching -- View this message in context: http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/Spdy-header-and-related-tp4678728p4678731.html Sent from the Squid - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___

Re: [squid-users] Spdy header and related

2016-08-03 Thread Amos Jeffries
On 4/08/2016 12:34 a.m., joe wrote: > is it ok to drop X-Firefox-Spdy > reply_header_access X-Firefox-Spdy deny all > just alow http/1 "just allow http/1" is not what the above does. It simply denies the client being informed about that header existing. > and if yes how chrome use Spdy in header