-users@lists.squid-cache.org
> Subject: Re: [squid-users] Proxy server to support a large number of
> simultaneous requests
>
> Hello, Alex,
>
> I have shortened the correspondence because it does not meet the size
> requirements for the mailing list.
>
> Thank you so
Subject: Re: [squid-users] Proxy server to support a large number of
simultaneous requests
Hello, Alex,
I have shortened the correspondence because it does not meet the size
requirements for the mailing list.
Thank you so much for your time, the analysis and recommendations.
I disabled the
Hello, Alex,
I have shortened the correspondence because it does not meet the size
requirements for the mailing list.
Thank you so much for your time, the analysis and recommendations.
I disabled the cache_dir and now squid works as expected - there is only
one request to the original content s
On 6/2/23 03:29, Andrey K wrote:
> Can you repeat this test and share a pointer to the corresponding
> compressed cache.log, containing those 500 (or fewer, as long as the
> problem is reproduced!) concurrent transactions. One or many of those
> concurrent transactions resulted in the unwant
Hello, Alex,
Thank you very much.
> Can you repeat this test and share a pointer to the corresponding
> compressed cache.log, containing those 500 (or fewer, as long as the
> problem is reproduced!) concurrent transactions. One or many of those
> concurrent transactions resulted in the unwanted e
On 6/1/23 05:20, Andrey K wrote:
> The next step I would recommend is to study the very first cache miss
> _after_ the 500 or 200 concurrent threads test. Doing so may shed light
> on why Squid is refusing to serve that (presumably cached) object from
> the cache. I suspect that the object w
Hello, Alex,
Thanks for the help.
> The next step I would recommend is to study the very first cache miss
> _after_ the 500 or 200 concurrent threads test. Doing so may shed light
> on why Squid is refusing to serve that (presumably cached) object from
> the cache. I suspect that the object was m
On 5/31/23 02:56, Andrey K wrote:
> Do you get close to 100% hit ratio if clients access these URLs
> sequentially rather than concurrently? If not, then focus on that
> problem before you open the collapsed forwarding Pandora box.
When I run curl sequentially like this:
for i in `seq 500`; d
Hello, Alex,
Thank you for the recommendations.
> Do you get close to 100% hit ratio if clients access these URLs
> sequentially rather than concurrently? If not, then focus on that
> problem before you open the collapsed forwarding Pandora box.
When I run curl sequentially like this:
for i in `s
On 5/29/23 10:43, Andrey K wrote:
We need to configure a dedicated proxy server to provide caching of
online video broadcasts in order to reduce the load on the uplink proxy.
Hundreds of users will access the same video-chunks simultaneously.
I developed a simple configuration for the test pur
10 matches
Mail list logo
