Re: [squid-users] ICAP question

2016-10-10 Thread Alex Rousskov
On 10/10/2016 03:28 AM, Eliezer Croitoru wrote: > I am not sure but it seems to me like I might not understood squid ACLS > right but yet to be 100% about it. > acl PERMIT_REQUESTS type REQMOD RESPMOD > icap_access allow localhost PERMIT_REQUESTS > icap_access deny all > > The acl as far as I know

Re: [squid-users] ICAP question

2016-10-10 Thread James Lay
On Mon, 2016-10-10 at 12:28 +0300, Eliezer Croitoru wrote: > I am not sure but it seems to me like I might not understood squid > ACLS > right but yet to be 100% about it. > acl PERMIT_REQUESTS type REQMOD RESPMOD > icap_access allow localhost PERMIT_REQUESTS > icap_access deny all > The acl as far

Re: [squid-users] ICAP question

2016-10-10 Thread Eliezer Croitoru
I am not sure but it seems to me like I might not understood squid ACLS right but yet to be 100% about it. acl PERMIT_REQUESTS type REQMOD RESPMOD icap_access allow localhost PERMIT_REQUESTS icap_access deny all The acl as far as I know doesn’t have any type such as ICAP request mode. Am I right?

Re: [squid-users] ICAP question

2016-10-09 Thread James Lay
On Sun, 2016-10-09 at 12:43 -0600, Alex Rousskov wrote: > On 10/09/2016 11:02 AM, James Lay wrote: > > > > > WARNING: Squid is configured to use ICAP method REQMOD for service > > icap://localhost:1344/srv_cfg_filter but OPTIONS response declares > > the > > methods are RESPMOD > If your srv_cont

Re: [squid-users] ICAP question

2016-10-09 Thread Alex Rousskov
On 10/09/2016 11:02 AM, James Lay wrote: > WARNING: Squid is configured to use ICAP method REQMOD for service > icap://localhost:1344/srv_cfg_filter but OPTIONS response declares the > methods are RESPMOD If your srv_content_filtering.so service does not need to see HTTP requests, then you can re

Re: [squid-users] ICAP question

2016-10-09 Thread Benjamin E. Nichols
Dearest Mr. James Lay. After considering your previous slanderous, and inflammatory trolling of my earlier correspondence, my initial response is to help alleviate your issue but rather, I think not, I believe considering the nature of your personal disposition to be a slanderous communist pie