On 27/09/17 12:55, Aaron Turner wrote:
So reading the bug comments it doesn't sound like there's any config
changes I can make (other then not use rock, which in smp doesn't
sound like a good idea). I might be able to run ALL,9 and collect
the output... would need to sanitize the URL's due to
So reading the bug comments it doesn't sound like there's any config
changes I can make (other then not use rock, which in smp doesn't
sound like a good idea). I might be able to run ALL,9 and collect
the output... would need to sanitize the URL's due to privacy/security
concerns. Anything else
On 27/09/17 10:30, Aaron Turner wrote:
Doing some basic system tests and we're seeing a bunch of errors like:
2017/09/22 22:43:15 kid1| Bug: Missing MemObject::storeId value
2017/09/22 22:43:15 kid1| mem_hdr: 0x7f169d0a2a70 nodes.start() 0x7f169c6cc9d0
2017/09/22 22:43:15 kid1| mem_hdr: 0x7f169d
;> recommendation and I believe that some articles and resources that can be
>> fetched from the Internet can miss-lead a Linux system administrator
>> expectation from squid-cache or any cache.
>>
>> Please test Squid-Cache one step at a time and do not get tempted to try to
t Squid-Cache one step at a time and do not get tempted to try to
> "cache all" since it's practically not possible.
> Update us as you move forward with your tests.
>
> Eliezer
>
>
> Eliezer Croitoru
> Linux System Administrator
> Mobile: +972-5-28704261
22:57
To: Eliezer Croitoru
Cc: squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org
Subject: Re: [squid-users] Bug: Missing MemObject::storeId value
So is v4 stable? I was the impression it was beta? That said, if v4
has better memory tuning options then I'm all ears. Right now I'm
fighting OOM erro
On 09/25/2017 08:19 PM, Amos Jeffries wrote:
> On 26/09/17 08:56, Aaron Turner wrote:
>> I can disable rock cache, but I need some disk cache- is there a
>> better option?
> Possibly a smaller rock cache, and a UFS/AUFS/diskd cache - rock can
> share disk with another cache, its just the UFS/* cac
On 26/09/17 08:56, Aaron Turner wrote:
So is v4 stable? I was the impression it was beta? That said, if v4
has better memory tuning options then I'm all ears.
Yes it is beta. Some bugs still to work out in the ssl-bump code, but
that is all.
Overall the v4 ssl-bump code is far better behav
So is v4 stable? I was the impression it was beta? That said, if v4
has better memory tuning options then I'm all ears. Right now I'm
fighting OOM errors (and the kernel OOM reaper) under sustained load.
I've come to realize 6GB is way way too much for my 14GB RAM systems,
but finding even 1GB i
Hey Aaron,
Just to clear out the doubt's, what happen when you use squid-cache without
rock cache_dir? Is the problem appearing again?
Also, there is a possibility of a bug which is related to squid ssl-bump
termination code on 3.5.X.
Testing 4.0.21 would be the best to understand if the issue i
I have this since forever.. 3.5.27 with one cache_peer and 4 rockstores
2017/09/21 11:19:45 kid1| Bug: Missing MemObject::storeId value
2017/09/21 11:19:45 kid1| mem_hdr: 0x1902d240 nodes.start() 0x552baa0
2017/09/21 11:19:45 kid1| mem_hdr: 0x1902d240 nodes.finish() 0x552baa0
2017/09/21 11:19:45
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
HTCP has the same function like ICP. So, this is predictable.
04.06.2016 3:20, Heiler Bemerguy пишет:
>
> Thanks Amos,
>
> I switched to HTCP but the same problem happens..
>
> 2016/06/03 18:14:00 kid3| Bug: Missing MemObject::storeId value
> 201
Thanks Amos,
I switched to HTCP but the same problem happens..
2016/06/03 18:14:00 kid3| Bug: Missing MemObject::storeId value
2016/06/03 18:14:00 kid3| mem_hdr: 0x72d3610 nodes.start() 0x5fc30d0
2016/06/03 18:14:00 kid3| mem_hdr: 0x72d3610 nodes.finish() 0x5fc30d0
2016/06/03 18:14:00 kid3| Mem
On 1/06/2016 4:36 a.m., Heiler Bemerguy wrote:
>
> This is the parent proxy of another one (10.1.10.101).
>
> It was receiveing requests like these:
>
> 1464665138.326 0 10.1.10.101 UDP_MISS/000 72 ICP_QUERY
> http://img.olx.com.br/thumbs/51/51763636766.jpg - HIER_NONE/- -
> 1464665138.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Aha,
for cached objects no matter HTTP or ICP query requested they.
31.05.2016 22:36, Heiler Bemerguy пишет:
>
>
> This is the parent proxy of another one (10.1.10.101).
>
> It was receiveing requests like these:
>
> 1464665138.326 0 10.1.10
This is the parent proxy of another one (10.1.10.101).
It was receiveing requests like these:
1464665138.326 0 10.1.10.101 UDP_MISS/000 72 ICP_QUERY
http://img.olx.com.br/thumbs/51/51763636766.jpg - HIER_NONE/- -
1464665138.331 0 10.1.10.101 UDP_MISS/000 72 ICP_QUERY
http://img.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
This proxy uses as peer for downstreams?
31.05.2016 21:09, Heiler Bemerguy пишет:
>
>
> I disabled ICP requests to it and these "Bug: Missing
MemObject::storeId value" messages stopped... any thoughts?
>
> Known bug?
>
> --
> Best Regards,
>
> He
I disabled ICP requests to it and these "Bug: Missing MemObject::storeId
value" messages stopped... any thoughts?
Known bug?
--
Best Regards,
Heiler Bemerguy
Network Manager - CINBESA
55 91 98151-4894/3184-1751
Em 31/05/2016 11:49, Yuri escreveu:
Hm. Seems related. The objects not the s
Hm. Seems related. The objects not the same in memory yet.
31.05.2016 20:45, Heiler Bemerguy пишет:
Yep I know it should/would vanish all those "Vary objects" messages..
but what are these other "Bug: Missing MemObject::storeId value" ?? I
thought it was related...
2016/05/31 11:43:27.594
19 matches
Mail list logo
