On 19/09/17 23:54, Iraj Norouzi wrote:
hi Antony
thanks for you reply
i setup squid on ubuntu and centos
Why both?
because of test and because i not get the result
with tproxy and wccp for 6 gb/s traffic
What hardware are you using for that sort of traffic flow?
i use hp DL360 with 2 6 cor
hi Antony
thanks for you reply
> i setup squid on ubuntu and centos
Why both?
because of test and because i not get the result
> with tproxy and wccp for 6 gb/s traffic
What hardware are you using for that sort of traffic flow?
i use hp DL360 with 2 6 core processor with 3 GHZ and 64 GB RAM and
On Tuesday 19 September 2017 at 11:34:37, Antony Stone wrote:
> Is the direct traffic still being routed through the Squid server (you say
> you're using tproxy, so I assume this is an intercept machine with the
> traffic going through it between client and server)?
Apologies - with WCCP this is
On Tuesday 19 September 2017 at 11:18:34, Iraj Norouzi wrote:
> hi everybody
> i setup squid on ubuntu and centos
Why both?
> with tproxy and wccp for 6 gb/s traffic
What hardware are you using for that sort of traffic flow?
> but when i try to test squid with 40 mb/s traffic
How are you gene
hi everybody
i setup squid on ubuntu and centos with tproxy and wccp for 6 gb/s traffic
but when i try to test squid with 40 mb/s traffic it response very slow
while when i use direct browsing i can browse websites very fast, i used
tcpdump for tracing connections arrive time and there was no probl
