Re: [squid-users] ssl_bump with parent cache

2022-03-09 Thread Alex Rousskov
On 3/9/22 16:16, Aaron Dewell wrote: the difference in what works and what doesn't is: ssl_bump peek step1 ssl_bump splice all (working) and this not working: ssl_bump peek all ssl_bump splice all ... which, for comparison purposes, is equivalent to: ssl_bump peek step1 ssl_bump peek s

Re: [squid-users] ssl_bump with parent cache

2022-03-09 Thread Aaron Dewell
So after a bit more experimentation. the difference in what works and what doesn't is: ssl_bump peek step1 ssl_bump splice all (working) and this not working: ssl_bump peek all ssl_bump splice all I'm not clear on why peeking at "all" vs. "step1" would cause it to fail. However, I also note th

Re: [squid-users] ssl_bump with parent cache

2022-03-08 Thread Alex Rousskov
On 3/8/22 17:56, Aaron Dewell wrote: Ok, with a bit more messing with it...  Changing bump to splice does work: ssl_bump splice all Noted. Adding: acl step2 at_step SslBump2 ssl_bump peek step1 ssl_bump peek step2 ssl_bump splice step2 The above is a bad configuration because no rule m

Re: [squid-users] ssl_bump with parent cache

2022-03-08 Thread Aaron Dewell
Ok, with a bit more messing with it... Changing bump to splice does work: ssl_bump splice all Adding: acl step2 at_step SslBump2 ssl_bump peek step1 ssl_bump peek step2 ssl_bump splice step2 Fails (back to the connection errors as with bump). My guess is that this means it can splice at step1 bu

Re: [squid-users] ssl_bump with parent cache

2022-03-08 Thread Alex Rousskov
On 3/8/22 16:38, Aaron Dewell wrote: Hi Alex, thanks for your reply!  I did get access to the parent proxy and my assumption was wrong, it's doing minimal bumping. TLS inspection at the parent proxy does not affect what I was trying to double check. What matters is whether it is a forward HTT

Re: [squid-users] ssl_bump with parent cache

2022-03-08 Thread Aaron Dewell
Hi Alex, thanks for your reply! I did get access to the parent proxy and my assumption was wrong, it's doing minimal bumping. Also, the reason it's on 443 is to operate on a "standard" port for firewalls. The parent is doing peek and splice to an exact list of internal destinations. Specificall

Re: [squid-users] ssl_bump with parent cache

2022-03-08 Thread Alex Rousskov
On 3/8/22 14:16, Aaron Dewell wrote: I'm trying to use these two features at the same time.  The use case is pretty simple.  I want to capture all traffic from a single source (a device of mine) to another squid proxy server and decrypt/log it.    I'm using the Ubuntu 20 package of squid-ssl v

[squid-users] ssl_bump with parent cache

2022-03-08 Thread Aaron Dewell
Hi all, I'm trying to use these two features at the same time. The use case is pretty simple. I want to capture all traffic from a single source (a device of mine) to another squid proxy server and decrypt/log it. I'm using the Ubuntu 20 package of squid-ssl version 4.13. Device -> ssl_bump pro