Re: [squid-users] ssl + stunnel and cache peer

2016-03-30 Thread Amos Jeffries
On 30/03/2016 9:43 a.m., Baselsayeh wrote: > sorry > it seems that http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com doesnt > remove posts This is an email mailing list. Nabble is just an archive display. There is no "oops I should not have mailed the world" undo feature in email. > > Yuri Voin

Re: [squid-users] ssl + stunnel and cache peer

2016-03-29 Thread Baselsayeh
sorry it seems that http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com doesnt remove posts Yuri Voinov wrote > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > I said exactly: "Cache peer cannot use re-crypting right now". > > No matter what do you have behind cache_peer. > > 30.03.16 2:4

Re: [squid-users] ssl + stunnel and cache peer

2016-03-29 Thread Yuri Voinov
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 I said exactly: "Cache peer cannot use re-crypting right now". No matter what do you have behind cache_peer. 30.03.16 2:40, Baselsayeh пишет: > is there a workaround that i can use cache peer and squid sslbump? > isnt stunnel is using ssl that sq

Re: [squid-users] ssl + stunnel and cache peer

2016-03-29 Thread Baselsayeh
sorry it seems that http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com doesnt remove posts -- View this message in context: http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/ssl-stunnel-and-cache-peer-tp4676844p4676852.html Sent from the Squid - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. __

Re: [squid-users] ssl + stunnel and cache peer

2016-03-29 Thread Baselsayeh
is there a workaround that i can use cache peer and squid sslbump? isnt stunnel is using ssl that squid dont need to re-crypting? Yuri Voinov wrote > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > He means something like privoxy. > > It possible tunnel https. > > The similar config ofte

Re: [squid-users] ssl + stunnel and cache peer

2016-03-29 Thread Yuri Voinov
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 There is no workaround. 30.03.16 2:38, Baselsayeh пишет: > is there a workaround that i can use ssl bump with cache peer? > > > Yuri Voinov wrote > He means something like privoxy. > > It possible tunnel https. > > The similar config often uses fo

Re: [squid-users] ssl + stunnel and cache peer

2016-03-29 Thread Baselsayeh
is there a workaround that i can use ssl bump with cache peer? Yuri Voinov wrote > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > He means something like privoxy. > > It possible tunnel https. > > The similar config often uses for tunnel some proxied connections to Tor > or another ISP

Re: [squid-users] ssl + stunnel and cache peer

2016-03-29 Thread Yuri Voinov
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 He means something like privoxy. It possible tunnel https. The similar config often uses for tunnel some proxied connections to Tor or another ISP or something. But the thing he required is not possible. Cache peers does not support re-crypting

Re: [squid-users] ssl + stunnel and cache peer

2016-03-29 Thread Antony Stone
On Tuesday 29 Mar 2016 at 20:11, Baselsayeh wrote: > my setup is > my pc with squid(as stunnel client) -> stunnel and proxy(normal non > https) > ive got these errors: > 2-i cant surf any https site What do you mean by the remote proxy being "normal non https"? Is that perhaps the reason yo

Re: [squid-users] ssl + stunnel and cache peer

2016-03-29 Thread Baselsayeh
And note that i need ssl bumping not splicing Baselsayeh wrote > hello > im trying to get squid + stunnel working > my setup is > > my pc with squid(as stunnel client) -> stunnel and proxy(normal non > https) > squid should be bumping the connection > > my config: > > https_port 3429 inter

[squid-users] ssl + stunnel and cache peer

2016-03-29 Thread Baselsayeh
hello im trying to get squid + stunnel working my setup is my pc with squid(as stunnel client) -> stunnel and proxy(normal non https) squid should be bumping the connection my config: https_port 3429 intercept ssl-bump generate-host-certificates=on dynamic_cert_mem_cache_size=200MB cert=/tmp