On 12/1/21 9:06 PM, Amos Jeffries wrote:
> The "file" in the helper name means one file per object, which is quite
> crude type of storage but very easy to implement as a proof of concept
> helper.
>
> As Alex mentioned there are a lot of optimizations that can still be
> made (and bugs to fix) w
On 2/12/21 07:55, Jason Spashett wrote:
On Wed, 1 Dec 2021 at 18:29, Alex Rousskov
wrote:
On 12/1/21 12:06 PM, David Touzeau wrote:
Hi
We used Squid 5.2 and we see that security_file_certgen consume I/O
Is there any way to put the ssldb in memory without need to mount a tmpfs ?
Yes, there
On 12/1/21 1:55 PM, Jason Spashett wrote:
> We have found that the certificate helpers perform strictly worse with
> the disk cache turned on, over approximately 3 processes. It is
> something that perhaps one day, with luck, we may be able to
> contribute something. The problems are the way in wh
On Wed, 1 Dec 2021 at 18:29, Alex Rousskov
wrote:
>
> On 12/1/21 12:06 PM, David Touzeau wrote:
> >
> > Hi
> >
> > We used Squid 5.2 and we see that security_file_certgen consume I/O
> > Is there any way to put the ssldb in memory without need to mount a tmpfs ?
>
> Yes, there are at least two oth
On 12/1/21 12:06 PM, David Touzeau wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> We used Squid 5.2 and we see that security_file_certgen consume I/O
> Is there any way to put the ssldb in memory without need to mount a tmpfs ?
Yes, there are at least two other ways to reduce disk I/O related to
certificate generation:
1)
Hi
We used Squid 5.2 and we see that security_file_certgen consume I/O
Is there any way to put the ssldb in memory without need to mount a tmpfs ?
regards
___
squid-users mailing list
squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org
http://lists.squid-cache.org/list
