rock ]
squid version [ Version 4.8]
thank u
From: Alex Rousskov
Sent: Tuesday, July 7, 2020 4:32 PM
To: patrick mkhael ;
squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org
Subject: Re: [squid-users] rock issue
On 7/7/20 6:26 AM, patrick mkhael wrote:
> **What kind of
ent:* Saturday, July 4, 2020 3:40 AM
> *To:* patrick mkhael ;
> squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org
> *Subject:* Re: [squid-users] rock issue
>
> On 7/3/20 4:50 AM, patrick mkhael wrote:
>
>> workers 3
>> cpu_affinity_map process_numbers=1,2,3,4,5,6 cores=1,2,3,4,5,6
.
thank u
From: Alex Rousskov
Sent: Saturday, July 4, 2020 3:40 AM
To: patrick mkhael ;
squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org
Subject: Re: [squid-users] rock issue
On 7/3/20 4:50 AM, patrick mkhael wrote:
> workers 3
> cpu_affinity_map process_numbers=1,2,3
ursday, July 2, 2020 4:24 PM
> *To:* patrick mkhael ;
> squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org
> *Subject:* Re: [squid-users] rock issue
>
> On 7/1/20 4:45 PM, patrick mkhael wrote:
>
>> ***Please note that you have 20 kids worth mapping (10 workers and 10
>> diske
By my observation while you set workers squid spawns multiples processes
something like this (example workers = 2, 3 rock cache_dir diskers):
squid parent -> worker 1, worker 2, disker 1, disker 2, disker 3, squid
smp coordinator
Process names like squid-1 or squid-disk-3 (note process number
e a way to use aufs ?
thank u
From: Alex Rousskov
Sent: Thursday, July 2, 2020 4:24 PM
To: patrick mkhael ;
squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org
Subject: Re: [squid-users] rock issue
On 7/1/20 4:45 PM, patrick mkhael wrote:
> ***Please note that you have
On 7/1/20 4:45 PM, patrick mkhael wrote:
> ***Please note that you have 20 kids worth mapping (10 workers and 10
> diskers), but you map only the first 10.{since i did not get the point
> of the diskers ,as far as i understood , it should be like (simple
> example)
>> workers 2
>> cpu_affinity
squid-cache.org
Subject: Re: [squid-users] rock issue
On 2/07/20 8:45 am, patrick mkhael wrote:
>
> ***Please note that you have 20 kids worth mapping (10 workers and 10
> diskers), but you map only the first 10.{since i did not get the point
> of the diskers ,as far as i understood ,
On 2/07/20 8:45 am, patrick mkhael wrote:
>
> ***Please note that you have 20 kids worth mapping (10 workers and 10
> diskers), but you map only the first 10.{since i did not get the point
> of the diskers ,as far as i understood , it should be like (simple
> example)
> >workers 2
>> cpu_affin
To: patrick mkhael ;
squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org
Subject: Re: [squid-users] rock issue
On 7/1/20 1:45 PM, patrick mkhael wrote:
> Kindly note that i have a lab, where the internet traffic is 100 Mb/s
> of pure http targeted traffic, i m trying to achieve cache gain ratio of
> 60% ,
On 7/1/20 1:45 PM, patrick mkhael wrote:
> Kindly note that i have a lab, where the internet traffic is 100 Mb/s
> of pure http targeted traffic, i m trying to achieve cache gain ratio of
> 60% , i was able to do this using ufs cache dir and single worker.
> But i found that i need to work with
Dears,
Kindly note that i have a lab, where the internet traffic is 100 Mb/s of pure
http targeted traffic, i m trying to achieve cache gain ratio of 60% , i was
able to do this using ufs cache dir and single worker.
But i found that i need to work with rock cache dir since the real traffic is
12 matches
Mail list logo