Re: [squid-users] range_offset_limit not working as expected

2017-07-16 Thread Amos Jeffries
On 16/07/17 21:45, Omid Kosari wrote: Amos Jeffries wrote Squid DNS system can be updated to do things better. Hi, Any news or updates ? Alex has been doing some of the necessary DNS redesign to get "Happy Eyeballs" behaviour going better. So we are a few steps closer now in Squid-5, b

Re: [squid-users] range_offset_limit not working as expected

2017-07-16 Thread Omid Kosari
Amos Jeffries wrote > Squid DNS system can be updated to do things better. Hi, Any news or updates ? -- View this message in context: http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/range-offset-limit-not-working-as-expected-tp4679355p4683112.html Sent from the Squid - Users mailing list

Re: [squid-users] range_offset_limit not working as expected

2016-09-06 Thread Amos Jeffries
On 6/09/2016 9:14 p.m., Omid Kosari wrote: > It is tproxy cache . Is there a way to force caching them . No, and trying to do so is a VERY bad idea. I cannot stress enough how bad it is. Allowing remote attackers to completely (and invisibly) bypass almost all other security measures you might ha

Re: [squid-users] range_offset_limit not working as expected

2016-09-06 Thread Omid Kosari
It is tproxy cache . Is there a way to force caching them . current configs: host_verify_strict off client_dst_passthru on dns_nameservers x.y.160.172 dns_nameservers 217.218.155.155 dns_nameservers 217.218.127.127 dns_nameservers 8.8.8.8 dns_nameservers 8.8.4.4 dns_nameservers 208.67.222.222 dns_

Re: [squid-users] range_offset_limit not working as expected

2016-09-05 Thread sallo baloch
plz send me a squid.config file from https and http cahe On Mon, Sep 5, 2016 at 7:09 PM, Amos Jeffries wrote: > What are you expecting? > > The Squid native format access.log shows what was delivered to the > client, and what server was involved. It does not show how the > range_offset_limit dir

Re: [squid-users] range_offset_limit not working as expected

2016-09-05 Thread Amos Jeffries
What are you expecting? The Squid native format access.log shows what was delivered to the client, and what server was involved. It does not show how the range_offset_limit directive affected the server connection messages. The ORIGINAL_DST indicates that this is intercepted traffic. Notice how

[squid-users] range_offset_limit not working as expected

2016-09-05 Thread Omid Kosari
Hello, My config: acl download_until_end dstdomain .cdn.mozilla.net range_offset_limit none download_until_end Squid 3.5.19 1473082997.229697 x.29.186.47 TCP_MISS/206 300476 GET http://download.cdn.mozilla.net/pub/firefox/releases/48.0.2/update/win32/en-US/firefox-48.0.2.complete.mar - O