that another video same site same refresh that cached
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Cache-Control: public
On 17/03/2016 12:07 a.m., joe wrote:
> that another video same site same refresh that cached
>
> HTTP/1.1 200 OK
> Cache-Control: public public the other have double public, public
> Content-Length: 18902993
> Content-Type: video/x-flv
> Expir
On 16/03/2016 11:52 p.m., joe wrote:
> is this cachable
>
The headers say it _might_ be.
Response headers are not the whole story though. Request headers matter.
As do *all* of your refresh_pattern lines.
>
> HTTP/1.1 200 OK
> Accept-Ranges: bytes
> Content-Type: video/x-flv
> Server: nginx
is this cachable
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Accept-Ranges: bytes
Content-Type: video/x-flv
Server: nginx
Cache-Control: public, public
Age: 5707758
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2016 11:15:20 GMT
Last-Modified: Thu, 21 May 2015 14:56:19 GMT
Expires: Mon, 09 May 2016 09:46:02 GMT
Content-Length: 22371738
X-Cache: MISS
my understood to L-M factor algorithm was wrong tks again it work
--
View this message in context:
http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/not-caching-tp4676710p4676719.html
Sent from the Squid - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_
