Re: [squid-users] http_port intercept: squid 3.1.20 VS 3.5.23.

2017-10-04 Thread Thomas Martin
2017-10-04 13:41 GMT+02:00 Antony Stone : >> - is: >> -- obviously forwarding packets, >> -- owning the ADSL, >> -- doing the transparent redirection of to using >> NAT: -A PREROUTING -s 10.100.0.100 -i dmz -p tcp -m state --state NEW -m >> tcp --dport 80 -j ACCEPT >> -A PREROUTING -s 10.0.0.Y/3

Re: [squid-users] http_port intercept: squid 3.1.20 VS 3.5.23.

2017-10-04 Thread Antony Stone
On Wednesday 04 October 2017 at 13:30:52, Thomas Martin wrote: > Hello, > > I'm having trouble to make Squid 3.5.23 work like Squid 3.1.20 does. > > Here is my setup: >|| > > 10.0.0.Y/24| 10.0.0.254/24 <-> 10.100.0.254/24 | 10.100.0.100/24

[squid-users] http_port intercept: squid 3.1.20 VS 3.5.23.

2017-10-04 Thread Thomas Martin
Hello, I'm having trouble to make Squid 3.5.23 work like Squid 3.1.20 does. Here is my setup: || 10.0.0.Y/24| 10.0.0.254/24 <-> 10.100.0.254/24 | 10.100.0.100/24 The goal was to have the as a transparent HTTP proxy for all ; it was achieved