Re: [squid-users] Delay pool not limiting each connection

2018-09-17 Thread Arsalan Hussain
you need to understand delay_parameters 1 625000/625000 625000/625000 625000/625000 625000/625000( You defined 625000 max and also given 625000 to individual) see this how you can limit each user bytes of bandwidht delay_parametes1 62500/62500 25000/25000 # each user has given an average o

Re: [squid-users] Delay pool not limiting each connection

2018-09-17 Thread Arsalan Hussain
Dear Sekarit you are using class-1 pool which has a single aggregate bucket to allocate to all users and every one can use the maximum available FCFS basis. you need to use class-2 delay pool has an aggregate bucket and 256 individual buckets which distributed among clients t keep them in limit w

Re: [squid-users] Delay pool not limiting each connection

2018-09-17 Thread Sekar Duraisamy
Anyone can help me on this? On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 6:45 PM, Sekar Duraisamy wrote: > Hello All, > > I have tried to limit the bandwidth for each requests with 5Mbps speed > with below. > > delay_pools 1 > delay_class 1 2 > delay_access 1 allow all > delay_parameters 1 625000/625000 625000/625000

Re: [squid-users] Delay pool not limiting each connection

2018-09-17 Thread Amos Jeffries
On 18/09/18 1:15 AM, Sekar Duraisamy wrote: > Hello All, > > I have tried to limit the bandwidth for each requests with 5Mbps speed > with below. > > delay_pools 1 > delay_class 1 2 > delay_access 1 allow all > delay_parameters 1 625000/625000 625000/625000 > > > But it is limiting total bandwi

[squid-users] Delay pool not limiting each connection

2018-09-17 Thread Sekar Duraisamy
Hello All, I have tried to limit the bandwidth for each requests with 5Mbps speed with below. delay_pools 1 delay_class 1 2 delay_access 1 allow all delay_parameters 1 625000/625000 625000/625000 But it is limiting total bandwidth of the squid only 625000 and not allowing the same bandwdith for

Re: [squid-users] delay-pool based on authentication

2018-03-30 Thread vvv25
Thank you very much for support! Yes, using the config pattern I gave in my first post to this thread. Just replace the exclusion 'deny' with 'allow'. " Use: delay_access 2 allow !users all " This didn't work for me because users have to be authenticated first. So I configured 2 instances no

Re: [squid-users] delay-pool based on authentication

2018-03-28 Thread Amos Jeffries
On 29/03/18 07:31, vvv25 wrote: > >> On 27/03/18 02:51, vvv25 wrote: >>> Thank you for your time Amos, >>> >>> the thing is, I want to have the connection to be restricted by default. >>> May be I don't understand how to define acl's in the right order. >>> Or I cannot figure out how to separate

Re: [squid-users] delay-pool based on authentication

2018-03-28 Thread vvv25
On 27/03/18 02:51, vvv25 wrote: Thank you for your time Amos, the thing is, I want to have the connection to be restricted by default. May be I don't understand how to define acl's in the right order. Or I cannot figure out how to separate authenticated users from not authenticated. You misu

Re: [squid-users] delay-pool based on authentication

2018-03-26 Thread Amos Jeffries
On 27/03/18 02:51, vvv25 wrote: > Thank you for your time Amos, > > the thing is, I want to have the connection to be restricted by default. > May be I don't understand how to define acl's in the right order. > Or I cannot figure out how to separate authenticated users from not > authenticated. Y

Re: [squid-users] delay-pool based on authentication

2018-03-26 Thread Amos Jeffries
On 27/03/18 02:46, vv...@gmx.net wrote: > Dear Yuri, > > thank you for your quick reply. > I spend weekend trying and testing some options. > > My problem is, i cannot separate authenticated users from not > authenticated. > This is because a) nobody is allowed to even use the proxy unless the

Re: [squid-users] delay-pool based on authentication

2018-03-26 Thread Yuri
Probably, yes. I'm not so good in delay pools, but I guess you moving to right direction. First require to make clean users separation. I think, Amos can consult you better. ;-) 26.03.2018 19:46, vv...@gmx.net пишет: > Dear Yuri, > > thank you for your quick reply. > I spend weekend trying and

Re: [squid-users] delay-pool based on authentication

2018-03-26 Thread vvv25
Thank you for your time Amos, the thing is, I want to have the connection to be restricted by default. May be I don't understand how to define acl's in the right order. Or I cannot figure out how to separate authenticated users from not authenticated. Do you have some suggestions? Any help w

Re: [squid-users] delay-pool based on authentication

2018-03-26 Thread vvv25
Dear Yuri, thank you for your quick reply. I spend weekend trying and testing some options. My problem is, i cannot separate authenticated users from not authenticated. Here in detail: if I try to do something like this cut acl users proxy_auth "/etc/squid/users" http_access allow

Re: [squid-users] delay-pool based on authentication

2018-03-24 Thread Amos Jeffries
On 25/03/18 04:15, vvv25 wrote:> > I want to set up a slow delay pool by default. (for unauthenticated users) > For registered users I want to assign another delay pool with no > restriction (full speed). The thing with DelayPool is that to "set" no restriction you *dont* assign a delay pool. Wha

Re: [squid-users] delay-pool based on authentication

2018-03-24 Thread Yuri
https://wiki.squid-cache.org/Features/DelayPools 24.03.2018 21:15, vv...@gmx.net пишет: > Dear Comunity, > > I have the following question: > Is it possible with squid to select delay pool depending on whether > the user is authenticated or not? > > Background: > I want to set up a slow delay poo

[squid-users] delay-pool based on authentication

2018-03-24 Thread vvv25
Dear Comunity, I have the following question: Is it possible with squid to select delay pool depending on whether the user is authenticated or not? Background: I want to set up a slow delay pool by default. (for unauthenticated users) For registered users I want to assign another delay pool w

Re: [squid-users] delay pool not workin

2017-09-26 Thread Amos Jeffries
On 23/09/17 04:30, Alex Gutiérrez Martínez wrote: Pool #3 requires the domain name of a single transaction to simultaneously be *mail.yahoo.com AND *.linkedin.com AND *.youtube.com   Obviously that is impossible, so nothing can match the line that allows. Pool #1 should match a few things. But

Re: [squid-users] delay pool not workin

2017-09-26 Thread Amos Jeffries
On 23/09/17 03:48, Heiler Bemerguy wrote: Amos, talking about delay pools, I have a question: does it work if the content being served is on a cache peer? It should, yes. Peers are no different than any other server in terms of I/O bytes. The only thing I'm aware of in current Squid is may

Re: [squid-users] delay pool not workin

2017-09-22 Thread Alex Gutiérrez Martínez
Pool #3 requires the domain name of a single transaction to simultaneously be *mail.yahoo.com AND *.linkedin.com AND *.youtube.com   Obviously that is impossible, so nothing can match the line that allows. Pool #1 should match a few things. But probably not what you are testing with. I suggest y

Re: [squid-users] delay pool not workin

2017-09-22 Thread Heiler Bemerguy
Amos, talking about delay pools, I have a question: does it work if the content being served is on a cache peer? I think it only "shapes" traffic from a SERVER to squid, right? not from a peer cache to squid.. :/ I'm having problems because we use a huge Microsoft Updates repository as a cac

Re: [squid-users] delay pool not workin

2017-09-22 Thread Amos Jeffries
On 23/09/17 02:31, Alex Gutiérrez Martínez wrote: Could someone be so kind  to explain to me why my rules do not work on my delays pools? ... Thanks again Mr. Jeffries, i change my delay to: acl navegación src 192.168.9.0/24 acl lento dstdomain "/etc/squid3/bloqueo/lento"   --> .youtube.com

Re: [squid-users] delay pool not workin

2017-09-22 Thread Alex Gutiérrez Martínez
Could someone be so kind  to explain to me why my rules do not work on my delays pools? i got this acl "lento", in spanish means slow acl lento url_regex -i "/etc/squid3/bloqueo/lento" his format is the next: .youtube.com .facebook.com First problem: you are putting domains in dstdomain fo

Re: [squid-users] delay pool not workin

2017-09-21 Thread Amos Jeffries
On 22/09/17 09:07, Alex Gutiérrez Martínez wrote: Could someone be so kind  to explain to me why my rules do not work on my delays pools? i got this acl "lento", in spanish means slow acl lento url_regex -i "/etc/squid3/bloqueo/lento" his format is the next: .youtube.com .facebook.com

[squid-users] delay pool not workin

2017-09-21 Thread Alex Gutiérrez Martínez
Could someone be so kind  to explain to me why my rules do not work on my delays pools? i got this acl "lento", in spanish means slow acl lento url_regex -i "/etc/squid3/bloqueo/lento" his format is the next: .youtube.com .facebook.com My delay config is the next: #

Re: [squid-users] Delay pool class 2

2016-05-02 Thread Amos Jeffries
On 2/05/2016 9:52 p.m., Magic Link wrote: > Hi, > > i want to use delay pool with class 2. I don't understand how > requests are handled on each bucket. There are 2 type of buckets in > class 2, one aggregate and 256 individuals buckets. When aggregate > bucket is used ? Is there a priority betwee

[squid-users] Delay pool class 2

2016-05-02 Thread Magic Link
Hi, i want to use delay pool with class 2. I don't understand how requests are handled on each bucket. There are 2 type of buckets in class 2, one aggregate and 256 individuals buckets. When aggregate bucket is used ? Is there a priority between each type ? I want to limit bandwith for each I

Re: [squid-users] Delay pool with large negative numbers

2015-10-30 Thread Chico Venancio
This seems to be fixed in 3.5.10. Tough I still see a few large-ish negative numbers (-7373 for example) they seem to stop growing indefinitely. Chico Venancio CEO e Diretor de Criação VM TECH - (98) 9 8800 2743 2015-10-25 23:17 GMT-03:00 Amos Jeffries : > On 26/10/2015 5:23 a.m., Chico Venanci

Re: [squid-users] Delay pool with large negative numbers

2015-10-25 Thread Amos Jeffries
On 26/10/2015 5:23 a.m., Chico Venancio wrote: > Is everyone still having this issue? > We tried messing arround with the .conf and used a 32bit debian as well to > no avail. > No. Just those of you having it. I am suspecting that the problem is related to CONNECT tunnels. Since HTTPS traffic is

Re: [squid-users] Delay pool with large negative numbers

2015-10-25 Thread Chico Venancio
Is everyone still having this issue? We tried messing arround with the .conf and used a 32bit debian as well to no avail. Chico Venancio > 2015-10-14 0:03 GMT-03:00 Amos Jeffries : >> >> On 14/10/2015 11:46 a.m., Chico Venancio wrote: >> > I have configured delay pools for a client that delays ac

Re: [squid-users] Delay pool with large negative numbers

2015-10-13 Thread Amos Jeffries
On 14/10/2015 11:46 a.m., Chico Venancio wrote: > I have configured delay pools for a client that delays access to a few > sites, including youtube and facebook. > It seems to work for some clients, and has significantly reduced link > congestion. However, some clients seem to be unaffected by the

[squid-users] Delay pool with large negative numbers

2015-10-13 Thread Chico Venancio
I have configured delay pools for a client that delays access to a few sites, including youtube and facebook. It seems to work for some clients, and has significantly reduced link congestion. However, some clients seem to be unaffected by the delay pools. The output to squidclient mgr:delay is as

Re: [squid-users] Delay pool change

2015-04-15 Thread Amos Jeffries
On 15/04/2015 11:33 a.m., Hector Chan wrote: > Hi all, > > If I configure a new delay pool in the config file or reconfigure an > existing delay pool, do I have to restart squid? Can I send a SIGHUP to it > to re-read the config file instead ? If I send a SIGHUP, what would happen > to downloads

[squid-users] Delay pool change

2015-04-14 Thread Hector Chan
Hi all, If I configure a new delay pool in the config file or reconfigure an existing delay pool, do I have to restart squid? Can I send a SIGHUP to it to re-read the config file instead ? If I send a SIGHUP, what would happen to downloads that are in progress ? Thanks, Hector _

Re: [squid-users] delay pool

2015-02-19 Thread Amos Jeffries
On 20/02/2015 11:20 a.m., Hector Chan wrote: > Hi all, > > Is there anyway I can apply the delay pool to only cache miss ? I wanted > to let the client download as fast as possible if the request resulted in a > cache hit, but not on cache miss. That is the default behaviour for delay pools. Th

[squid-users] delay pool

2015-02-19 Thread Hector Chan
Hi all, Is there anyway I can apply the delay pool to only cache miss ? I wanted to let the client download as fast as possible if the request resulted in a cache hit, but not on cache miss. Thanks, Hector ___ squid-users mailing list squid-users@lists