I just read through the wiki being discussed. For the first time, I think I
finally understand, for the most part, what peek, splice and stare do. The
last time I read the wiki a few months ago, I gave up understanding those
because it was too confusing to me.
Thanks!
On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 9:28
On 08/24/2016 07:23 AM, Marcus Kool wrote:
> I added an image in PNG format with data flow and events.
And I added an XXX why that image might do more harm than good.
> If you are interested I can send you the ODG file that was
> used to generate the image.
Please attach those image sources to
On 08/24/2016 02:43 AM, Alex Rousskov wrote:
On 08/23/2016 08:34 AM, Marcus Kool wrote:
ok, I suggest that you review what is done already.
I have made a few corrections and improvements, trying to document every
change (and some suggestions for future work) in the commit messages.
The pag
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
May be will be more right to refer it by squirky :-)
24.08.2016 2:03, Stanford Prescott пишет:
> I've been thinking that since we are talking about the squid wiki perhaps we
> could just refer to it
as the squiki?
>
> On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 10:
I've been thinking that since we are talking about the squid wiki perhaps
we could just refer to it as the squiki?
On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 10:11 AM, Alex Rousskov <
rouss...@measurement-factory.com> wrote:
> On 08/23/2016 08:34 AM, Marcus Kool wrote:
> > On 08/23/2016 11:26 AM, Alex Rousskov wrot
On 08/23/2016 08:34 AM, Marcus Kool wrote:
> On 08/23/2016 11:26 AM, Alex Rousskov wrote:
>> BTW, please note that you blanket change of letters SSL to letters TLS
>> makes wiki diffs nearly useless for review. It is probably too late to
>> undo that, but please avoid/delay similar non-changes in t
On 08/23/2016 11:26 AM, Alex Rousskov wrote:
On 08/23/2016 07:59 AM, Marcus Kool wrote:
On 08/23/2016 12:44 AM, Alex Rousskov wrote:
On 08/22/2016 08:14 PM, Marcus Kool wrote:
When I think I am done, I will let you know for a review.
It is best to commit all your intended changes at once
On 08/23/2016 07:59 AM, Marcus Kool wrote:
> On 08/23/2016 12:44 AM, Alex Rousskov wrote:
>> On 08/22/2016 08:14 PM, Marcus Kool wrote:
>>> When I think I am done, I will let you know for a review.
>> It is best to commit all your intended changes at once (if at all)
>> rather than to use the publ
On 08/23/2016 12:44 AM, Alex Rousskov wrote:
On 08/22/2016 08:14 PM, Marcus Kool wrote:
Thanks for your reply.
I will start changing the wiki page.
When I think I am done, I will let you know for a review.
It is best to commit all your intended changes at once (if at all)
rather than to use
On 08/22/2016 08:14 PM, Marcus Kool wrote:
> Thanks for your reply.
> I will start changing the wiki page.
> When I think I am done, I will let you know for a review.
It is best to commit all your intended changes at once (if at all)
rather than to use the public page as a scratch pad -- folks rea
Thanks for your reply.
I will start changing the wiki page.
When I think I am done, I will let you know for a review.
What is left is my desire to get a fake CONNECT with FQDN (see below).
Marcus
On 08/22/2016 04:20 PM, Alex Rousskov wrote:
On 08/21/2016 06:46 AM, Marcus Kool wrote:
there are
On 08/21/2016 06:46 AM, Marcus Kool wrote:
> there are still some issues with the wiki page that I like to clarify.
Thanks a lot for working on this!
> wiki: http://wiki.squid-cache.org/Features/SslPeekAndSplice
>
> section "processing steps"
>
> Can action "none" be removed from step 1?
Done
The ssl-bump peek/splice/bump feature is now maturing and many are using it but
there are still some issues with the wiki page that I like to clarify.
wiki: http://wiki.squid-cache.org/Features/SslPeekAndSplice
section "processing steps"
Can action "none" be removed from step 1?
Step 1. what i
13 matches
Mail list logo