Re: [squid-users] a lot of TCP_SWAPFAIL_MISS/200

2015-08-10 Thread Helmut Hullen
Hallo, Dan, Du meintest am 10.08.15 zum Thema Re: [squid-users] a lot of TCP_SWAPFAIL_MISS/200: > Native English speaker here -- though I'm not HackXBack, just see > that he hasn't replied to you yet. [...] > I don't know why people don't give the bug higher prio

Re: [squid-users] a lot of TCP_SWAPFAIL_MISS/200

2015-08-10 Thread Dan Purgert
Quoting Helmut Hullen : Hallo, HackXBack, Du meintest am 07.08.15: yea joe i dont know why ppl dnt give this bug importance while it deduce alot of hit ratio Can you please translate this kind of pidgin english into usual written english, to please all foreign readers who have only learned

Re: [squid-users] a lot of TCP_SWAPFAIL_MISS/200

2015-08-08 Thread Helmut Hullen
Hallo, HackXBack, Du meintest am 07.08.15: > yea joe i dont know why ppl dnt give this bug importance while it > deduce alot of hit ratio Can you please translate this kind of pidgin english into usual written english, to please all foreign readers who have only learned this written english?

Re: [squid-users] a lot of TCP_SWAPFAIL_MISS/200

2015-08-08 Thread Amos Jeffries
On 8/08/2015 10:38 a.m., HackXBack wrote: > yea joe i dont know why ppl dnt give this bug importance while it deduce a > lot of hit ratio > yea. um ... isn't that your job ? Answering the question of: "Why cant Squid read this file off disk?" sure sounds like something the admin in charge is

Re: [squid-users] a lot of TCP_SWAPFAIL_MISS/200

2015-08-07 Thread HackXBack
yea joe i dont know why ppl dnt give this bug importance while it deduce a lot of hit ratio -- View this message in context: http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/a-lot-of-TCP-SWAPFAIL-MISS-200-tp4672011p4672636.html Sent from the Squid - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _

Re: [squid-users] a lot of TCP_SWAPFAIL_MISS/200

2015-08-07 Thread joe
amos i get as well same alot TCP_SWAPFAIL_MISS/200 pls guys look at that bug tks -- View this message in context: http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/a-lot-of-TCP-SWAPFAIL-MISS-200-tp4672011p4672635.html Sent from the Squid - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. __

Re: [squid-users] a lot of TCP_SWAPFAIL_MISS/200

2015-07-19 Thread Amos Jeffries
On 19/07/2015 10:09 p.m., HackXBack wrote: > but this happen only with version 3.5 , and it increase after restarting > squid or rebooting system > this is bug in 3.5 and it decrease the HIT ratio , > you dont think so ? I've seen a lot of reports of it happening on all Squid versions where shutd

Re: [squid-users] a lot of TCP_SWAPFAIL_MISS/200

2015-07-19 Thread Amos Jeffries
On 20/07/2015 2:24 a.m., HackXBack wrote: > top shows only 1 worker for squid .. > Top shows processes. worker is a type of process, but not the only type for Squid. There should be at least 2 Squid processes in most installations (master/coordinator + one or more workers). Only MacOS, Ubuntu, a

Re: [squid-users] a lot of TCP_SWAPFAIL_MISS/200

2015-07-19 Thread HackXBack
top shows only 1 worker for squid .. top - 16:24:51 up 5 days, 3:22, 2 users, load average: 2.06, 1.18, 0.82 Tasks: 158 total, 2 running, 156 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie %Cpu(s): 1.7 us, 0.7 sy, 0.0 ni, 96.7 id, 0.3 wa, 0.0 hi, 0.6 si, 0.0 st KiB Mem: 32928480 total, 29039108 us

Re: [squid-users] a lot of TCP_SWAPFAIL_MISS/200

2015-07-19 Thread Eliezer Croitoru
On 19/07/2015 13:23, HackXBack wrote: yes am using AUFS cache_dir directive With how many workers? Eliezer ___ squid-users mailing list squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org http://lists.squid-cache.org/listinfo/squid-users

Re: [squid-users] a lot of TCP_SWAPFAIL_MISS/200

2015-07-19 Thread HackXBack
yes am using AUFS cache_dir directive -- View this message in context: http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/a-lot-of-TCP-SWAPFAIL-MISS-200-tp4672011p4672316.html Sent from the Squid - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ squid-u

Re: [squid-users] a lot of TCP_SWAPFAIL_MISS/200

2015-07-19 Thread Yuri Voinov
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Take a look on thread "AUFS vs. DISKD" 19.07.15 16:12, HackXBack пишет: > 2015/07/19 12:13:14 kid1| /cache05/2/07/FF/0007FF14 > 2015/07/19 12:13:15 kid1| DiskThreadsDiskFile::openDone: (2) No such file or > directory > 2015/07/19 12:13:15 ki

Re: [squid-users] a lot of TCP_SWAPFAIL_MISS/200

2015-07-19 Thread HackXBack
2015/07/19 12:13:14 kid1| /cache05/2/07/FF/0007FF14 2015/07/19 12:13:15 kid1| DiskThreadsDiskFile::openDone: (2) No such file or directory 2015/07/19 12:13:15 kid1| /cache01/2/03/04/000304B7 2015/07/19 12:13:16 kid1| DiskThreadsDiskFile::openDone: (2) No such file or directory 2015/07/1

Re: [squid-users] a lot of TCP_SWAPFAIL_MISS/200

2015-07-19 Thread HackXBack
but this happen only with version 3.5 , and it increase after restarting squid or rebooting system this is bug in 3.5 and it decrease the HIT ratio , you dont think so ? -- View this message in context: http://squid-web-proxy-cache.1019090.n4.nabble.com/a-lot-of-TCP-SWAPFAIL-MISS-200-tp4672011

Re: [squid-users] a lot of TCP_SWAPFAIL_MISS/200

2015-07-02 Thread Amos Jeffries
On 2/07/2015 11:31 a.m., HackXBack wrote: > after upgrading to 3.5.5 > i see in cache.log > 2015/07/02 01:51:51 kid1| DiskThreadsDiskFile::openDone: (2) No such file or > directory > 2015/07/02 01:51:51 kid1| /cache01/2/16/AA/0016AA3B > - ORIGINAL_DST/203.77.186.75 video/mp4 > access.log > T

[squid-users] a lot of TCP_SWAPFAIL_MISS/200

2015-07-01 Thread HackXBack
after upgrading to 3.5.5 i see in cache.log 2015/07/02 01:51:51 kid1| DiskThreadsDiskFile::openDone: (2) No such file or directory 2015/07/02 01:51:51 kid1| /cache01/2/16/AA/0016AA3B - ORIGINAL_DST/203.77.186.75 video/mp4 access.log TCP_SWAPFAIL_MISS/200 -- View this message in context