Re: [squid-users] TCP_TUNNEL/500 internal server error bandwidth impact

2023-09-27 Thread Alex Rousskov
On 2023-09-27 09:30, Marko Cupać wrote: 169568.912 69973 10.X.X.X TCP_TUNNEL/500 8503669 CONNECT ipv4-c002-beg001-oriontelekom-isp.1.oca.nflxvideo.net:443 some.gal HIER_DIRECT/93.93.192.146 - 1695679277.395 876830 10.X.X.X TCP_TUNNEL/500 105991027 CONNECT rostov1.nebula.to:443 some.guy H

[squid-users] TCP_TUNNEL/500 internal server error bandwidth impact

2023-09-27 Thread Marko Cupać
Hi, I have successfully been running AD-authenticated, ssl-bumped (for a few sites of our own, the rest is spliced) squid proxy server for more than a decade, where for such success I am greatly thankful to all the people who develop squid and who helped me on this list numerous times. Lately I a

Re: [squid-users] TCP_TUNNEL/500 in squid logs in squid 5.9

2023-06-12 Thread sachin gupta
hin, > > What's the issue? > That the logs don't reflect the reality? > > Thanks, > Eliezer > > > From: squid-users On Behalf > Of sachin gupta > Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2023 18:21 > To: squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org > Subject: [squid-users] TCP_TUN

Re: [squid-users] TCP_TUNNEL/500 in squid logs in squid 5.9

2023-06-12 Thread ngtech1ltd
Hey Sachin, What's the issue? That the logs don't reflect the reality? Thanks, Eliezer From: squid-users On Behalf Of sachin gupta Sent: Thursday, May 25, 2023 18:21 To: squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org Subject: [squid-users] TCP_TUNNEL/500 in squid logs in squid 5.9 Hi A

Re: [squid-users] TCP_TUNNEL/500 in squid logs in squid 5.9

2023-05-26 Thread sachin gupta
Hi I also added some prints in ClientHttpRequest::logRequest to see if it is getting 500 from response. 398 if (const auto reply = findReply()) { 399 400 debugs(33, 8, "SACHIN clientLogRequest: status='" << reply->sline.status() << "'"); 401 debugs(33, 8, "SACHIN clien

[squid-users] TCP_TUNNEL/500 in squid logs in squid 5.9

2023-05-25 Thread sachin gupta
Hi All We are migrating for squid 4.15 to squid 5.9. We are running our existing test suite to check if we pass our sanity testing. For requests in transparent mode, though request passes and client get 200, in squid logs we are getting TCP_TUNNEL/500. We were not getting this issue with squid 4.

Re: [squid-users] TCP_TUNNEL

2019-12-05 Thread Amos Jeffries
On 5/12/19 10:13 pm, Kassir Bariq wrote: > Hi Awesome Squid Users 😊 > > I’m using Squid transparent proxy on AWS. I’m having a small problem, > but I don’t really know what is happening! > >   > > From an EC2 in Private Subnet I’m making a request to AWS Endpoints > using 443, and the request is

[squid-users] TCP_TUNNEL

2019-12-05 Thread Kassir Bariq
Hi Awesome Squid Users 😊 I’m using Squid transparent proxy on AWS. I’m having a small problem, but I don’t really know what is happening! From an EC2 in Private Subnet I’m making a request to AWS Endpoints using 443, and the request is going via Squid and says Connected, but unfortunately it is

Re: [squid-users] TCP_TUNNEL and ecap

2019-01-22 Thread Alex Rousskov
On 1/21/19 10:47 PM, Michael Hendrie wrote: > I understand that in most cases adaptation of a tunnelled HTTPS > response is pointless as it would result message corruption but > wondering if it is at all possible to get the TCP_TUNNEL response > seen by ecap It would be possible (and, in some

[squid-users] TCP_TUNNEL and ecap

2019-01-21 Thread Michael Hendrie
Hi All, I have an ecap adapter that amongst other things tracks response size. This works fine for HTTP and ssl-bump'd HTTPS but not for TCP_TUNNEL responses as they are not seen by the ecap adapter. I understand that in most cases adaptation of a tunnelled HTTPS response is pointless as it w