Re: [squid-users] TCP_REFRESH_UNMODIFIEDs are really MISSes

2017-10-12 Thread Alex Rousskov
On 10/12/2017 04:17 AM, Victor Sudakov wrote: > Alex Rousskov wrote: >> P.S. If the above is not documented on Squid wiki, please consider >> documenting it. Thank you in advance. > You suggest I do it? I suggest that you should at least consider doing it. In a nutshell, there is nobody better t

Re: [squid-users] TCP_REFRESH_UNMODIFIEDs are really MISSes

2017-10-12 Thread Victor Sudakov
Alex Rousskov wrote: > On 10/11/2017 04:52 AM, Amos Jeffries wrote: > > On 11/10/17 23:31, Victor Sudakov wrote: > >> Alex Rousskov wrote: > >>> To be sure that you are comparing apples to apples, you would need > >>> to log the X-Cache-Lookup response header to access.log (or enable > >>> ALL,2 de

Re: [squid-users] TCP_REFRESH_UNMODIFIEDs are really MISSes

2017-10-11 Thread Victor Sudakov
Amos Jeffries wrote: > > Alex Rousskov wrote: > >> On 10/10/2017 07:50 PM, Victor Sudakov wrote: > >> > >>> When updating several almost identical FreeBSD hosts via a > >>> squid-3.5.27 proxy, I expect to see lots of HITs, because the patches > >>> on the update server should be identical too. > >>

Re: [squid-users] TCP_REFRESH_UNMODIFIEDs are really MISSes

2017-10-11 Thread Alex Rousskov
On 10/11/2017 04:52 AM, Amos Jeffries wrote: > On 11/10/17 23:31, Victor Sudakov wrote: >> Alex Rousskov wrote: >>> To be sure that you are comparing apples to apples, you would need >>> to log the X-Cache-Lookup response header to access.log (or enable >>> ALL,2 debugging to see headers and/or col

Re: [squid-users] TCP_REFRESH_UNMODIFIEDs are really MISSes

2017-10-11 Thread Amos Jeffries
On 11/10/17 23:31, Victor Sudakov wrote: Alex Rousskov wrote: On 10/10/2017 07:50 PM, Victor Sudakov wrote: When updating several almost identical FreeBSD hosts via a squid-3.5.27 proxy, I expect to see lots of HITs, because the patches on the update server should be identical too. However, I

Re: [squid-users] TCP_REFRESH_UNMODIFIEDs are really MISSes

2017-10-11 Thread Victor Sudakov
Alex Rousskov wrote: > On 10/10/2017 07:50 PM, Victor Sudakov wrote: > > > When updating several almost identical FreeBSD hosts via a > > squid-3.5.27 proxy, I expect to see lots of HITs, because the patches > > on the update server should be identical too. > > > > However, I see lots of TCP_REFR

Re: [squid-users] TCP_REFRESH_UNMODIFIEDs are really MISSes

2017-10-10 Thread Alex Rousskov
On 10/10/2017 07:50 PM, Victor Sudakov wrote: > When updating several almost identical FreeBSD hosts via a > squid-3.5.27 proxy, I expect to see lots of HITs, because the patches > on the update server should be identical too. > > However, I see lots of TCP_REFRESH_UNMODIFIED lines, and only > oc

[squid-users] TCP_REFRESH_UNMODIFIEDs are really MISSes

2017-10-10 Thread Victor Sudakov
Dear Colleagues, When updating several almost identical FreeBSD hosts via a squid-3.5.27 proxy, I expect to see lots of HITs, because the patches on the update server should be identical too. However, I see lots of TCP_REFRESH_UNMODIFIED lines, and only occasional HIT statuses. Please see the log