Re: [squid-users] Ssl bump tunneling connection by using Common Name

2017-03-09 Thread Amos Jeffries
On 7/03/2017 5:41 a.m., Eliezer Croitoru wrote: > Hey, > > There was something about it but I believe it's only on squid version 4.0.X. FTR; Squid-4 brings the ability to tunnel Skype clients that were using something that looked a bit like TLS but wasn't (along with the many port 443 non-TLS us

Re: [squid-users] Ssl bump tunneling connection by using Common Name

2017-03-06 Thread Eliezer Croitoru
nux System Administrator Mobile: +972-5-28704261 Email: elie...@ngtech.co.il From: squid-users [mailto:squid-users-boun...@lists.squid-cache.org] On Behalf Of Hanoch Hanoch K Sent: Monday, March 6, 2017 3:47 PM To: squid-users@lists.squid-cache.org Subject: [squid-users] Ssl bump tunneling connection by us

Re: [squid-users] Ssl bump tunneling connection by using Common Name

2017-03-06 Thread Alex Rousskov
On 03/06/2017 06:46 AM, Hanoch Hanoch K wrote: > However skype's client app uses client certificates that don't have SNI. SNI is not a property of a client certificate. It is a property of a client Hello message. I do not know whether some Skype clients do not send SNI with their Hellos, but I wa

[squid-users] Ssl bump tunneling connection by using Common Name

2017-03-06 Thread Hanoch Hanoch K
Greetings We're using Squid 3.5.19 with ssl bump, and we want to tunnel (not bump) applications such as skype, that use pinned ssl, so we defined an acl for splicing skype's ssl_server_name. However skype's client app uses client certificates that don't have SNI. The only way to identify skype is